Mccallross4462

Over the past several decades, there has been an upward trend in the total number of spinal fusion procedures worldwide. Advanced spinal fusion techniques with or without internal fixation, additional innovations in surgical approaches, innovative implants including a wide variety of interbody devices, and new alternatives in bone grafting materials are some reasons for the increasing number of spine fusion procedures. Moreover, the indications for spinal fusion have broadened over time. Initially developed for the treatment of instability and deformity due to tuberculosis, scoliosis, and traumatic injury, spinal fusion surgery has now a wide range of indications like spondylolisthesis, congenital or degenerative deformity, spinal tumors, and pseudarthrosis, with degenerative disorders as the most common indication. This review emphasizes current lumbar fusion techniques and their development in the past decades.While the incidence and risk factors of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following spinal surgery have been well studied, the treatment of such thromboembolic disease in patients after spine surgery remains controversial. When initiating therapeutic anticoagulation after spine surgery, clinicians must weigh the catastrophic risk of a PE against the risk of bleeding complications associated with anticoagulation therapy. Here we report the case of a 56-year-old male who presented with symptoms of spinal cord compression secondary to metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). An inferior vena cava (IVC) filter was inserted preoperatively and urgent decompression at the thoraco-lumbar region was performed. Therapeutic clexane was started on postoperative day (POD) 7 and he was discharged. On POD 8, he was readmitted following acute bilateral lower limb paralysis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large posterior spinal epidural hematoma with severe compression of the conus at L1 level. Urgent posterior decompression was performed but subsequent recovery was slow and incomplete. His power improved gradually over the right lower limb with attainment of grade 4/5 motor power but still had hemiparesis on his left lower limb upon discharge out of hospital. This case highlights the risk of starting therapeutic anticoagulation following spinal surgery. LOXO195 Prior to starting treatment, the clinician must consider the appropriate dose, timing and alternatives available to avoid unnecessary complications.The authors present the case of an otherwise healthy 38-year-old female with an atypical extradural arachnoid cyst with multi-level involvement in the lumbar spine leading to left quadriceps weakness and dysesthesia. Upon presentation, a lumbar spine MRI with contrast and plain radiographs revealed extensive L4 bony erosion. An MR angiogram and cervical spine MRI with contrast were then obtained in order to rule out any aortic root or cervical spine pathology. With no other apparent clinically relevant pathology revealed by these additional tests, an L3-5 posterior decompression and fusion procedure was performed. Her preoperative symptoms were successfully resolved following the procedure, with no resultant surgical complications. The cyst is atypical not only due to its size and location, but also due of the significant bony erosion of the left L4 pedicle and vertebral body. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of an extradural arachnoid cyst in the lumbar spine with bony erosion of the pedicle and vertebral body. In cases such as this, a CT myelogram may be useful in planning the operative approach through visualization of the exact communication between cyst and dura. This approach may also aid in diagnosing and identifying atypical cyst presentations such as the one presented here.Spinal abscesses that involve the full length of the spine, from the cervical to the sacral regions, are rare and account for approximately 1% of spinal epidural infections. Urgent surgical decompression combined with antibiotics treatment is usually recommended in these patients and selection of the most suitable surgical approach is tailored on the extent and location of the fluid collection. We present a rare case of holocord spinal epidural abscess treated with cervico-thoracic-lumbar tandem tubular decompressive laminectomies with alternating incisions, which were tailored on the preoperative sagittal and axial extension of the abscess. This minimally invasive procedure allowed for the successful drainage and decompression of the epidural space in an adult patient presenting with acute worsening tetraparesis. After the surgery the patient's neurological examination improved and follow up radiological studies confirmed the successful decompression of the epidural space. Tailoring not only the level but also the laterality of the tandem tubular approach, may be beneficial in minimizing soft tissues trauma, blood loss, operative time and need for more extensive surgical exposure, while successfully treating rare holospinal epidural infections. Minimally invasive tailored decompression of holocord spinal epidural abscesses should be considered as a surgical option in selected patients presenting with acute neurological symptoms.

Two of the most commonly used techniques for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) include full-endoscopic interlaminar decompression (MIS) and conventional microsurgical decompression (CD). Although these procedures have proven efficacy for relief of stenotic symptoms, in this age of increased concerns for healthcare cost, weighing the respective accumulative costs is essential for deciding which approach to adopt. The aim of this study is to perform a cost analysis comparison between MIS and CD for LSS.

A decision analysis model comparing MIS and CD for patients with LSS over a 1-year time horizon was conducted. Relevant unit costs associated with each surgical procedure and each possible complication treatment were estimated. Regarding the respective complication rates for each procedure, data was retrieved from the literature. Reoperation was considered for epidural hematoma, inadequate decompression or iatrogenic instability requiring fusion. Nonoperative treatment for complications like infection was also considered.