Steffensenfuglsang7691

The advent of customized component corneal transplantation using simple cost-effective techniques will be the future trend in the years to come.

To analyze data on eyelid malignancy in India, clinical and pathologic features, and outcomes.

A multicentre study, from oculoplastic practices in four geographic zones in India. The centers perform similar documentation and protocol-based management for eyelid tumors. #link# Clinical features, pathology, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) class, management, and the outcomes were analyzed.

The study included 129 patients, with slight female preponderance and mean age 62.7 years. The median delay to the consultation was 9 months. Rural patients traveled a mean distance of 115.2 km; there was no difference between the city and outstation patients in the delay to consultation or follow up. Pathology included 55/129 (42.6%) sebaceous gland carcinoma (SGC), 47/129 (36.4%) basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in 15 (11.6%), and 12 (9.3%) other tumors. Commonest AJCC class was T2b/T3a in 80/111 (72%), invasion of the orbit was present in 16 (12.4%). Surgery with margin clearance was performed in 103. With a mean follow-up of 21.44 months, local recurrence and/or metastasis were seen in 12%. The diagnosis of SGC was strongly associated with adverse outcomes (odds ratio 7.36). On multiple logistic regression analysis, diagnosis of SGC (P = 0.011) was significant in having adverse outcomes.

The multicenter Indian data shows the highest prevalence of SGC, with the commonest AJCC class T2b. Most tumors were locally resectable at presentation. The histopathologic diagnosis of SGC is the factor strongly associated with adverse outcomes.

The multicenter Indian data shows the highest prevalence of SGC, with the commonest AJCC class T2b. Most tumors were locally resectable at presentation. The histopathologic diagnosis of SGC is the factor strongly associated with adverse outcomes.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Orthoptek (Magnocellular Stimulator OMS; Carditek Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore) as a treatment modality for amblyopia and strabismus.

Thirty-five patients with amblyopia of any type, reduced vision in one or both eyes with no binocular vision and or poor stereopsis were included in the study. All patients underwent a minimum of 10 sessions of therapy with each session lasting for a cumulative period of 60 min. At the end of the 10

session, patients were evaluated for improvement in visual acuity, stereopsis, Binocular single vision and amount of strabismus, if any.

The mean logMAR corrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.31 ± 0.34 and 0.32 ± 0.44 to 0.08 ± 0.12 and 0.07 ± 0.12 posttreatment in the right eye and left eye, respectively. Following therapy, 34 (97%) patients showed improvement in stereopsis, orthophoria was noticed in 28 (80%), and binocular single vision was noted in 33 (94%). All patients were followed up for 1 year with maintenance therapy and none showed any regression.

We believe that top-down impulses and the role of the attention area in the parietal cortex have not been studied well enough in the treatment of amblyopia. Our device addresses these issues and corrects the visual deficits in amblyopia. However, the study needs validation of this pilot study from independent centers. The same will be done at some stage.

We believe that top-down impulses and the role of the attention area in the parietal cortex have not been studied well enough in the treatment of amblyopia. selleck chemical addresses these issues and corrects the visual deficits in amblyopia. However, the study needs validation of this pilot study from independent centers. The same will be done at some stage.

In 1-12 years old children, we assessed correlation, regression, and agreement between spherical equivalents (SE) obtained on Mohindra's near retinoscopy (MNR) and the post cycloplegic refraction (PCRef), performed 72 h after a cycloplegic refraction (CRef) using cyclopentolate 1% drops.

In this prospective comparative study, Mohindra's near retinoscopy (MNR) was performed on 202 eyes of 101 children, from 50 cm with a streak retinoscope, in a dimly lit room, subtracting 1.25 from the trial lens used for neutralization, to obtain the final refraction. Subsequently we undertook CRef, half-hour after instilling 1% cyclopentolate, with a PCRef 72 h later. All refractive data were converted to SE for evaluation. We compared the SEs using correlation, linear regression, and agreement (Bland-Altman graphic analysis) and paired t-test. Significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

The mean SE on MNR was 1.71 ± 2.49 D compared to 1.43 ± 2.42 D on PCRef. A significant correlation with r = 0.97 (r

= 0.94, P < 0.001) existed. Agreement analysis suggested that MNR overestimates hypermetropia and underestimates myopia each by 0.3 D than the standard procedure of CRef-PCRef. The regression analysis suggested that SE on PCRef is 95% of that on MNR, less 0.20.

Our study suggests that MNR offers single point refraction very similar to CRef-PCRef, and may be considered as a viable option more often.

Our study suggests that MNR offers single point refraction very similar to CRef-PCRef, and may be considered as a viable option more often.

Intracameral antibiotic in cataract surgery has shown level I evidence as prophylaxis for postoperative endophthalmitis. Not much is known if one should also use topical antibiotics after intracameral injection. The purpose of the study was to determine efficacy of intracameral antibiotic with and without postoperative topical antibiotic in reducing the incidence of acute endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in rural India.

A.

In the study, 17,932 (42%) eyes received intracameral cefuroxime (ICC) and 24,534 (58%) eyes received intracameral moxifloxacin (ICM). Topical antibiotic was not prescribed to 17,855 (42%) eyes - 5723 (32%) eyes in ICC group and 12,132 (68%) eyes in ICM group. Acute clinical endophthalmitis occurred in 15 (0.035%) eyes - 1 / 3515 (0.028%) eyes and 1 / 2231 (0.045%) eyes that received and did not receive topical antibiotic, respectively. The difference in occurrence of endophthalmitis with/without topical antibiotics in each group (ICC 0.016% and 0.017%; P = 0.958; ICM 0.040% and 0.