Valentinhusum8076

Z Iurium Wiki

Children with adequate vitamin B6 had a higher Chao1 diversity index than children with inadequate or excessive intake (p = 0.0004). Children with excessive selenium intake had a trend for higher Pielou's_e index than children with inadequate intake (p = 0.091). Maintaining a healthy gut microbiome is critical among children with cancer. This study provides new insights on the linkages between dietary intakes and the gut microbiome in children with solid tumors postchemotherapy. These findings, if replicated in future independent studies, may help anticipate malnutrition and plan for personalized nutrition approaches during chemotherapy in pediatric cancers.Background Alcohol and binge drinking pose significant health risks, especially for underage women; nonetheless, binge drinking is common. Materials and Methods To evaluate the effectiveness of the PartyWise intervention in increasing awareness of sex differences in the risks of binge drinking, we used social media to enroll 520 female adolescents aged 15-19 years in a randomized controlled trial. Intervention participants received telephone screening, a brief counseling intervention with web-based resources (http//www.partywise.org), and up to 8 weekly text messages. Results At baseline, most (71%) participants reported alcohol consumption in the prior month and 44% reported binge drinking (four or more drinks on one occasion), without differences between study groups; 79% of participants were aware of sex-based differences in alcohol risks. At follow-up, intervention recipients were more knowledgeable about sex-based differences in alcohol risks (adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 8.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.35-23.49 at 3 months; adj OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.21-4.90 at 9 months) and more likely to accurately define binge drinking (adj OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.02-2.60 at 3 months; OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.89-2.06 at 9 months). Although rates of any binge drinking in the past month remained similar between groups, intervention recipients were less likely to report binge drinking more than once in the past 30 days (22% vs. 32%, adj OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.99 at 3 months; 27% vs. 30%, adj OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.60-1.55 at 9 months). Conclusions The PartyWise intervention is a promising approach to increasing awareness of the risks of binge drinking for underage women in a remotely delivered platform. Clinical Trials Registration The Share Health Study Teen Social Connections and Health (Phase 2), NCT03842540, https//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03842540?id=NCT03842540&draw=2&rank=1.Pharmaceutical companies regularly fund patient organizations. It is important for patient organizations' credibility that there be transparency regarding this financial support. In Europe, the pharmaceutical industry promises to deliver transparency through self-regulation, as opposed to legally binding provisions, but self-regulation's effectiveness is contested. We compared the industry's transparency of funding in four Nordic countries that, given their general reputation for high transparency, offered a critical test of self-regulation's ability to deliver on its transparency promise. For 2017-2019, we compared national rules regarding funding disclosure; disclosure practices as evidenced by the availability, accessibility, and format of company transparency reports; and disclosure data, including payment descriptions and sums. Transparency problems differed in kind and magnitude between countries. In Norway and Finland, unlike in Sweden and Denmark, data on funding were difficult to access and analyze and sometimes seemed incomplete or missing. We explain that a key factor allowing for country differences is the freedom given to a country's pharmaceutical industry trade associations to form self-regulatory rules, provided they do not fall below the weak, European-level minimum requirements. Transparency could be improved by aligning rules and practices with the FAIR data principles that is, corporate disclosures should be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.Determining the adverse nature of findings from nonclinical safety studies often poses a challenge for the key stakeholders responsible for interpreting the results of definitive toxicity studies in support of pharmaceutical product development. Although there are instances in which responses to treatment clearly indicate intolerability or tissue injury associated with dysfunction; in practice, more often there is uncertainty in characterizing an effect of drug treatment as adverse or not. This is due to the inherent variability in responses of biological test systems to toxicological insults, leaving the ultimate analyses of adversity to individual interpretation and subjectivity. This article is a follow-up to the workshop entitled, "Adverse or Not Adverse? Thinking process behind adversity determination during nonclinical drug development," conducted at the 58th Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology, March 2019 in Baltimore, MD. In this paper, we further discuss and incorporate the perspectives of authors representing different roles, such as Study Director, Study Pathologist, Pharmacology/Toxicology Reviewer (U.S. Food and Drug Administration), and Sponsor in the determination and use of adversity. We also present a practical stepwise approach as an aid in this assessment, and further apply these principles to discuss 10 case studies with different therapeutic modalities and unique challenges.How decisions are made and patients cared for are often guided by the Golden Rule, which would have us treat patients as we would want to be treated in similar circumstances. But when patients' lived experiences and outlooks deviate substantively from our own, we stop being a reliable barometer of their needs, values, and goals. Inaccurate perceptions of their suffering and our personal biases may lead to distorted compassion, marked by an attitude of pity and therapeutic nihilism. In those instances, The Platinum Rule, which would have us consider doing unto patients as they would want done unto themselves, may be a more appropriate standard for achieving optimal person-centered care. This means knowing who patients are as persons, hence guiding treatment decisions and shaping a tone of care based on compassion and respect.Background Preclinical and clinical research has suggested the existence of pregnancy-associated analgesia, wherein responses to painful stimulation or pain from disease decrease during pregnancy. Materials and Methods We combined data from multiple years (2012-2015) of the National Health Interview Survey to examine high-impact pain by Hispanic ethnicity and race in women with no prior pregnancy, during pregnancy, and previously pregnant. Results High-impact pain was less common for women during pregnancy (10.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.0%-13.7%) than it was for women who had never been pregnant (13.7%; 95% CI 12.8%-14.5%) and for women who had previously been pregnant (19.8%; 95% CI 16.0%-23.7%). However, when we examined the data by Hispanic ethnicity and race, we found that non-Hispanic White (NHW) women were less likely to report high-impact pain during pregnancy, but non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women and Hispanic White women were not. In women who reported no prior pregnancy, NHW women were most likely to report high-impact pain, followed by NHB women and Hispanic women. In post hoc analyses, we found that while menstrual problems were associated with increased odds of having high-impact pain, an interaction was not observed between menstrual problems and race/ethnicity (p = 0.48). this website Conclusions This cross-sectional study presents a nationally representative examination of the prevalence of high-impact pain across pregnancy status. Using a nationally representative sample of women, we have demonstrated that the prevalence of high-impact pain varies across pregnancy status and that race/ethnicity and the presence of menstrual problems independently affect this prevalence.Background Validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) has not been established for midlife women before menopause, and evidence suggests that two-factor or three-factor models may be more informative than the PSQI global score derived from its seven components. We hypothesized that the PSQI and its factor structure would be valid in premenopausal women. Materials and Methods We performed a validation study of the PSQI against wrist actigraphy in a community-based convenience sample of 71 healthy premenopausal women (aged 40-50 years). For convergent validity, PSQI and its component scores were compared with homologous actigraphy measures. For discriminant validity, characteristics known to affect sleep quality were compared, including body mass index, exercise, menopausal status, menopausal symptoms, and depressive symptoms measured with the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale. Results The PSQI global score and Components 1 (quality) and 5 (disturbance) were correlated (p  less then  0.05) with actigraphy-measured wake after sleep onset. The PSQI global score and Components 1 (quality) and 7 (daytime dysfunction) were correlated with CES-D scores. PSQI Components 2 (onset latency) and 4 (efficiency) were not congruent with homologous actigraphy measures, while component 3 (duration) was congruent with actigraphy duration. The single-factor PSQI global score had a higher McDonald's omega (0.705) and Cronbach's alpha (0.702) than the two-factor or three-factor models. Conclusions The PSQI global score is a valid measure of sleep quality in healthy midlife women, performing better than two-factor or three-factor models. However, overlapping CES-D and PSQI scores warrant further clinical assessment and research to better differentiate poor sleep quality from depression.Objective Prior literature has shown improved outcomes in morbidity and mortality for admitted patients cared for by female physicians. One theory is that female physicians adhere closely to guideline recommendations. We sought to determine whether patients who have out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) experience more guideline-concordant postcardiac arrest care and potentially better outcomes based on the gender of their treating physician and gender distribution of the treatment teams. Study Design This study is a retrospective cohort study from the Colorado Cardiac Arrest Registry, local registry of OHCA patients treated at one academic urban tertiary care hospital. We analyzed adult OHCA patients who survived to hospital admission but were comatose. Patient demographic data and arrest characteristics were abstracted for subjects, and the gender of the provider was abstracted from the medical record. Results Patients were admitted by a female attending in 28.5% of the cohort. The difference in guideline-concordant care between male and female providers was not significant. No statistical difference was found between all-male or mixed gender teams in adherence to guideline-concordant care. No patient was cared for by an all-female team. Neither gender of the admitting physician nor gender of the physician who led the family meeting to discuss prognosis was associated with a survival difference. Conclusions Prior literature has described differences in outcome based on gender of the treating physician. Our analysis targeted a similar question in a cohort of OHCA patients with survival to hospital admission. We determined that there was no difference in postcardiac arrest guideline concordance and survival to hospital discharge based on treating physician gender. This finding differs from the prior literature and supports the importance of diverse clinical teams in medicine.

Autoři článku: Valentinhusum8076 (Oh Gilbert)