Poulsencameron7709

BACKGROUND Accurate implant placement in the bone is key to successful implant treatment. Once inserted, it can be difficult to correct the orientation of the implant axis, especially of a one-piece implant. Selleck AZD7762 Prosthetic-driven digital implant planning in combination with fully guided implant surgery can offer additional safety in such cases. CASE PRESENTATION The patient presented with a wide, edentulous interdental space extending from sites 13 to 16, which was to be restored with three one-piece zirconia implants supporting a zirconia fixed partial denture comprizing a cantilever to the mesial aspect. Digital planning based on DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) and intraoral surface data was performed to ensure optimal positioning. Guided implant placement was executed using a contra-angle handpiece with special attachments and a compatible, sleeveless drill guide. Impressions of the implants for the final restoration were acquired using an intraoral scanner. Reflection-related errors werion when acquiring impressions for implants of this type in the future.AIM An orthodontic treatment is described that combines the use of clear aligners and computer-guided piezocision to overcome the drawbacks of traditional corticotomy in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. The relapse at the 2-year follow-up was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 13-year-old male patient was selected and treated due to a molar Class II malocclusion with moderate dental crowding. Treatment time, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and periodontal indexes were assessed. To reduce the treatment time, computer-guided piezocision was utilized to perform flapless interproximal corticotomy cuts through the depth of the cortical bone. The orthodontic therapy using clear aligners began on the same day as the surgery. RESULTS The overall duration of the therapy was 6 months. There was an improvement in the periodontal indexes at the end of the therapy. An aggravation of OHRQoL only occurred for 3 days after surgery. The 2-year follow-up evaluation showed a relapse of 0.2 mm on the maxillary left lateral incisor and 0.25 mm on the mandibular right lateral incisor. CONCLUSION The present case report describes the advantages of a combination of computer-guided piezocision and clear aligners to treat a Class II malocclusion with moderate crowding.AIM Evaluation of appropriate models for computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in vitro studies by investigation of different model materials regarding suitability for intraoral scanners and dimensional stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS A typodont model was prepared to accommodate a 10-unit prosthesis. The model was duplicated using six different materials class IV die stone (DS), cobalt-chrome molybdenum (CoCrMo), epoxy resin (EPOX), polyurethane (PU), titanium (TI), and zirconia (ZI). An intraoral scanner was used to obtain three scans of each model. Reference datasets were generated using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). The first scan was compared with the corresponding reference micro-CT dataset to assess its trueness. The precision was measured by comparing all scans within one test group. For the evaluation of dimensional stability, micro-CT was used to generate three-dimensional (3D) datasets of the models at different time intervals over a 6-week period. The models were kept under constant conditions during the study. All datasets were analyzed with software that determined the deviation of two datasets by alignment using a best-fit algorithm. RESULTS The criterion of trueness was fulfilled by CoCrMo, EPOX, PU, and the typodont model. Scans of CoCrMo and ZI showed the best precision. PU and the typodont model did not meet the requirement of dimensional stability, whereas EPOX and gypsum were stable only for a period of 10 days. CONCLUSION The CoCrMo model was the only one that met all the criteria for an appropriate model for CAD/CAM in vitro studies. The other investigated materials either lacked dimensional stability or could not be scanned accurately and reproducibly.BACKGROUND The Dental Motion Decoder system (DMS-System) is a medical device based on magnetic field technology that records mandible movements. The data can be used to program an articulator or can be directly processed over a computer-aided design (CAD) interface. The present study aimed to assess the reproducibility of this system in vitro and in vivo. MATERIAL AND METHODS Protrusive and laterotrusive movements were simulated in vitro using an articulator (SAM SE) (Group M) and in vivo (Group P) on one test individual. Measurements were carried out in two ways 1) Measurements were taken after initializing and referencing the system using the reference points (RPs) once, followed by 30 protrusive and laterotrusive movements (M1 and P1); and 2) Thirty individual measurements were recorded using the RPs before each measurement (M2 and P2). Values for the sagittal condylar path inclination angle (sCPIA) and the Bennett angle (BA) were exported and analyzed. The reproducibility of the system was evaluated using the standard deviations (SDs) of the measurement series (sCPIA and BA for M1, M2, P1, and P2). RESULTS In vitro tests M1 (SD sCPIA = 0.08 degrees; BA = 0.06 degrees) and M2 (SD sCPIA = 0.26 degrees; BA = 0.11 degrees) showed significantly higher reproducibility (P less then 0.001) compared with the in vivo measurements P1 (SD sCPIA = 0.61 degrees; BA = 0.45 degrees) and P2 (SD sCPIA = 1.4 degrees; BA = 0.65 degrees). CONCLUSION Within the limitations of the present study, the deviation in vitro, representing the reproducibility of the DMD-System, is smaller than the biologic variance observed in vivo. Therefore, reliable measurements under clinical conditions can be assumed.OBJECTIVE The objective of this narrative review was to summarize the current status and future perspectives of additive manufacturing (AM) technologies with a particular emphasis on manufacturing zirconia-based materials. AM technologies include vat photopolymerization, material jetting, material extrusion, selective laser sintering (SLS), and selective laser melting (SLM) technologies based on either powder bed fusion (PBF) technologies or direct energy deposition, or sheet lamination based on binder jetting technologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature review was performed, specifically evaluating AM technologies assigned for processing zirconia. An electronic database search was performed using keywords and MeSH terms. The search was confined to full-text articles written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals between 1999 and 2018. RESULTS A total of 62 articles were included in this review, of which 56 described the AM processes and 6 reported on AM applications in the field of dentistry. A broad diversity of literature exists regarding AM technologies for ceramic materials, which complicates the establishment of a classification system for the current AM technologies for zirconia. The variations in the composition of zirconia slurries or mixtures across different technologies often made it difficult to identify the proper nature of such information. Mechanical properties of printed zirconia materials utilizing different technologies were investigated through a wide range of tests. Overall, the review indicates that manufacturing zirconia using AM technologies could be achieved without issues, but mechanical properties appear to be poor compared with conventional manufacturing procedures. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review indicate the necessity for further potential improvement in AM technologies for manufacturing zirconia reconstructions along with advances in material composition before zirconia could be considered as a material for standard care.When recording condylar movement paths with the aid of electronic measuring systems, it is often found that, especially in jaw opening and closing movements, excursive and incursive paths of movement are not congruent but run separately, independently of one another to a greater or lesser degree. The objective of the study was to investigate this phenomenon in the context of rotation vs translation behavior, also taking into consideration additional side-specific condylar movement patterns. For this purpose, the electronic movement records of habitual jaw opening of 259 participants of the associated project of the population-representative basic study SHIP 0 were evaluated. The condylar movement path (condylar tracing, ConTrac) at the arbitrary axis point, the excursion vs incursion behavior in the condylar tracing grid (ExInGrid), and the rotation vs translation behavior (RotTrans) were classified, and the translational condylar path and the maximum angle of rotation were determined metrically. Relationshipd ExInGrid or RotTrans and ConTrac was evaluated as weak or very weak. The rotation vs translation behavior influences condylar movement paths in the positional relationship of excursive and incursive components. The visualization of several condylar movement paths in the form of a condylar tracing grid helps to capture complex rotational and translational motion components of the real condyles more effectively than the assessment of a single condylar movement path.AIM The present study aimed to evaluate intraoral microsensors for the objective measurement of patient compliance during splint therapy and to comparatively analyze the duration of mandibular and maxillary splint application in patients with myofascial pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-two patients with sole myofascial pain without limited opening (Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders [RDC/TMD] Ia) were divided into two groups. To ensure patient comparability, all pressure-sensitive sites from the initial palpation were summarized as pain scores. The subjects in group 1 were treated with maxillary stabilization splints, and those in group 2 with mandibular stabilization splints. All splints were equipped with a microsensor without interfering static or dynamic occlusion. Wear pattern was recorded at three intervals of 30 days each. Following the observation period, the data were retrieved and statistically evaluated using multi-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS During the observation period, maxillary splints were applied in 44.4% and mandibular splints in 44.2% of the days. Regarding patient compliance, there was no significant difference between the maxillary and mandibular splints (P = 0.359). Patients with an increased pain score (P less then 0.0001) and female patients (P = 0.013) wore their splints significantly more often. The wear time decreased over the observation period, whereas only the initial and terminal interval differed significantly across both the mandibular and maxillary splint groups (P less then 0.0001). CONCLUSION The microsensor used in the present study was an effective and reliable tool for monitoring patient compliance in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). This method also allows for the reliable recording of intraoral splint application prior to the required bite elevations. The two types of splints analyzed in the present study had no significant influence on compliance.