Locklearotte0046

22 to 3.10). The non-inferiority of ALGINATE versus NPWT was demonstrated. No AE related to the treatment occurred with ALGINATE versus 14 AEs with NPWT. There was no difference in the impact of the treatments on the patient's daily life. Conclusion This trial demonstrates that ALGINATE has a similar healing efficacy to that of NPWT and that is markedly better with regard to patient safety.Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) were first incorporated into direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction by the senior author in 2001 and have since become foundational to implant-based reconstruction. ADM composition has evolved recently and now includes perforated types, which some speculate decrease the likelihood of seroma. The authors performed a retrospective review of perforated (P-ADM) and nonperforated (NP-ADM) ADM-assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction patients to evaluate differences in complication rates. Methods Retrospective review of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction patients operated on by a single surgeon (CAS) from 2011 to 2018 was conducted. Patient and operative characteristics, including ADM type, were recorded. A propensity score matching algorithm accounting for potentially confounding variables was developed, followed by univariate analysis to evaluate the association between ADM perforation and postoperative complications. Results The review began with 409 patients (761 breasts). Following exclusion of patients with missing demographic information, lack of ADM in their reconstruction, and follow-up times of less than 4 weeks, 364 patients (680 breasts) were included for analysis. A total of 530 (77.94%) and 150 (22.06%) breasts received NP-ADM and P-ADM, respectively. After propensity score matching, there were 294 breasts, composed of equal numbers of P-ADM and NP-ADM recipients. Univariate analysis showed no association between ADM type and any postoperative complication. Conclusions The complication profile of direct-to-implant breast reconstruction appears to be unaffected by the use of P-ADM or NP-ADM. Current understanding of the association between ADM type and clinical outcomes would benefit from multi-institution, prospective, randomized trials.Symptomatic neuromas and pain caused by nerve transection injuries can adversely impact a patient's recovery, while also contributing to increased dependence on opioid and other pharmacotherapy. These sources of pain are magnified following amputation surgeries, inhibiting optimal prosthetic wear and function. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNI) represent modern advances in addressing amputated peripheral nerves. These techniques offer solutions by essentially providing neuromuscular targets for transected peripheral nerves "to grow into and reinnervate." Recent described benefits of these techniques include reports on pain reduction or ablation (eg, phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, and/or neuroma pain).1-6 We describe a technical adaptation combining TMR with a "pedicled vascularized RPNI (vRPNI)." The TMR with the vRPNI surgical technique described offers the advantage of having a distal target nerve and a target muscle possessing deinnervated motor end plates which may potentially enhance nerve regeneration and muscle reinnervation, while also decreasing amputated nerve-related pain.We introduced a novel protocol based on an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analytic system for facial expressions, Customized Precision Facial Assessment (CPFA), to evaluate and quantify the microexpressions of aesthetic concern. With the help of CPFA, physicians may be able to conduct static and dynamic assessments for the microexpressions of the ir patients and perform quantitative measurements before and after the treatments. Through the detection of microexpressions and its active action units of facial muscles, physicians are more likely to optimize the treatment with minimal intervention by precise localization of the foci of aesthetic concern. We presented 3 cases who received neuromodulators and injectable fillers, and we showed the differences in the area of treatment and outcomes of procedures between the CPFA-oriented treatments and human-facilitated ones. We found negative facial expressions decreased in all 3 cases in the group of CPFA while they decreased in only case 1 and case 2 in the group of human facilitated treatment. GSK-3 cancer The CPFA group has more significant decrease in negative facial expression scores than the human group. This pilot study demonstrates that CPFA can objectively recognize and quantify the facial action units associated with negative emotions, and the physician may be able to customize the treatment for individuals accordingly with promising results.Traumatic soft tissue defects of the hand and upper extremities are common and may be challenging to the reconstructive surgeon. Several reconstructive procedures such as use of local, regional, distant, and free flaps have been described. This study aimed to report the techniques, outcomes, and complications of pedicle abdominal flaps in reconstructing hand and upper extremity defects. Methods In this retrospective study, we included patients with different traumatic defects in the hand and upper extremities who underwent reconstruction by random pedicle abdominal flaps between 2002 and 2017 at Jordan University Hospital, Jordan. Data were collected and analyzed, and the variables studied included patient age and sex, etiology and size of the defect, complications, outcomes, and the need for further revision procedures. Appropriate statistical analysis was used to examine the potential factors affecting flap survival. Results We included a total of 34 patients with a mean age of 22.2 years, ranging from 1 to 54 years. Finger degloving was seen in approximately half of the patients. Flap survival rate was 85.3%. A small area of defect was the only risk factor that significantly affected the flap failure rate. Conclusions Thin pedicle abdominal flaps are a valid, affordable, and safe option in upper extremity traumatic defects, especially in situations where microsurgical techniques are unavailable or contraindicated. Extra care should be taken when the defect surface area is small.