Windchilders6087

ively. Differences in hematoma volume (330 vs 169.3 mL, P = 0.078) and reconstructive failure (33.3% vs 5%, P = 0.057) approached significance between both groups. CONCLUSIONS Hematoma after TE-IBR should be monitored closely, as it may play a role in jeopardizing reconstruction success. Patients on home antithrombotic medication may be at increased risk of larger-volume hematomas and reconstruction failure. Plastic surgeons should consider aggressive surgical evacuation of postoperative TE-IBR hematomas to reduce subsequent complications and reoperations, thus optimizing reconstructive outcomes.BACKGROUND Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is commonly used during immediate expander-based breast reconstruction, with potential advantages of greater intraoperative expansion, decreased time to complete expansion, and decreased rates of capsular contracture. However, ADM is associated with increased infection rate, seroma, and subsequent reconstructive failure. Poly-4-hydroxybutyric acid (P4HB) mesh is a large pore, biosynthetic scaffold shown to fully resorb and incorporate host tissues within 18 months. We sought to compare outcomes between the use of P4HB and ADM in immediate retropectoral expander-based reconstruction. METHODS One hundred ninety-two consecutive cases (107 patients) of breast reconstruction using ADM were compared with a subsequent cohort of 112 cases (62 patients) using P4HB mesh. In all patients, reconstruction was performed immediately after mastectomy by a single surgeon, and outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar between the P4HB and ADM groups. Overall infection rates were lower, but not significantly with P4HB (11% vs 17%, P = 0.18). Time to drain removal was significantly lower with P4HB (15 vs 18 days, P = 0.008), although there was no difference in rates of seroma (0.9% vs 3%, P = 0.43). Similar numbers of patients underwent external beam radiation (22% vs 24%) and received chemotherapy in each group (48% vs 45%). By univariate analysis, all odds ratios were decreased with use of P4HB, including risk of major complications (0.55), seroma (0.17), infection (0.59), need for reoperation (0.78), and skin necrosis (0.77). CONCLUSIONS Initial findings suggest P4HB mesh to be a safe alternative to ADM in expander-based breast reconstruction, with trends toward decreased rates of infection, seroma, and need for device removal using P4HB mesh. Although our results are limited to a small series of initial patients, P4HB mesh may be a promising novel technique to decrease complications inherent to use of ADM at a reduced material cost.The 2019 novel coronavirus acute respiratory epidemic is creating a stressed situation in all the health systems of the affected countries. Emergency medical systems and specifically the emergency departments as the front line of the health systems are suffering from overload and severe working conditions, the risk of contagion and transmission of the health professionals adds a substantial burden to their daily work. Under the perspective of European Society For Emergency Medicine, the recommendations provided by the health authorities are reviewed focus on the emergency department's activity.OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to determine whether forced cough during colposcopy-guided cervical biopsy affected pain and anxiety levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was conducted at the University Hospital (Newark, NJ) Ambulatory Care Center from December 2016 to June 2018 and evaluated 110 patients at the time of a colposcopy-guided cervical biopsy. Study patients were randomized to either cough or no cough group during the biopsy procedure. Pain level was assessed using a visual analog pain scale before, during, and immediately after a colposcopy-guided cervical biopsy. Study patients also completed a standardized anxiety survey before and after the procedure. ARRY-382 T tests, Pearson χ, or Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel were used to compare baseline characteristics between the cough and no cough groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify potential confounders and then compare pain levels across both groups. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between the cough and no cough group when analyzed for each demographic variable even when confounders were accounted for. The anxiety scores for both study groups before and after the procedure were similar and not significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS We observed a trend that cough reduced pain associated with the colposcopy-guided cervical biopsy but did not reach statistical significance. A similar outcome was observed in anxiety level, where anxiety was reduced in the cough group but was not statistically significant as compared with the no cough group. Further studies are necessary to assess various modalities in reducing pain and anxiety associated with colposcopy-guided cervical biopsy.OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to determine which women require loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cervical conization (cone) to exclude cervical cancer after colposcopy for evaluation of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests yet before simple hysterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Review of electronic medical records from colposcopy clinics followed by chart review of women with cervical cancer was conducted. RESULTS Of 18,537 cervical colposcopies for evaluation of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests, 0.6% (103/18,537) had cervical cancer; of 103 women with cervical cancer, 57 had neither cervical biopsy nor endocervical curettage (ECC) showing cancer or rule-out cancer (occult cancers) and were diagnosed by subsequent LEEP (n = 22), cone (n = 31), failed cone (n = 1), or hysterectomy (n = 3). The relative risk of occult cervical cancer at colposcopy for ECC of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or CIN 3 versus ECC not CIN 2 or CIN 3 was 51.5 (5.0% vs 0.1%), for cervical biopsy of CIN 3 versus not CIN 3, was 34.5 (3.9% vs 0.1%), and for colposcopic impression of CIN 2, CIN 3, or cancer (CIN 2+) versus impression not CIN 2+, was 8.5 (1.9% vs 0.2%). If the 10.9% (2,018/18,537) of colposcopies with ECC of CIN 2 or CIN 3, cervical biopsy of CIN 3, or colposcopic impression of CIN 2+ had subsequent LEEP or cone, 96.5% (55/57) of occult cervical cancers would be detected before hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS After colposcopy, women with ECC of CIN 2 or CIN 3, cervical biopsy of CIN 3, or colposcopic impression of CIN 2+ require LEEP or cone before simple hysterectomy.