Patricklorenzen6420

t patients with chronic prescription opioid use may be more likely than nonprescription opioid users to be successfully stabilized on treatment and may thus benefit more from pharmacotherapy with buprenorphine than those with no prescription opioid use. Failing to account for this variation in future studies of buprenorphine treatment persistence may lead to significant residual confounding and biased results. Extending access to buprenorphine among those with prescription OUD may have a significant impact on opioid related morbidity and mortality.

Take-home naloxone (THN) is a clinically effective and cost-effective means of reducing opioid overdose fatality. Nonetheless, naloxone administration that successfully saves a person's life can still produce undesirable and harmful effects.

To better understand factors associated with two widely reported adverse outcomes following naloxone administration; namely the person resuscitated displays i. withdrawal symptoms and ii. anger.

A mixed methods study combining a randomized controlled trial of overdose education and naloxone prescribing to people with opioid use disorder and semi-structured qualitative interviews with trial participants who had responded to an overdose whilst in the trial. All data were collected in New York City (2014-2019). A dataset (comprising demographic, pharmacological, situational, interpersonal, and overdose training related variables) was generated by transforming qualitative interview data from 47 overdose events into dichotomous variables and then combining these with quaaying anger were associated with using more drugs after resuscitation.

Contrary to common assumptions, withdrawal symptoms and anger following naloxone administration may be unrelated phenomena. selleck chemicals llc Findings are consistent with previous research that has suggested that a lay responder's positive or reassuring communication style may lessen anger post overdose. Implications for improving THN programmes and naloxone administration are discussed.

Contrary to common assumptions, withdrawal symptoms and anger following naloxone administration may be unrelated phenomena. Findings are consistent with previous research that has suggested that a lay responder's positive or reassuring communication style may lessen anger post overdose. Implications for improving THN programmes and naloxone administration are discussed.This study examines the effectiveness of smartphone-based ecological momentary interventions (EMI) and assessments (EMA), delivered separately and combined, to provide recovery support following substance use disorder (SUD) treatment engagement. We recruited adults (N = 401) from SUD treatment programs in Chicago and, after engagement for at least two sessions, nights, or medication dosages, we randomly assigned them to one of four conditions that lasted 6 months (1) EMI only, (2) EMA only, (3) both EMI and EMA, and (4) control condition of neither EMI nor EMA. EMIs provided support for recovery through applications on the phone or links to other resources; EMAs were delivered randomly 5 times per day asking participants to indicate recent substance use and situational risk and protective factors. The primary dependent variable was days of abstinence in the 6 months following study intake. Rates of EMI and EMA utilization indicated high compliance, although EMI use decreased over time. There was a small direct effect of time across conditions (F(2,734) = 4.33, p = .014, Cohen's f = 0.11) and a small direct effect of time-by-EMI use (F(2,734) = 4.85, p = .009, f = 0.11) on days of abstinence. There was no significant direct effect of time-by-EMAs nor interaction effect of time-by-EMI-by-EMA. However, secondary path model analyses showed a small but significant indirect effect of EMA on abstinence via EMI use. Stepwise modeling identified a simplified model based on the proportion of weeks using ≥1 EMI and the EMI to listen to music, which predicted 7.2% of the variance in days of abstinence (F(2,195,) = 7.56, p less then .001). Combined delivery of EMI and EMA shows potential for increasing abstinence above and beyond the effect of SUD treatment engagement and for addressing the limited national capacity for recovery support.Clinical trials represent an essential component of improving treatment for substance use disorders (SUD). The SARS coronavirus-2 pandemic disrupted our ongoing clinical trial of smoking cessation and forced us to rapidly implement changes to assure participants access to ongoing counseling and monitoring via telephone calls and/or video chat sessions. Our experiences suggest that this pandemic will lead to changes for both future clinical trial participants and project staff. While challenges remain, it will be important to assessing the impact of these changes with regard to participant experiences and treatment outcomes.

Premature mortality associated with opioid-related overdose and suicide is a significant public health problem in the United States. Approximately 20-30% of individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) have a history of both suicide attempt and unintentional opioid overdose. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a standardized screen for suicide and overdose among patients receiving addiction treatment.

We conducted a cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of patients (n=113) recruited from two inpatient treatment programs. We used a modified version of the Patient Safety Screener (mPSS) to screen for suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and overdose. Study staff administered the screen in-person during treatment, and we linked results to administrative clinical data. Subjects (n=108) and members of their clinical care team (n=20) completed a screening acceptability survey. We recorded a positive mPSS if a patient reported suicidal ideation in the past two weeks, a suicide a treatment settings. Future research needs to determine whether screening improves provision of services and reduces self-injurious behavior.

Cannabis use disorder (CUD) and depression frequently co-occur in youth. How depressive symptoms change over the course of CUD treatment and how they impact substance use treatment outcomes is unknown. In the current study, we examine the temporal relationships between cannabis use and depression in adolescents receiving evidence-based treatments for CUD as part of a multisite clinical trial.

Six hundred adolescents (age 12-18) with a CUD were randomly assigned to substance use treatment from one of five evidence-based psychosocial interventions. We assessed self-reported cannabis use frequency and depressive symptoms at baseline (BL) and again at 3-, 6-, 9, and 12-months. A bivariate latent change model assessed bidirectional effects of baseline levels and time-lagged changes in depressive symptoms and cannabis use on depression and cannabis use outcomes.

Depressive symptoms (72%) and major depressive disorder (MDD) (18%) were common at BL. Both depression and cannabis use decreased over time and change in cannabis use was significantly associated with change in depressive symptoms (b=1.