Martensenkennedy0743

The postmarketing assessment of biosimilars is important because posttranslational modification by glycosylation is altered by the manufacturing process. A retrospective study of 15 patients with gastric cancer receiving a combination anticancer therapy with trastuzumab was performed. The most common concurrent regimen was the S-1 and oxaliplatin combination; efficacy and adverse events were assessed in this group. There was no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival between patients receiving the reference formulation and patients receiving its biosimilar. The adverse events detected were similar in both groups. In the 6 patients who switched from the reference trastuzumab to its biosimilar, adverse events did not differ before and after the switch. This small-scale retrospective study found no differences in efficacy or adverse events between the reference trastuzumab and its biosimilar.The filter extraction method is a new, simple method for evaluating anticancer drug contamination in air. The method involves installing a filter in the exhaust port of an exhaust duct on a facility's air conditioner, then collecting and measuring fine particles of the antineoplastic agents adsorbed onto the filter. In this study, we analyzed the utility of maintaining continuous filter extraction for measuring cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil contamination. The filters were installed in 3 areas of an outpatient chemotherapy room and then left in place for approximately 5 months. Results revealed the presence of cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil in all 3 areas. However, the amounts and ratios of detected drugs differed among survey sites; this may have been caused by factors such as drug preparation, administration, and excretion. We conclude that the filter extraction method can be used continuously for monitoring anticancer drug contamination in air; thus, it can be utilized to monitor healthcare workers' occupational exposure to inhaled anticancer drugs. Indeed, the filter extraction method may be useful as a novel environmental monitoring technique.The treatment outcomes of unresectable pancreatic cancer(URPC)have improved due to the advent of gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel(GnP)and FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy. There have been increasing reports of URPC responding to chemotherapy or chemoradiation and that conversion surgery(CS)can help to achieve long-term survival. This study aims to assess the treatment outcomes of URPC in our department and consider CS adaptation. Thirty-six patients with URPC who were treated with GnP or FOLFIRINOX between 2015 and 2018 were included in this retrospective analysis. Thirty-five patients had GnP, while 1 patient had FOLFIRINOX. The median age of the patients was 68.0 years and included 17 males and 19 females. Twenty-eight of the tumors were located in the pancreas head and 8 in the body-tail. Twenty-one cases were locally advanced(UR-LA), and 15 cases had distant metastases(UR-M). CS was performed in 9 cases(25.0%). The 2-year survival rate for patients that underwent CS was 53.3%, and 34.1% for patients that did not undergo CS. The prognosis of patients who underwent CS tended to be better, but there was no significant difference(p=0.141). In the patients that underwent CS, there were cases of early recurrence in which the period of preoperative chemotherapy was short, and the tumor markers were not normalized. Therefore, it is thought that prolonging preoperative treatment could help to select more suitable patients for CS.Antiemetic therapy with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone is recommended for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in several guidelines to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. There is a lack of information about the efficacy and safety of antiemetic therapy with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone in patients treated with oxaliplatin in Japan. We recruited patients with untreated colorectal cancer who underwent oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. All patients were treated with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone. The complete response and complete protection rates were analyzed. A total of 52 patients were enrolled in this clinical trial. The complete response rate overall, and in the acute and delayed phases was 92.3%, 98.1%, and 92.3%, respectively. The complete protection rate overall and in the acute and delayed phases was 73.1%, 86.5%, and 73.1%, respectively. Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity did not occur. Antiemetic therapy with aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone is effective and safe in patients treated with oxaliplatin.Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICI)has been developed considerably. ICI has already been approved for malignant melanoma, lung cancer and renal cancer. We expected ICI to be taken for many cancers in the future. Selleck AG-1024 Therefore, the development of biomarker for them are needed. The recent large phase Ⅲ study IMbrave 150 evaluated atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sorafenib as the first treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). IMbrave 150 demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in both OS and RFS for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab compared with sorafenib in HCC patients. A paradigm shift in the treatment of unresectable HCC is about to occur. In this article, we discussed the significance and biomarkers of tumor immunity in HCC microenvironment.Cancer immunotherapy has become a central treatment of cancer with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and it has caused a paradigm shift in the treatment of cancer. On the other hand, it has been found that only about 10 to 30% of treated patients can obtain the benefit in most cancer types. At present, more than 2,000 clinical trials of combination therapies centering on immune checkpoint inhibitors are being conducted in the hope of further improving the therapeutic effect. A number of combination therapies will be available in the clinic, and a wide range of options will be available in the future. Since it is predicted that direct comparison data will not necessarily be obtained in future treatment options, treatment decisions based on the mechanism and patient status are even more strongly demanded. In addition, identification of biomarkers that can predict therapeutic effects is expected. This article described the current status and prospects of biomarker development in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.Currently, the immunotherapy approved for gastric cancer is immune checkpoint blockade( ICB) therapy. The effects of ICB depend on the T cell-mediated immune response elicited at the cancer site. Based on the results of previous clinical trials, it is clear that an enhanced immune response to cancer improves prognosis. Thus, the development of biomarkers to predict local immune responses may increase the significance of future immunotherapy for gastric cancer. Biomarker research has clearly progressed with the rapid development of genetic analysis technologies, enabling the analysis of data from clinical trials. Not only the molecular biomarkers known to date for ICB biomarkers, but immune cells that influence ICB therapy are also reviewed in this article.There have been many reports on the association between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and cancer prognosis. It is known that tumor infiltrating lymphocytes contain not only cytotoxic T lymphocytes but also bystander lymphocytes and immunosuppressive cells. In most of previous reports, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were defined as CD3 or CD8 T cells. It is generally thought that patients with cancer rich in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes have a good prognosis. Most tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are thought to be cytotoxic T lymphocytes. It is also reported that cancer rich in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes is responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In recent years, several reports revealed clonal replacement in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes after administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors. This change was also detectable in peripheral blood. From the viewpoint of lung cancer treatment, combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy became the standard therapy. We need to understand the tumor immune microenvironment in order to select the best treatment regimen for each patient. However, it is often difficult to obtain an adequate amount of tissue biopsy sample in standard of care. It is hoped that we can understand the tumor immune microenvironment using the peripheral blood. Thus, studying the association between treatment response, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and peripheral blood is considered to be important to research and develop peripheral blood biomarkers in lung cancer.Advances in sequencing technology have been reported to show cancer driver mutations with aging in a variety of normal tissues at very small clone sizes. In the normal esophagus, prior to carcinogenesis, clones that had acquired driver mutations in esophageal cancer, mainly NOTCH1 mutations, during early life appeared multi-centrically. With aging, the number of driver mutations increased and the clones expanded. In the elderly, most of the normal esophagus was replaced by clones with driver mutations. In contrast, in normal colorectal epithelium, about 1% of crypts contain driver mutations even in the 50s. In normal hepatocytes, age-related mutations are rarely detected. These results suggest that the frequency of detection of driver mutations in normal tissues varies greatly among tissues. The panorama of aging and cancer remains veiled.

Coma is the most serious disturbance of consciousness, which affects the life quality of patients and increases the burden of their family. Studies to assess the prognostic value of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in patients with coma have not led to precise, generally accepted prognostic rules. The study aims to assess the correlation between NSE and prognosis of coma and the predictive value of NSE for clinical prognosis.

A search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang Data from the establishment time of databases to December 2019. This analysis included patients with coma, regardless of how long the coma was. In total, 26 articles were retrieved and included in the review.

The meta-analysis revealed the NSE concentration of patients with coma is significantly higher than that of the control group (standard mean difference = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.12, p < 0.05). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of NSE in coma diagnosis was 0.5 (95% CI 0.39-0.61) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.71-0.94).

The NSE concentration of patients with poor coma prognosis is significantly higher than that of the control group. The high NSE concentration is not necessarily a poor prognosis for coma, but low NSE concentration indicates a high probability of a good prognosis for coma.

The NSE concentration of patients with poor coma prognosis is significantly higher than that of the control group. The high NSE concentration is not necessarily a poor prognosis for coma, but low NSE concentration indicates a high probability of a good prognosis for coma.