Nanceguldbrandsen9570

The efficacy and safety of oral tranexamic acid (TXA) remain controversial because of the small number of clinical studies. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral TXA with intravenous TXA in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

We conducted a meta-analysis to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving oral and intravenous TXA in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty up to December 2019 by searching databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Library China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database and Wanfang. The mean difference or standard mean difference was used to assess continuous outcomes such as hemoglobin (Hb) drop, total blood loss, drain blood loss, and length of hospital stay, with a 95% confidence interval. Relative risks with a 95% coclude that oral TXA may be an optimal approach in total joint arthroplasty. However, more high-quality and multicenter RCTs are still needed to confirm our conclusions.

The current meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews), and the registration number was CRD42018111291.

The current meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews), and the registration number was CRD42018111291.

Many complications are associated with thoracic open decompression surgery, such as dural tears and neurological deficits. The clinical outcomes are also not satisfactory. Full-endoscopic decompression of the lumbar spinal canal has achieved satisfactory results for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. This surgery may be used for the treatment of thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) under local anesthesia. The aim of our study is to introduce the surgical techniques used for full-endoscopic decompression for thoracic OLF and to evaluate its safety and efficacy.

Fourteen patients with thoracic OLF (4 combined with dural ossification) underwent full-endoscopic decompression surgery. An interlaminar approach was performed. The anchoring method was used to establish the working passage. Spinal cord exposure began at a space between the ossification and the spinal cord, and dorsal and contralateral decompression were performed with the "Over the Top" technique. The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (11 points) was used to evaluate the efficacy during follow-up. At the same time, the visual analogue scale score for assessing back pain before and after the operation was evaluated.

The average operation time was 159.73 ± 62.09 minutes, and the hospitalization time was 7.43 ± 1.79 days. The follow-up period ranged from 8 to 22 months. Neurological function was improved. There were no serious complications. Dural tears occurred in 5 patients, intraoperative neurological deterioration occurred in 1 patient, and intraoperative headache and neck pain occurred in 1 patient.

Full-endoscopic decompression is an effective, safe surgical technique for thoracic OLF even the cases combined with dural ossification.

Full-endoscopic decompression is an effective, safe surgical technique for thoracic OLF even the cases combined with dural ossification.An increasing number of studies outline renal function as an important risk marker for mortality in acute heart failure (AHF). However, routine estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on serum creatinine is imprecise.This study aims to compare the prognostic impact of CKD-EPI creatinine based equation (eGFRcr), cystatin C based equation (eGFRcyst), and creatinine-cystatin C equation (eGFRcrcyst) for the mortality stratification in AHF.A total of 354 Patients with AHF were prospectively included between January 2012 and June 2016. Creatinine and cystatin C were measured using the same blood sample tube on admission. We quantified eGFR by the eGFRcr, eGFRcyst, and eGFRcrcyst equations. The continuous net reclassification improvement (cNRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were calculated to compare the discriminative prognostic value of different CKD-EPI formula.After a median follow-up of 35 months, 161 patients (45.5%) died. FF10101 Reduced eGFRcyst and eGFRcrcyst remained significant association with death after adjustment. eGFRcyst showed the best area under the curve value (0.706) for the prediction of all-cause mortality. Considering mortality reclassification, both eGFRcyst (IDI = 7.3%, P  less then  .001; cNRI = 19.6%, P = .012) and eGFRcrcyst (IDI = 4.3%, P  less then  .001; cNRI = 8.7%, P = .138) showed its tendency in improving risk prediction compared to eGFRcr. Compared to eGFRcrcyst showed, eGFRcyst further improved mortality stratification (IDI = 3%, P = .049; cNRI = 11.1%, P = .036).In patients with AHF, our study demonstrates the eGFR calculated by CKD-EPI cystatin C-based equation improved the risk stratification of mortality over both creatinine-based and creatinine/cystatin C-based equations.

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is one of the most common types of chronic neuropathic pain, which seriously affects quality of the life because of pain severity and poor response to the currently available treatments. Ju Re Ba Du therapy as a form of acupuncture therapy which is proved to be effective in RCTs and very suitable for patients, has been used in Postherpetic neuralgia in patients for a long time, therefore a systematic review is necessary to provide available evidence for further study.

The following databases will be searched from their inception to October 2020 Electronic database includes PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Nature, Science online, VIP medicine information, and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure).

pain intensity assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS); Additional outcomesData will be extracted by two researchers independently, risk of bias of the meta-analysis will be evaluated based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.