Templesivertsen2665

Z Iurium Wiki

ians were highlighted as barriers. Conclusion Both community and hospital pharmacists show strong willingness to expand their service provision and will need continued support, such as improved legislative structures, more supportive resources and practice focused training opportunities, to further these services.The impact of midline shift (MLS) on long-term survival and progression in glioblastoma (GBM) is unknown. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of mass effect on survival and progression with consideration of the patient demographics, tumor morphology, operative techniques, molecular pathology, and postoperative treatment. One hundred ninety-eight patients with GBM were analyzed retrospectively. Both MLS groups ( less then or ≥ 10 mm) were compared with regard to survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and postoperative course of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). A two-sided Fisher exact test showed no statistically significant differences in the confounders between the low- and high-MLS groups. Givinostat concentration The median survival was 18.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) = 15.3-20.7) in the low-MLS group (n = 173) and 9.0 months (95% CI = 4.8-13.2) in the high-MLS group (n = 25) (p = 0.045). In the high-MLS group, 59.1% (13/22) with an initially high MLS had a KPS of less than 70% after 3 months, whereas 20.5% of the low-MLS group had a KPS of less than 70% (p less then 0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis including the O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status, extent of resection, baseline KPS, and MIB-I index showed low MLS as the only predictor for survival at 12 months (p = 0.046, odds ratio (OR) = 2.70, 95% CI = 1.0-7.2). Median PFS was 6.0 months in the high-MLS group and 9.0 months in the low-MLS group (log-rank test; p = 0.08). An initial midline shift of 10 mm or greater seems to be an imaging characteristic that independently predicts the survival in glioblastoma.Posterior cranial fossa tumours frequently develop hydrocephalus as first presentation in up to 80% of paediatric patients and 21.4% of adults, although it resolves after tumour removal in 70-90% and 96%, respectively. New onset hydrocephalus is reported in about 2.1% of adult and 10-40% of paediatric patients after posterior fossa surgery. There is no consensus concerning prophylactic external ventricular drainage (EVD) placement that is frequently used before posterior fossa lesion removal, as well in those cases without clear evidence of hydrocephalus. The aim of the study was to define the most correct management for patients who undergo posterior fossa tumour surgery, thus identifying cohorts of patients who are at risk of persistent hydrocephalus prior to surgery. A systematic review of literature has been performed, following PRISMA guidelines. Most of the studies reported CSF shunt only in the presence of hydrocephalus, whereas only a few authors suggested its prophylactic use in the absence of signs of ventricular dilatation. Predictive factors for postoperative hydrocephalus has been identified, including young age ( 0.4, pseudomeningocele, CSF leak and infection. The use of pre-resection CSF shunt in case of signs and symptoms of hydrocephalus is mandatory, although it resolves in the majority of cases. As reported by several studies included in the present review, we suggest CSF shunt also in case of asymptomatic hydrocephalus, whereas it is not indicated without evidence of ventricular dilatation.An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.Background We previously reported the HERBIS-4A phase II trial comparing S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) with capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer (GC). We performed a pooled analysis of HERBIS-4A and HERBIS-2, the phase II trial comparing SP with XP in HER2-negative recurrent GC patients with a recurrence-free interval after S-1 adjuvant therapy of ≥ 6 months. Patients and methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SP [S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily for 21 days) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 8), every 5 weeks] or XP [capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days) plus cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1), every 3 weeks]. Results In the pooled analysis, SP (n = 44-50) showed a longer progression-free survival [6.4 versus 5.1 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.666; P = 0.062], overall survival (14.8 versus 10.6 months; HR, 0.695; P = 0.099), and time to treatment failure (4.6 versus 3.6 months; HR, 0.668; P = 0.045) as well as a higher disease control rate (86.4% versus 68.1%, P = 0.149) compared with XP (n = 47-51). A significant survival advantage for SP over XP was apparent in patients with a performance status of 0, a differentiated-type tumor histology, or a primary tumor localization to the upper portion of the stomach. Conclusion Our pooled analysis supports the use of SP in the first-line setting for patients with HER2-negative advanced or recurrent GC with a recurrence-free interval of ≥ 6 months. Clinical trial registration The HERBIS-2 trial was registered with UMIN-CTR as UMIN000006105.Background Diagnosis of secondary ovarian tumors originating from colorectal cancer has previously been based upon history of malignancy and radiological findings of bilateral masses with a "stained glass appearance." The purpose of this study was to perform a detailed investigation of the radiological and macroscopic features of ovarian metastases originating from colorectal cancer, which remain to be fully characterized. Methods Study participants were 48 consecutive patients with ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent resection of ovarian tumors at the National Cancer Center Hospital between August 1998 and January 2019. Ovarian tumors were classified into subgroups using computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and macroscopic appearance. Results CT/MRI findings and macroscopic appearance were classified into the following four types type 1 (oval, homogeneous-solid) (n = 5); type 2 (heterogeneous-solid, small in size with multinodular surface) (n = 3); type 3 (solid-cystic, predominantly solid) (n = 18); and type 4 (cystic-solid, multilocular with solid components) (n = 22).

Autoři článku: Templesivertsen2665 (Mathis May)