Rouselaugesen8577

02) and between the number of SGNs in cochlear segments I (p=0.04) and II and the SPT score (p=0.03).

We identified that residual SGNs in the basal and middle turns of the cochlea might be determinants of speech perception.

We identified that residual SGNs in the basal and middle turns of the cochlea might be determinants of speech perception.

Asymmetric hearing loss is generally defined as a moderate-to-profound hearing loss in the poorer ear and a mild-to-moderate hearing loss in the better ear. Application of a bone conduction hearing aid is one of the possible treatments for the poorer ear in asymmetric hearing loss. However, the device essentially stimulates the contralateral better ear, precluding true binaural hearing. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the application and utility of bone-anchored hearing aids in the treatment of asymmetric hearing loss.

We retrospectively evaluated 215 implanted subjects in our clinic and extracted a series of 27 patients affected by asymmetric hearing loss and treated with bone-anchored hearing aids. All 27 subjects had a mixed hearing loss after middle ear surgery. The preoperative and postoperative audiological data of these patients were collected and analyzed.

The audiological tests showed an improvement in the performance of hearing perception of sound and speech in quiet and noise. Moreover, the subjects have positively answered the questionnaires administered to evaluate subjective benefits. All subscales of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit and speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale showed a significant improvement with the device.

Bone-anchored hearing aids are a suitable treatment for asymmetric hearing loss. When other devices cannot be utilized or are not indicated, the bone conduction devices may allow good audiological results.

Bone-anchored hearing aids are a suitable treatment for asymmetric hearing loss. When other devices cannot be utilized or are not indicated, the bone conduction devices may allow good audiological results.

To review the ocular abnormalities in children treated with cochlear implant.

A total of 51 children (29 boys, 22 girls) who were under 18 years old, presented previously with severe to profound hearing loss, and underwent cochlear implantation surgery were included in this study prospectively. A detailed ophthalmic examination, including refraction, best corrected visual acuity, ocular motility, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and dilated fundus examination, was performed for each patient.

Mean age of the patients was 80.10±38.64 (range, 18-168) months. A total of 13 (25.4%) children had at least 1 ophthalmic abnormality. The majority of the detected ophthalmic abnormalities were hyperopia and astigmatism (6 patients had hyperopia, 5 had astigmatism, and 2 had hyperopia plus astigmatism). Strabismus (esotropia) was found in 2 patients, 2 patients had refractive amblyopia, and 2 patients had nystagmus. Moreover, 3 patients had microcornea, 2 patients had cataract, and 1 patient had epiblepharon. Optic disc coloboma (3 patients), choroidal coloboma (1 patient), and pigmentary abnormality (1 patient) were noticed on fundus examination. Congenital rubella syndrome (2 patients), Waardenburg's syndrome (1 patient), and CHARGE syndrome (coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, growth retardation, genital abnormalities, ear abnormalities) (1 patient) were also present.

Children treated with cochlear implant should be consulted with an ophthalmologist to identify any treatable ocular abnormality.

Children treated with cochlear implant should be consulted with an ophthalmologist to identify any treatable ocular abnormality.

To evaluate the feasibility of performing cochlear implantation under conscious sedation (CS) as day surgery with same-day fitting.

All patients underwent cochlear implantation under CS between November 2017 and April 2018. The data collected included demographic information, preoperative clinical characteristics, surgical details, postoperative fitting information, and side effects, if any.

Nine patients had 11 cochlear implants (CIs) placed under CS (2 patients received bilateral CIs). One patient's data were excluded from the audiological results because conversion to general anesthesia (GA) was necessary. One patient (11%) vomited just before the end of the procedure. Deoxythymidine Seven patients had uneventful procedures. Eight (88%) patients were discharged home the same day. There was a statistically significant difference in recovery time between the CS group and the GA group (t=-2.26, df=12, p<0.05). In the CS group, there was no statistically significant change in the maximum comfortable loudness level for all electrodes from the day of the surgery to the following day. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the threshold levels of all electrodes from the day of the surgery to the following day (Z=-2.04, N=120, p<0.05). Further analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the four most apical electrodes (Z=-3.496, N=40, p<0.0001), but not in the middle or basal electrodes.

Cochlear implantation can be performed under CS with careful patient selection. This approach facilitates same-day fitting and day surgery by minimizing comorbidity.

Cochlear implantation can be performed under CS with careful patient selection. This approach facilitates same-day fitting and day surgery by minimizing comorbidity.

This study aimed to report the auditory performance in children with cochleovestibular malformation (CVM)/cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) who were implanted early at the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, using Categorical Auditory Performance (CAP)-II score and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scales, and to compare the outcome of their matched counterparts.

A total of 14 children with CVM/CND with unilateral cochlear implant (CI) implanted before the age of 4 years old were matched and compared with 14 children with normal inner ear structures. Their improvement in auditory performance was evaluated twice using CAP-II score and SIR scales at 6-month intervals, with the baseline evaluation done at least 6 months after implantation.

The average age of implantation was 31±8 and 33±7 months for the control group and the case (CVM/CND) group, respectively. Overall, there were no significant differences in outcome when comparing the entire cohort of case subjects and their matched control subjects in this study.