Weberboel0443

Recovery community centers (RCCs) have expanded across the U.S., serving as social "recovery hubs" that increase recovery capital (e.g., employment, housing) by providing resources that clinical care does not provide. While research supports RCCs' general utility, little is known about new participants' characteristics, predictors of engagement, services used, and benefits derived. Greater knowledge would inform the field about RCCs' clinical and public health potential.

Prospective, single-group study of individuals (N=275) starting at RCCs (k=7) in the northeastern U.S. and reassessed 3months later regarding the services these individuals used and the benefits they derived (e.g., reduced substance problems, enhanced quality of life [QOL]). Regression and longitudinal models tested theorized relationships.

Participants were mostly young to middle-aged, racially diverse, single, unemployed, men and women, with low education and income, suffering from opioid or alcohol use disorder, with a history of psyinical pathology and low QOL and resources.This study evaluates the impact of enrolling syringe exchange registrants in methadone maintenance on change in sexual-risk behaviors. Baltimore Needle Exchange Program (BNEP) registrants (n = 210) participated in a parent study evaluating strategies for initiating methadone maintenance treatment and the study followed them for six months. Study staff administered the Risk Assessment Battery (RAB; Metzger, 1993) monthly throughout treatment. Staff conducted urinalysis testing weekly. Results showed that treatment enrollment reduced sexual-risk behaviors at month 1, though a longer treatment duration provided no further reductions in risky behaviors. Women reported higher levels of sexual risk throughout the observation period, and the use of cocaine diminished risk-reduction benefits. These findings demonstrate that participation in methadone maintenance reduces sexual-risk behaviors in syringe exchange registrants. Efforts to help more patients reduce cocaine use, and to help women address gender-specific psychosocial vulnerabilities, may further reduce risky behaviors during the treatment episode.Despite its proven efficacy, buprenorphine remains dramatically underutilized for management of opioid use disorder largely due to onerous barriers to treatment initiation. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many substance use disorder treatment facilities have reduced their hours and services, exacerbating existing barriers. To this end, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration adjusted their guidelines to allow for new buprenorphine prescriptions following audio-only telehealth encounters, no longer requiring an in-person evaluation prior to treatment initiation. Under this new guidance, we established a 24/7 telephone hotline to function as a "tele-bridge" clinic where people with opioid use disorder can be linked with a buprenorphine prescriber in real-time for OUD assessment and unobserved buprenorphine initiation with connection to follow-up if appropriate. Additionally, we developed an ED callback protocol to reach patients recently seen for opioid overdose and facilitate their entry into care if interested. In this commentary we describe our hotline and ED callback protocols, discuss theoretical and anecdotal benefits to this approach, and advocate for continuation of current regulatory changes post-COVID-19 to maintain expanded access to novel treatment approaches.

Opioid use disorder in the United States' Medicare population increased from 10 to 24 per 1000 from 2012 to 2018. Understanding the changes in the patterns of opioid overdose mortality over time holds broad clinical and public health relevance.

To examine trends and correlates of opioid overdose deaths from nonprescribed prescription opioids, heroin, and other synthetic opioids.

The study used Medicare-National Death Index linked data from a 20% national sample to identify a retrospective cohort who died from opioid overdose in 2012-2016. The study analyzed data from December 2019 to March 2020.

We examined type of opioid overdose deaths; percentage of opioid deaths without documented opioid prescriptions in the prior 6months; and percentage of deaths from heroin or synthetic opioids among people on long-term prescription opioids whose prescribers reduced or subsequently discontinued their opioids. The study also calculated the proportion receiving medication for addiction treatment. The study includer synthetic opioids increased from 17% in 2012 to 47% in 2016. Factors associated with such deaths, assessed in a stepwise logistic regression model, included diagnosis of hepatitis and opioid use disorder. buy SAR131675 Less than 10% of these enrollees received medication for addiction treatment.

There were substantial increases in patients' obtaining opioid analgesics from unlicensed sources and in overdose deaths from nonprescribed opioids during the study period (2012-2016). Increased access to pain management and opioid use disorder treatments is critical to reducing the opioid overdose deaths in the United States.

There were substantial increases in patients' obtaining opioid analgesics from unlicensed sources and in overdose deaths from nonprescribed opioids during the study period (2012-2016). Increased access to pain management and opioid use disorder treatments is critical to reducing the opioid overdose deaths in the United States.Comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) is common, defined by greater severity and impairment than either disorder alone, and associated with poor treatment attendance. Exposure therapies are effective in treating PTSD+AUD, yet substance use is still cited as a potential contraindication for exposure. This study examined substance use-related predictors of session attendance among veterans (N = 119) randomized to receive integrated exposure therapy (Concurrent Treatment of PTSD and Substance Use Disorders using Prolonged Exposure [COPE]; Back et al., 2015) or integrated coping skills therapy (Seeking Safety [SS]; Najavits, 2002) in a clinical trial for comorbid PTSD+AUD (Norman et al., 2019). At baseline, greater percentage of heavy drinking days (β = -0.23, p = .011) and greater AUD severity per structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR (β = -0.21, p = .019) predicted fewer sessions across both treatments. Treatment type did not moderate the relationship between predictors and attendance, except for a trend for craving (p = .057), where greater craving predicted fewer sessions in SS (β = -0.31, p = .02) but not COPE (β = 0.14, p = .28). Percentage of abstinence days, AUD duration, and living in a controlled environment (e.g., recovery home) at the start of therapy were not associated with attendance in either treatment condition. Only a subset of substance use characteristics predicted attendance. Findings did not support the notion that alcohol use leads to lower attendance in exposure therapy compared to nonexposure therapy.Controlled studies provide little empirical evidence to inform clinical recommendations for the optimal duration (i.e., "dosage") of psychosocial treatment for substance use disorders (SUDs). The current study prospectively examined the relationships among treatment dosage, participant adherence to the treatment regimen, and treatment outcomes in a population of adults with stimulant use disorder (cocaine and/or methamphetamine). The study randomly assigned eighty-five participants to receive either 4 weeks or 16 weeks of standardized outpatient treatment. The treatment consisted of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and content covered was identical for each condition; only the planned duration of participation differed. Although both groups reduced stimulant use over time, participants in the 16-week condition were significantly more likely than those in the 4-week condition to provide stimulantnegative urine specimens 26 and 52 weeks following randomization. Participant adherence to treatment correlated significantly with drug-use outcomes we observed a greater likelihood of stimulant-negative urine tests among those who completed treatment, irrespective of group assignment. Both the number of sessions attended and the percentage of prescribed sessions attended were associated with reductions in stimulant-use frequency 26 and 52 weeks after admission.The COVID-19 pandemic has directly impacted integrated substance use and prenatal care delivery in the United States and has driven a rapid transformation from in-person prenatal care to a hybrid telemedicine care model. Additionally, changes in regulations for take home dosing for methadone treatment for opioid use disorder due to COVID-19 have impacted pregnant and postpartum women. We review the literature on prenatal care models and discuss our experience with integrated substance use and prenatal care delivery during COVID-19 at New England's largest safety net hospital and national leader in substance use care. In our patient-centered medical home for pregnant and postpartum patients with substance use disorder, patients' early responses to these changes have been overwhelmingly positive. Should clinicians continue to use these models, thoughtful planning and further research will be necessary to ensure equitable access to the benefits of telemedicine and take home dosing for all pregnant and postpartum patients with substance use disorder.Federal regulatory changes during the COVID-19 pandemic allow buprenorphine to be prescribed without an initial in-person evaluation. Prior to COVID-19, numerous barriers limited broad uptake of buprenorphine among people who use drugs at the system, provider, and patient levels, including lack of available DATA 2000 waivered clinicians to prescribe, stigma, and competing livelihood priorities. As two harm reduction primary care programs in New York State that care for people who use drugs and offer buprenorphine, one rural (Ithaca) and one urban (Manhattan), we have rapidly adopted telemedicine to initiate buprenorphine treatment. Our collective experience suggests that telemedicine for buprenorphine initiation is eliminating many traditional barriers to treatment, in particular for individuals leaving incarceration, and people who use drugs and access syringe service programs. Future models of buprenorphine treatment should incorporate telemedicine for buprenorphine initiation, which can be done in collaboration with community-based outreach and peer networks to engage people who use drugs. This regulatory change must be sustained beyond COVID-19, and is vital to increasing access to buprenorphine, closing the opioid use disorder treatment gap, and achieving greater health equity for people who use drugs.The COVID-19 pandemic created a number of rapidly emerging and unprecedented challenges for those engaged in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, forcing service providers to improvise their treatment strategies as the crisis deepened. Drawing from five ongoing federally funded SUD projects in Appalachian Tennessee and hundreds of hours of meetings and interviews, this article explores the pandemic's impact on an already structurally disadvantaged region, its recovery community, and those who serve it. More specifically, we note detrimental effects of increased isolation since the implementation of COVID-19 safety measures, including stakeholders' reports of higher incidences of relapse, overdose, and deaths in the SUD population. Treatment providers have responded with telehealth services, but faced barriers in technology access and computer literacy among clients. Providers have also had to restrict new clients to accommodate social distancing, faced delays in health screening those they can accept, and denied family visitations, which has affected retention.