Nissencowan3612

Z Iurium Wiki

These population-based approaches have the potential to provide much-needed clarity in interpreting the vast microbial diversity in human and environmental microbiomes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Conceptual challenges in microbial community ecology'.All microorganisms release many metabolites, collectively known as the exometabolome. The resultant multi-way cross-feeding of metabolites among microorganisms distributes resources, thereby increasing total biomass of the microbial community, and promotes the recruitment and persistence of phylogenetically and functionally diverse taxa in microbial communities. Metabolite transfer can also select for evolutionary diversification, yielding multiple closely related but functionally distinct strains. Depending on starting conditions, the evolved strains may be auxotrophs requiring metabolic outputs from producer cells or, alternatively, display loss of complementary reactions in metabolic pathways, with increased metabolic efficiency. Metabolite cross-feeding is widespread in many microbial communities associated with animals and plants, including the animal gut microbiome, and these metabolic interactions can yield products valuable to the host. However, metabolite exchange between pairs of intracellular microbial taxa that share the same host cell or organ can be very limited compared to pairs of free-living microorganisms, perhaps as a consequence of host controls over the metabolic function of intracellular microorganisms. Priorities for future research include the development of tools for improved quantification of metabolite exchange in complex communities and greater integration of the roles of metabolic cross-feeding and other ecological processes, including priority effects and antagonistic interactions, in shaping microbial communities. This article is part of the theme issue 'Conceptual challenges in microbial community ecology'.Phylosymbiosis, where similarities in host-associated microbial communities recapitulate the phylogeny of their hosts, is a newly recognized yet pervasive pattern in the field of host-microbe interactions. While phylosymbiosis has been documented across many systems, we still have a poor understanding of the mechanisms that underlie this emergent pattern. Host selection of the microbiome is a widely cited mechanism, yet other basic ecological and evolutionary processes (dispersal, drift and diversification) may also be at play. selleck products This paper discusses the roles that each of these processes and their interactions may play in yielding phylosymbiotic signals across hosts. Finally, this paper will identify open questions and methods that are required to better understand the relative contributions of these basic processes to phylosymbiosis. Given that phylosymbiosis has been shown to relate to functional components of host fitness, understanding the processes that contribute to these patterns will be important for our understanding of the ecology and evolution of host-microbe interactions. This article is part of the theme issue 'Conceptual challenges in microbial community ecology'.Microbial ecology, the scientific study of interactions between natural microbial communities and their environments, has been facilitated by the application of molecular and 'omics'-based techniques that overcome some of the limitations of cultivation-based studies. This has increased emphasis on community ecology and 'microbiome' studies, but the majority address technical, rather than scientific challenges. Most are descriptive, do not address scientific aims or questions and are not designed to increase understanding or test hypotheses. The term 'hypothesis' is increasingly misused and critical testing of ideas or theory is restricted to a small minority of studies. This article discusses current microbial ecology research within the context of four approaches description, induction, inference to the best explanation and deduction. The first three of these do not follow the established scientific method and are not based on scientific ecological questions. Observations are made and sometimes compared withonceptual challenges in microbial community ecology'.Recent theory and experiments have reported a reproducible tendency for the coexistence of microbial species under controlled environmental conditions. This observation has been explained in the context of competition for resources and metabolic complementarity given that, in microbial communities (MCs), many excreted by-products of metabolism may also be resources. MCs therefore play a key role in promoting their own stability and in shaping the niches of the constituent taxa. We suggest that an intermediate level of organization between the species and the community level may be pervasive, where tightly knit metabolic interactions create discrete consortia that are stably maintained. We call these units Metabolically Cohesive Consortia (MeCoCos) and we discuss the environmental context in which we expect their formation, and the ecological and evolutionary consequences of their existence. We argue that the ability to identify MeCoCos would open new avenues to link the species-, community- and ecosystem-level properties, with consequences for our understanding of microbial ecology and evolution, and an improved ability to predict ecosystem functioning in the wild. This article is part of the theme issue 'Conceptual challenges in microbial community ecology'.Microbial communities are complex multi-species assemblages that are characterized by a multitude of interspecies interactions, which can range from mutualism to competition. The overall sign and strength of interspecies interactions have important consequences for emergent community-level properties such as productivity and stability. It is not well understood how interspecies interactions change over evolutionary timescales. Here, we review the empirical evidence that evolution is an important driver of microbial community properties and dynamics on timescales that have traditionally been regarded as purely ecological. Next, we briefly discuss different modelling approaches to study evolution of communities, emphasizing the similarities and differences between evolutionary and ecological perspectives. We then propose a simple conceptual model for the evolution of interspecies interactions in communities. Specifically, we propose that to understand the evolution of interspecies interactions, it is important to distinguish between direct and indirect fitness effects of a mutation.

Autoři článku: Nissencowan3612 (Battle Alvarado)