Rothbek4094

Findings suggest that the use of psychodynamic interventions is indicated in the context of a strong therapeutic alliance, especially for children with noncomorbid problems. Psychodynamic interventions may have an adverse effect if a therapeutic alliance is not established. For children with comorbid problems, keeping the relationship strong is important. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Findings suggest that the use of psychodynamic interventions is indicated in the context of a strong therapeutic alliance, especially for children with noncomorbid problems. Eganelisib purchase Psychodynamic interventions may have an adverse effect if a therapeutic alliance is not established. For children with comorbid problems, keeping the relationship strong is important. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The Teaching, Raising, And Communicating with Kids (TRACK) study was a full-scale longitudinal efficacy trial of a previously successful pilot intervention, which aims to assist mothers living with HIV (MLH) with serostatus disclosure to their children. The study looked to test the key components of the theoretical model with a more diverse sample than that of the pilot.

MLH (mean age = 39.27, SD 7.89) and their children (6-14 years) were recruited in Southern California and Atlanta and randomized to an intervention or wait-list control group (N = 176 dyads). TRACK used behavioral exercises within three individual sessions, with assessments at baseline, 3-, 9-, and 15-month follow-ups regarding HIV disclosure, targeted intermediate variables (communication, parental coping, family routines, and disclosure self-efficacy), and outcome variables for MLH's health and mental health, children's mental health, and family relationships/functioning.

TRACK MLH were four times more likely to disclose their HIV sered).

Sexual minority adolescents have previously been found to experience disparities in self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) compared to heterosexual adolescents. However, there is a paucity of data on SITBs amongst children. Thus, the aim of the current study is to assess the prevalence of SITBs in a large sample of U.S. children and to test whether rates vary by sexual orientation.

Data were drawn from the 2.0 baseline release of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. The full sample included 11,777

9-10-year-old children (sexual minority n = 150

). Children completed a computerized version of the youth Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS-5), including items assessing suicide ideation, suicide attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI). Unadjusted and adjusted models compared the prevalence of outcomes by sexual orientation. Models also compared the co-occurrence of NSSI and suicide ideation by sexual orientation.

Across all outcomes, sexual minority children reported elevated prevalence rates compared to heterosexual children, with odds ratios ranging from 4.4 to 6.5. Among children who reported NSSI, a greater proportion of sexual minority versus heterosexual children reported co-occurring suicide ideation (

= 3.8).

In a large sample of 9-10-year-old U.S. children, sexual orientation disparities emerged across NSSI, suicide ideation, and suicide attempts. Results indicate that sexual minority children are a vulnerable population for SITBs. Inclusion of children in prevention programs is encouraged. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

In a large sample of 9-10-year-old U.S. children, sexual orientation disparities emerged across NSSI, suicide ideation, and suicide attempts. Results indicate that sexual minority children are a vulnerable population for SITBs. Inclusion of children in prevention programs is encouraged. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Suicide researchers commonly use a variety of assessment methods (e.g., surveys and interviews) to enroll participants into studies and assign them to study conditions. However, prior studies suggest that different assessment methods and items may yield different responses from participants. This study examines potential inconsistencies in participants' reports of suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempt (SA) across commonly used assessment methods phone screen interview, in-person interview, self-report survey, and confidential exit survey. To test the reliability of the effects, we replicated the study across two samples. In both samples, we observed a notable degree of inconsistent reporting. Importantly, the highest endorsement rates for SI/SA were on a confidential exit survey. Follow-up assessments and analyses did not provide strong support for the roles of purposeful inaccuracy, random responding, or differences in participant experiences/conceptualizations of SI. Although the reasons for such inconsistencies remain inconclusive, results suggest that classification of suicidal/control participants that uses multiple items to capture a single construct, that uses a Graded Scale to capture a broad spectrum of thoughts and behaviors, and that takes into account consistency of responding across such items may provide clearer and more homogenous groups and is recommended for future study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Capability for suicide is frequently assessed using the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS) or the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale-Fearlessness About Death (ACSS-FAD); however, the measurement invariance of these self-report measures across relevant demographic groups has not been tested. The current study aimed to examine the measurement invariance of the ACSS and ACSS-FAD across (a) gender; (b) suicide attempt status; and (c) military deployment history in a sample of 2,551 participants (M = 28.92, SD = 10.73; 56.7% male, 68.5% White) who participated in one of several studies funded by the Military Suicide Research Consortium. Results indicated that the ACSS exhibited poor model fit; thus, further investigation of measurement invariance was not conducted. Furthermore, although partial measurement invariance of the ACSS-FAD was met for gender, scalar invariance was not supported across military deployment history, and no form of measurement invariance was met across suicide attempt status. Overall, given the lack of strong model fit and measurement invariance in the ACSS and ACSS-FAD across several demographic groups, new or modified self-report measures for capability for suicide may be warranted.