Kempcarrillo3051

TCM constitution is a new branch of TCM. It provides enlightenment on individualized medicine, including the development of new models of individualized research based on nine constitutions, the acquisition of comprehensive health information for individuals, and establishment of a consistent individualized diagnosis and treatment system. Further, we propose a Chinese-style "precision medicine" based on individualization using the TCM constitutions.Background Data on the effectiveness of oral ibuprofen treatment for patent ductus arteriosus are limited, and the factors affecting its effectiveness remain unclear. Objective The aim was to identify the potential factors affecting the clinical effectiveness of oral ibuprofen in preterm infants. Setting Neonatal intensive care unit in a prefecture-level maternal and child healthcare hospital in China. Method Over a 5-years period, the medical records of 327 preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of our hospital to receive a single course of oral ibuprofen were retrospectively reviewed. Main outcome measures The prevalence of risk factors affecting the effectiveness of oral ibuprofen. Results In total, 201 (61.47%) preterm infants were considered to have undergone "effective therapy" and classified accordingly, whereas 11 (3.36%) showed certain adverse events. Factors affecting therapeutic effectiveness were postnatal age at the initiation of treatment and Day 1/Day 0 ratio of urine output/fluid intake during the treatment course, with odds ratios of 0.892 (95% CI 0.835-0.953; P = 0.001) and 0.473 (95% CI 0.265-0.845; P = 0.011), respectively. Conclusion A single course of oral ibuprofen for patent ductus arteriosus closure among preterm infants is effective and safe. Preterm infants with postnatal age of ≤ 9 days at the initiation of treatment and Day 1/Day 0 ratio of ≤ 0.708 of the urine output/fluid intake during the treatment course can be considered predictors of effectiveness of patent ductus arteriosus.The ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has made a serious public health threat worldwide with millions of people at risk in a growing number of countries. Though there are no clinically approved antiviral drugs and vaccines for COVID-19, attempts are ongoing for clinical trials of several known antiviral drugs, their combination, as well as development of vaccines in patients with confirmed COVID-19. This review focuses on the latest approaches to diagnostics and therapy of COVID-19. We have summarized recent progress on the conventional therapeutics such as antiviral drugs, vaccines, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody treatments, and convalescent plasma therapy which are currently under extensive research and clinical trials for the treatment of COVID-19. The developments of nanoparticle-based therapeutic and diagnostic approaches have been also discussed for COVID-19. We have assessed recent literature data on this topic and made a summary of current development and future perspectives.In this paper I aim to show why pediatric suffering must be understood as a judgment or evaluation, rather than a mental state. UNC1999 Histone Methyltransferase inhibitor To accomplish this task, first I analyze the various ways that the label of suffering is used in pediatric practice. Out of this analysis emerge what I call the twin poles of pediatric suffering. At one pole sits the belief that infants and children with severe cognitive impairment cannot suffer because they are nonverbal or lack subjective life experience. At the other pole exists the idea that once child suffering reaches some threshold it is ethical to eliminate the sufferer. Concerningly, at both poles, any particular child vanishes from view. Second, in an attempt to identify a theory of suffering inclusive of children, I examine two prominent so-called experiential accounts of suffering. I find them both wanting on account of their absurd entailments and their flawed assumptions regarding the subjective experiences of people who cannot communicate expressively. Finally, I extend arguments found in Alastair MacIntyre's Dependent Rational Animals to argue that child suffering can be understood only as a set of absences-absences of conditions such as love, warmth, and freedom from pain. An evaluation of these absences reveals the exquisite dependency of children. It also discloses why pediatric suffering is necessarily a social and political event. Unlike adults, children will never be either the authors or the mitigators of their own suffering. Rather, children must rely wholly on others in order to resist suffering, grow, and flourish.In this essay, I argue that exploring institutional racism also needs to examine interactions and communications between patients and providers. Exchange between bioethicists, social scientists, and life scientists should emphasize the biological effects-made evident through health disparities-of racism. I discuss this through examples of patient-provider communication in fertility clinics in South Africa and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic to emphasize the issue of mistrust between patients and medical institutions. Health disparities and medical mistrust are interrelated problems of racism in healthcare provision.In a recent article for this journal, Bryan Pilkington (2019) makes a number of critical observations about one of our arguments for non-traditional medical conscientious objectors' duty to refer. Non-traditional conscientious objectors are those professionals who object to indirectly performing actions-like, say, referring to a physician who will perform an abortion. In our response here, we discuss his central objection and clarify our position on the role of value conflicts in non-traditional conscientious objection.

We sought to indirectly compare and rank antiarrhythmic agents focusing exclusively on adults with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in order to identify the most effective for pharmacologic cardioversion over different time settings (4h as primary, and 12, 24h as secondary outcomes).

We searched several databases from inception to March 2020 without language restrictions, ClinicalTrials.gov, references of reviews, and meeting abstract material. We included randomized controlled trials of patients with AF lasting ≤7days comparing either two or more intravenous (i.v.) or oral (p.o.) pharmacologic cardioversion agents or an agent against placebo. For each outcome, we performed network meta-analysis based on the frequentist approach.

Forty-one trials (6013 patients) were included in our systematic review. Moderate confidence evidence suggests that i.v. vernakalant and flecainide have the highest conversion rate within 4h, possibly allowing discharge from the emergency department and reducing hospital admissions.