Mccaffreycurry6403
Based upon the summit conversation, this is something that each PhD program will have to decide based upon its own purpose and the environment it is preparing graduates to occupy. Nevertheless, preparing for a too narrow and specific career trajectory may not accommodate flexibility in the marketplace.Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing programs were challenged to continue educating students at practice sites, and educational institutions limited or eliminated face-to-face education. The purpose of this article is to report on a university and community college nursing program and an academic medical center that implemented an academic-practice partnership with the goal of creating opportunities to continue clinical experiences for nursing students during the pandemic. Principles and implementation of this successful partnership provide direction for other nursing programs and practice settings that may continue to have challenges in returning students to clinical and keeping them in clinical as the pandemic continues.Research-intensive PhD programs need to prepare nurse scientists to bridge the chasms between research, and practice and policy in an increasingly complex healthcare system. In practice, nurse scientists are critical to building capacity for research, promoting excellence in patient-centered care, and achieving or exceeding national quality benchmarks. GW4064 chemical structure Moreover, they provide methodological expertise and insight to address pressing clinical questions. PhD-prepared nurses also leverage their research expertise and practice knowledge to transform health policy in roles as organizational executives and leaders, advocates, and communicators. Re-envisioning nursing PhD curricula is required to ensure that PhD students are capable of not only conducting rigorous and impactful science, but launching careers across sectors of healthcare. Here, we summarize viewpoints of a special session from the October 2019 PhD Summit "Re-Envisioning PhD Programs of the Future" sponsored by the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing and literature to invigorate thinking about ways to promote career transitions into nontraditional vital positions for nurse scientists. Advancing the health of patients and communities depends on preparing the next generation of nurse scientist to pursue career trajectories outside of traditional academic institutions.The demand to expand the nurse scientist pipeline over the past decade has generated numerous pedagogical innovations in nursing doctoral education. A PhD nursing education summit was held at the University of Pennsylvania in October 2019 to discuss pedagogical innovations. The main pedagogical innovations discussed by Summit attendees included 1) the expansion of both 3-year PhD programs and BSN to PhD programs; 2) changes in learning opportunities and curricula content; and 3) the role of postdoctoral fellowships. This overview examines the numerous opportunities and challenges generated by these innovations. Opportunities include producing scholars with research careers that are potentially longer than historically seen in the nursing profession, as well as the emergence of unique educational and mentoring opportunities both during and after doctoral studies. Challenges involve the impact condensed program timelines have had on both the content and delivery of curricula, as well as the research expertise and skillsets of nursing PhD program graduates. There is a need to conduct a national coordinated evaluation of PhD program using shared metrics in order to better evaluate the effect of these pedagogical innovations on the development of nurse scientists, and ultimately, the discipline.Ten years ago, in response to the growing discussions, a seminal report, The Research-Focused Doctoral Program in Nursing -Pathways to Excellence was endorsed by AACN members. A re-envisioning of PhD programs is urgently needed to ensure the advancement of nursing science and to situate research focused nursing PhD graduates for success - in academia and beyond. To address these issues, the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing held a summit in October 2019, Re-envisioning Research Focused PhD Programs of the Future, with stakeholders from 41 educational, governmental, professional and philanthropic institutions. Results from a pre-summit poll shaped the Summit agenda, which consisted of panels and roundtables. Prior to and throughout the Summit, attendees identified and discussed challenges facing research intensive nursing PhD programs, emerging innovations within programs, and suggested changes to re-envision the future training of nurse scientists. These changes include better preparing PhD program graduates to bridge the research and practice divide, redesign funding and support for accelerated PhD students, and to reconceptualize outcome measures and evaluations of graduates. A synthesis of roundtable discussions will be used to frame other manuscripts in this issue as well as to prepare a roadmap for next steps.Declines in PhD enrollment, funding and support for PhD students, and the quality and quantity of the nursing research pipeline has fueled the concern about providing high-quality education in research-focused nursing doctoral programs. To address the challenges and opportunities facing research focused PhD education, the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing convened an invitational summit, Re-Envisioning Research-Focused PhD Programs of the Future, of research-intensive institutions. Both as a dissemination strategy and as an effort to engage perspectives from other Schools with PhD programs, we presented a summary of the Penn Summit discussion at the AACN Doctoral Education Conference (AACN Doctoral Conference). Focused discussions at both events further identified opportunities for research focused PhD programs, including recruiting undergraduate students, establishing research-focused partnerships, creating clear evaluation methods. AACN Doctoral conference participants also discussed the need to discuss and identify competencies, common subject areas, and financial resources for PhD students and graduates. This synthesis of discussions, considerations, and challenges affecting research-focused doctoral programs of nursing serve as a basis and catalyst for further discussion and action to ensure PhD research focused programs are preparing successful nurse scientists of the future.The University of Pennsylvania sponsored a PhD summit in October 2019 to bring together faculty and leaders in PhD education as well as professional associations in nursing to discuss the state of PhD education. Participants were divided into groups and asked to address specific questions. This paper presents the discussion points and recommendations from the group focusing on innovation in PhD education. Innovations such as team mentoring models, design thinking courses, and structures that support students to progress from BSN through PhD programs are discussed. Recommendations include a need to intentionally structure faculty development earlier in their professorial careers, develop team models of advisement and longitudinal follow-up of alumni graduates form Ph.D. programs to examine the effectiveness of innovations.Given the complexity and rapidly changing pace of 21st-century healthcare, the need for research intensive Ph.D. prepared nurses has never been greater. Philanthropic funders and sponsors of Ph.D. nursing education have important insights into how investments in Ph.D. education have direct and positive impacts on healthcare, and consequently bring important perspectives to emerging roles for Ph.D. prepared nurses. To elicit these perspectives focused questions were posed to four leading philanthropic funders/sponsors of Ph.D. nursing education The Rita and Alex Hillman Foundation; The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Sigma Theta Tau- International Honor Society of Nursing, and the Jonas Nursing & Veterans Healthcare of Jonas Philanthropies. The interviews were conducted as part of a special session from the October 2019 PhD Summit "Re-Envisioning PhD Programs of the Future". A common theme that emerged from these discussions was the compelling need to prepare research intensive Ph.D. prepared nurses with advanced skills in leadership and innovation in order to leverage the larger impact of their work on health, health care and health policy. Lessons learned from the programs supported by these sponsors can be used to refine and implement future Ph.D. programs that provide the leadership and innovation skills required of research intensive Ph.D. prepared nurses.The following question was posed to work groups at an invitational summit of educators, policy makers, and funding agencies involved in PhD nursing programs from Canada, the Caribbean, Latin America, and the US Should global engagement competencies be included in PhD program curricula of research-intensive universities?" While the need for global engagement competencies ranked low among participants, our perspective is that there may be benefits from development of global engagement competencies. Many of the concepts identified for global engagement competencies are also important for US-based research. Nurses and midwives with PhDs are well positioned to conduct research that will impact the global burden of disease and close the health equity gap.PhD Summit attendees, as part of moderated roundtable discussions, responded to two questions What PhD competencies should guide the preparation of PhD prepared nurses to function in current and emerging roles? and How has innovation in programs and curricula changed the landscape to prepare and support PhD students for success? The purpose of this report is to summarize Summit discussion around these issues and assess the current relevance of 2010 AACN competencies and whether they are adequate to meet the needs of emerging nurse scientists.Nurses are well-positioned to be groundbreaking researchers, scientists, leaders, and innovators to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, and communities. Nurse scientists are needed to contribute to scientific discoveries that inform effective strategies to improve patient care and outcomes and to inform future policies. Thoughtful consideration is required about the preparation of nurse scientists to ensure they are equipped with the knowledge and skill sets to meet the needs of society. Evolving health needs and priority areas of inquiry along with an ever-increasing array of sophisticated methodologies and centrality of interdisciplinary teams to solve complex problems should drive how we prepare PhD students. This paper reflects a panel and subsequent dialogue with nurse leaders at the PhD summit held at the University of Pennsylvania in October 2019. Three aspects of PhD education and the advancement of nursing science are discussed 1) examining important elements to support nurse scientist development; 2) identifying key gaps in science that the discipline needs to address in educating the next generation of nurse scientists; and 3) preparing nurse scientists for the competitive funding environment.This article describes the creation and work of an Office of Faculty Affairs (OFA) and an Associate Dean for Academic Affairs (ADFA) within a Graduate School of Nursing. The OFA supports the development and career advancement of faculty and the ADFA serves as a faculty mentor and advocate to promote faculty excellence in teaching, scholarship, practice and professional service. The ADFA has focused responsibility to partner with faculty, academic programs, and administration to provide programs and resources that assist and promote faculty growth and accomplishment. The ADFA must be a cross-boundary manager and consultant committed to monitoring, evaluating, developing and implementing educational and administrative programs to meet both faculty and program requirements. Responsibilities of and initiatives created by the ADFA are presented, along with metrics used to evaluate the effectiveness of the office and the role.
