Pecksharp2435

This review recapitulates the head-up tilt test, which is commonly used for evaluation of orthostatic syndromes and dysautonomia. Tilt test evaluates autonomic system responses to orthostatic stress. Epigenetics inhibitor Established tilt testing includes monitoring of heart rate and blood pressure; adding capnography and cerebral blood flow monitoring expands its diagnostic yield and allows assessing cerebral blood flow regulation. Common syndromes detectable by the tilt test are neurally mediated syncope (vasodepressor, cardiovagal, or mixed), orthostatic hypotension, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, hypocapnic cerebral hypoperfusion, and orthostatic cerebral hypoperfusion syndrome. This review describes relevant physiology, tilt test protocols, diagnostic criteria for orthostatic syndromes, grading test results, diagnostic accuracy, limitations of the tilt test, and safety considerations.

This review recapitulates the head-up tilt test, which is commonly used for evaluation of orthostatic syndromes and dysautonomia. Tilt test evaluates autonomic system responses to orthostatic stress. Established tilt testing includes monitoring of heart rate and blood pressure; adding capnography and cerebral blood flow monitoring expands its diagnostic yield and allows assessing cerebral blood flow regulation. Common syndromes detectable by the tilt test are neurally mediated syncope (vasodepressor, cardiovagal, or mixed), orthostatic hypotension, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, hypocapnic cerebral hypoperfusion, and orthostatic cerebral hypoperfusion syndrome. This review describes relevant physiology, tilt test protocols, diagnostic criteria for orthostatic syndromes, grading test results, diagnostic accuracy, limitations of the tilt test, and safety considerations.

Autonomic dysfunction and small fiber neuropathies are heterogeneous disorders with a wide array of potential etiologies. As with other neurologic diseases, autoantibodies specific to neural tissue, either in the setting of cancer or systemic autoimmunity, may cause autonomic abnormalities. Given the complex and varied functions of the autonomic nervous system, however, the presentation of these conditions may be quite variable. This, in addition to pitfalls of autonomic testing especially for the novice, can lead to inaccuracies in recognizing and characterizing these conditions. We now have a large number of autoantibodies available for testing with more in the pipeline thanks to unprecedented developments in the field of neuroimmunology. Those have been very helpful in uncovering potentially treatable mechanisms of autonomic disease, but also pose a challenge to the clinician given their multiplicity and variable specificity. Growing knowledge regarding autoimmune autonomic implications and the autonomice field of neuroimmunology. Those have been very helpful in uncovering potentially treatable mechanisms of autonomic disease, but also pose a challenge to the clinician given their multiplicity and variable specificity. Growing knowledge regarding autoimmune autonomic implications and the autonomic specificities of each antibody, in addition to the increasing attention to the relevance of antibody titers are of utmost importance for clinicians concerned with autonomic neurology. This review attempts to shed a light on the frequently encountered antibodies in relation to autonomic dysfunction.

The autonomic nervous system is a complex neural network that controls several organ systems. Its assessment includes a detailed history of autonomic functions, clinical examination, and autonomic tests. Most widely used is a battery of tests that assess cardiovascular reflex autonomic and sudomotor tests, which include deep breathing (assesses parasympathetic function), Valsalva maneuver, tilt test (both assess parasympathetic and adrenergic functions), and sudomotor testing for the evaluation of postganglionic sudomotor fibers. These basic tests represent a foundation of autonomic testing. Nevertheless, the autonomic nervous system also controls organ systems not directly assessed by basic tests. This review describes a number of auxiliary autonomic tests that can be used in addition to basic autonomic tests or can be used independently to explore particular autonomic functions or to answer a specific clinical question. The auxiliary tests described in this review evaluate cardiovascular, thermoregulatoryssor test, sustained handgrip maneuver, reverse tilt test, venoarteriolar reflex, laser Doppler flare imaging, microneurography, neck suction, lower body negative pressure, venous occlusion plethysmography, pharmacologic assessment of postganglionic sympathetic outflow, plasma norepinephrine, sympathetic skin response, video cinefluoroscopic swallowing test, esophageal manometry test, small bowel manometry test, wireless motility capsule test, urodynamic studies, penile plethysmography, intracavernosal papaverine injection, infrared video pupillography, corneal confocal microscopy, pupillary response to dilute pilocarpine and hydroxyamphetamine, Schirmer test, tear osmolarity test, and salivary secretion test. The protocol of each test is described in detail. This review can be used as a quick reference for the auxiliary autonomic tests.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has mixed effects on walking performance in individuals poststroke. This is likely the result of variations in tDCS electrode montages and individualized responses. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of a single session of tDCS using various electrode montages on poststroke walking performance.

Individuals with chronic stroke (n = 16) participated in a double-blind, randomized cross-over study with sham stimulation and three tDCS electrode montages. Gait speed, paretic step ratio, and paretic propulsion were assessed prestimulation and poststimulation at self-selected and fastest comfortable speeds. Changes in muscle activation patterns with self-selected walking were quantified by the number of modules derived from nonnegative matrix factorization of EMG signals for hypothesis generation.

There was no significant effect of active stimulation montages compared with sham. Comparisons between each participant's best response to tDCS and sham show personalized tDCS may have a positive effect on fastest comfortable overground gait speed (P = 0.