Kiilerichratliff6986

8 ± 4.83) (p  less then  0.001). learn more Concerning gender, age, and SES, photos with fluorosis had significantly lower mean TAS than without fluorosis (p  less then  0.001, less then 0.001, less then 0.001 and  less then  0.001), respectively. Conclusion Children in our study perceived that fluorosis could have a negative impact on their appearance. © 2020 Craniofacial Research Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Background Orbitozygomatic complex fractures are one of the most commonly encountered injuries of the craniofacial skeleton. The aim of this study was to implement the orbital volume as an objective evaluation modality for the assessment of the accuracy of unilateral Orbitozygomatic complex fracture fixation, by comparing the postoperative values with the contralateral normal side and the pretreated values. Materials and methods A retrospective radiographic, chart review was performed in order to investigate the primary outcome of the objective quantification of the accuracy of Orbitozygomatic complex fracture reduction utilizing orbital volume analysis. Comparing the postoperative orbital volume values with the preoperative, and the contralateral normal ones was set as the study secondary outcome, along with the percentage of changes in the orbital volume of unilateral Orbitozygomatic complex fracture treated patients. Data reliability was performed using Interclass correlation coefficient and Statistical significance was set at 5% level. Results Seventeen records met the inclusion criteria. While a statistically significant difference was found between the preoperative orbital volume values of the affected side and that in the normal unaffected side (P  less then  0.001), a statistically insignificant difference was encountered between the postoperative values and the control side (P = 0.333). An average percentage of decrease of 6.1%. was reported in the postoperative records when compared to the preoperative ones, with a statistically significant difference (P  less then  0.001). the study reported high inter (ICC = 0.97) and Intra (ICC = 0.97) observer reliability. Conclusion Orbital volume analysis offers a valid modality for the objective evaluation of the efficiency of Orbitozygomatic complex fracture management. © 2020 Craniofacial Research Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Mucormycosis is a rapidly progressing and lethal infection caused by fungi of the order mucorales. The disease occurs mostly in patients with uncontrolled diabetes or other predisposing systemic conditions. We report a case of rhinofacial mucormycosis in a 39-year-old diabetic patient. The diagnosis was established by clinical examination, imaging, and confirmed by mycological examination. Rhizopus arrhizus was isolated. He was successfully treated with amphotericin B, surgical resection, diabetes control and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. © 2020 The Authors.Human Sporotrichosis is an infection caused by dimorphic fungus, Sporothrix schenckii complex, via direct inoculation. We are herein report proven 2 cases of sporotrichosis along with a literature review about human sporotrichosis in the southeast Asian region. The first case was a 76-year-old female with a non-progressive erythematous plaque at the right ankle. The second case was a 36-year-old female with sporotrichoid lesion for six weeks. Both were treated with itraconazole with an excellent outcome. © 2020 The Authors.We report a rare case of C. krusei knee arthritis treated with instillation of micafungin and arthroscopy. A 49-year-old man hospitalized for treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia developed knee arthritis with C. krusei. He was treated with a combination of arthroscopic debridement, intravenous as well as intra-articular micafungin. Serum and intra-articular concentrations of micafungin were determined. After instillation of micafungin in the knee and arthroscopic debridement, the patient completely recovered. © 2019 The Authors.Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is thought to be a component of low back pain in 20% of people who suffer with it chronically. There is no consistent objective diagnostic testing that includes SIJ pain as the diagnosis and thereby it can become a diagnosis of exclusion. Treatment of SIJ pain is variable, and no set method or protocol of treatment has been found to be efficacious or reliable. Thus, the healthcare provider is often left to create an individual treatment plan based on their own experiences and expertise. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe and discuss nonoperative treatment options for patients with SIJ pain. Further, coordination of treatment options and progression of treatment will be offered. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.The sacroiliac joint is a complex, variable, and irregular structure, thought to be the source of 15% to 30% of low back, pelvic, and radicular pain. Several predisposing factors, including prior spinal surgery and particularly lumbar fusion, can contribute to joint inflammation and acceleration of joint degeneration. Evaluation of the sacroiliac joint as a pain generator using history and physical alone can prove difficult, because a number of other pathologies can have a similar presentation. Whereas a number of tests are used to examine the joint, no single test alone has proven validity. Imaging alone has also not been proven efficacious, particularly in nonspondyloarthropathy-mediated pain. Although no "gold standard" exists, diagnostic sacroiliac joint block has been shown to be a useful confirmatory tool in assessing sacroiliac (SI) joint-mediated pain. Sacroiliac joint injection with local anesthetic and steroids can be used as a possible therapeutic endeavor to manage pain and inflammation. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.Background Fusion of the sacroiliac (SI) joint as a treatment for low back pain remains controversial. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the current literature and clinical outcomes of SI joint fusion surgery. Methods We conducted a literature review and included studies with the term "sacroiliac joint fusion" that had at least 12 months of clinical follow-up, reported on minimally invasive techniques, and included patient-reported outcome measures. Results Two approach types (dorsal and lateral) and numerous different implant manufacturers were identified. Most studies included level 4 data, with a small number of level 2 prospective cohort studies and 2 prospective level 1 studies. Every reviewed study reported clinical benefit in terms of improved pain scores or improvement in validated disability measures. Complication rates were low. Conclusions Minimally invasive SI joint fusion provides clinically significant improvement in pain scores and disability in most patients, across multiple studies and implant manufacturers.