Westbrandstrup4980

Opioid overdose is a leading cause of death in the United States. Emergency medical services (EMS) encounters following overdose may serve as a critical linkage to care for people who use drugs (PWUD). However, many overdose survivors refuse EMS transport to hospitals, where they would presumably receive appropriate follow-up services and referrals. This study aims to (1) identify reasons for refusal of EMS transport after opioid overdose reversal; (2) identify conditions under which overdose survivors might be more likely to accept these services; and (3) describe solutions proposed by both PWUD and EMS providers to improve post-overdose care.

The study comprised 20 semi-structured, qualitative in-depth interviews with PWUD, followed by two semi-structured focus groups with eight EMS providers.

PWUD cited intolerable withdrawal symptoms; anticipation of inadequate care upon arrival at the hospital; and stigmatizing treatment by EMS and hospital providers as main reasons for refusal to accept EMS transport. EMS providers corroborated these descriptions and offered solutions such as titration of naloxone to avoid harsh withdrawal symptoms; peer outreach or community paramedicine; and addressing provider burnout. ABT-199 price PWUD stated they might accept EMS transport after overdose reversal if they were offered ease for withdrawal symptoms, at either a hospital or non-hospital facility, and treated with respect and empathy.

Standard of care by EMS and hospital providers following overdose reversal should include treatment for withdrawal symptoms, including buprenorphine induction; patient-centered communication; and effective linkage to prevention, treatment, and harm reduction services.

Standard of care by EMS and hospital providers following overdose reversal should include treatment for withdrawal symptoms, including buprenorphine induction; patient-centered communication; and effective linkage to prevention, treatment, and harm reduction services.

This study aimed to determine the efficacy and acceptability of pharmacotherapies for cannabis use disorder (CUD).

We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis, searching five electronic databases for randomized placebo-controlled trials of individuals diagnosed with CUD receiving pharmacotherapy with or without concomitant psychotherapy. Primary outcomes were the reduction in cannabis use and retention in treatment. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, discontinuation due to adverse events, total abstinence, withdrawal symptoms, cravings, and CUD severity. We applied a frequentist, random-effects Network Meta-Analysis model to pool effect sizes across trials using standardized mean differences (SMD, g) and rate ratios (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals.

We identified a total of 24 trials (n=1912, 74.9% male, mean age 30.2 years). Nabilone (d=-4.47 [-8.15; -0.79]), topiramate (d=-3.80 [-7.06; -0.54]), and fatty-acid amyl hydroxylase inhibitors (d=-2.30 [-4.75; 0.15]) rtions appeared to show promise for treating individual aspects of CUD. However, there is a lack of robust evidence to support any particular pharmacological treatment. There is a need for additional studies to expand the evidence base for CUD pharmacotherapy. While medication strategies may become an integral component for CUD treatment one day, psychosocial interventions should remain the first line given the limitations in the available evidence.

Research shows that cannabis use frequency is associated with cannabis dependence and health metrics. However, much less is known about how self-reported cannabis potency (THC and CBD) may be associated with the same metrics, and whether any associations exist after accounting for frequency of cannabis use. Moreover, even less is known about how these relations may differ across cannabis product forms. This exploratory study examined 1) associations between cannabis frequency, potency, and cannabis/health metrics, and 2) whether associations between potency and cannabis/health metrics remained after controlling for frequency of use.

Using a sample of adult recreational cannabis users in Colorado (N=300), we tested the relationship between self-reported cannabis use metrics of frequency and potency of flower, edible, and concentrate products with separate measures of problematic cannabis use (i.e., dependence, withdrawal, craving), depression, anxiety, and general perceived health.

Greater frequency of fblematic cannabis use for flower and concentrates, but it did not account for all observed associations in this study. Differences in patterns of associations between frequency and potency and cannabis/health metrics across cannabis forms suggest a need for better understanding user reports of THC and CBD potency, individual differences among users, and improved measurement.The rapid detection and characterization of carbapenemases in isolates of Enterobacterales are crucial for precise antibiotic administration and infection control. This article reports the findings from a parallel evaluation of the NG-Test Carba 5 (NG Biotech, Guipry, France) and Xpert Carba-R (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) assays in the detection and differentiation of five carbapenemases [imipenem-resistant phenotype (IMP), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase, New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), oxacillin-hydrolyzing β-lactamase (OXA)-48-like, and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase] or the genes that encode them. A total of 122 isolates recovered from blood cultures and 106 positive blood culture broth (BCB) specimens, including 134 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 54 Escherichia coli, 27 Enterobacter cloacae, 8 Klebsiella oxytoca, 2 Klebsiella aerogenes, and 3 Citrobacter freundii, were collected from two tertiary hospitals (Xi'an, China). Using PCR sequencing techniques, 89 isolates and 29 BCB specimens were determined to be Enterobacterales harboring carbapenem-resistance genes. In comparison to the PCR sequencing results, the specificities with both the NG-Test Carba 5 and Xpert Carba-R assays were 100%; the sensitivities were 92.1% and 100%, respectively, for recovered isolates and 79.3% and 100% for BCB specimens. The NG-Test Carba 5 missed eight NDM, four OXA-48-like, and one IMP β-lactamases in specimens containing two or three carbapenemase types. In summary, the NG-Test Carba 5 assay may yield false-negative results if isolates or BCB specimens contain two or three carbapenemases.