Klosterslot4655

Treatment guidelines (GL) in psychiatry represent a useful and functional tool to be explored and enhanced in terms of the contribution of patient care and the promotion of scientific improvement. However, they show some limitations, both clinical and forensic. The objective of this paper is to examine the objectives, the clinical limitations and the applicability of the GL on professional liability (forensic aspects). From a clinical point of view, the GL have objectives that are functional to the promotion of physical and mental health, among which the constitutional observance of the right to health, the improvement of public health, the implementation of best clinical practices, the promotion of scientific research, the professional training of operators in the field of physical and mental health. However, GL cannot replace a contextualized clinical judgment. GL must be applied, in the single clinical case, in light of their multiple criticalities, including the limits of the methodology used for their formulation, the differences between the GL' recommendations, the difficulty of their application in daily clinical practice, the lack of specific treatment interventions. From a forensic psychiatric point of view, GL, as currently conceived, cannot be used in terms of professional liability without their interpretation on a legal basis with forensic psychiatric methodology, similarly to any other clinical and scientific information, with its qualifications and criticalities.The relationship between mental illness and violent behavior is a complex phenomenon. read more Scientific literature indicates that the presence of a mental disorder, even severe, is not sufficient, alone, to predict or motivate violent behavior, which seems to be more associated with other intermediate variables. The phenomenon of psychiatrization of violent behavior can be defined, from a psychiatric-forensic point of view, as the prejudicial and erroneous attribution to mental illness as a causal factor in relation to violent behavior. This phenomenon has consequences in psychiatric clinical practice, but also at the level of social stigmatization, management of organizational and economic resources, and the judicial system. In this paper, clinical criticalities related to the psychiatrization of violent behavior will be analyzed, including the need to differentiate clinical etiology and legal causality, predictability and avoidability, protective clinical factors and clinical risk factors, the limits of categorical psychiatric diagnosis, the need for specific victimological information, the criticalities of pharmacotherapy. Some forensic criticalities will also be analyzed, including errors in clinical and forensic methodology (psychiatrization of the symptom, prejudicial contamination, diagnostic overshadowing, legal causalization of protective and risk factors, the use of categorical diagnosis in the forensic field, the psychiatrization of non-pathological human experiences, the criminalization of the subject with mental disorder). In conclusion, it is highlighted that an individual can have a psychic disorder, even severe, but this disorder is not necessarily in a causal relationship with violent behavior. The lack of a causal relationship makes predictability of violent behavior difficult, even impossible depending on the case, both in the general population and in individuals with psychiatric disorders.The application of the neuroscience in forensic sciences has long opened up new scenarios within the legal world. While on one hand we tend to emphasize the benefits of the new research methods based on the recent neuroscience knowledge, on the other hand the use of these new tools has sparked a justified debate at the international level that touches all the areas that directly or indirectly approach forensics. Factors like lack of responsability or mitigation provided by science are part of those topics that, thanks to neurosciences, are back in the spotlight on a highly empirical basis. At the same time, these factors mentioned above influence our way to interpret reality. NBAM takes place within this debate as a new scientifically proven protocol and technologically supported, making way for an objective development of the neuroscience research.Instances in the increase of homophobic bullying mean a major interest in order to develop strong bullying prevention programming which should be a major priority for adults, governments and institutions responsible to promote and ensure a responsible development of society. The complexity of the problem requires a multidisciplinary approach of a comprehensive nature. Starting from the construction of gender identities, and taking into account and understanding the biological aspects, external influences, and arising contrasts during the process, a young person faces adolescence a transition period when sexual orientation or preference faces higher risks as the person has to come to terms with a mismatch between scales of knowledge. The outcome will result in an inter-generational conflict which becomes a prejudice. By acquiring the desired characteristics of mind and body, adolescents develop their own cognitive skills. Thus we can consider homophobic bullying in its psycho-sociological implications. The aim of this paper is to delineate an explanation of the topic in a scientific, educational and professional way, and at the same time to take into account all legal and institutional issues.The objective of the present study consists of the juridic-anthropological analysis of the infanticide, a phenomenon that nowadays is highly existent within the context of crime-settings. Particular consideration has been given to the legal developments of the infanticide act, which occurred simultaneously with the mutation of the socio-cultural contexts. Because the legislative process of the infanticide act has not evolved since 1981, it was possible to underline the criticisms and the inadequacy of such norm. Indeed, the legal norm has not always been able to provide an exhaustive answer concerning cases of infanticide. The process of humanisation of the law led to the introduction of a legal system, which describes the infanticide act as a condition of material and moral abandonment. This has become uncertain and ambiguous to interpret, risking to relegate the legislative matters of infanticide only to exceptional cases. The current study aims to highlight the criticisms and hypothesised different reform perspectives.