Joyceaagaard3435

Although more than 100 cases of genitourinary neurofibromas have been reported, only 16 cases of solitary neurofibroma arising in the penis have been reported in English literature. There can be diffuse or localised pelvic involvement in cases of neurofibromatosis and sometimes these masses can extend into and disfigure the external genitalia. We report an unusual case of plexiform neurofibroma arising from penis and review the literature on penile neurofibromas.Filtered back projection was used in computed tomography (CT) but produced low-dose CT images that were noisy and included artifacts. Iterative reconstruction was introduced, which reduced noise and demonstrated dose reduction; however, reconstruction times were lengthy and noise texture appeared unnatural. Now, artificial intelligence (AI), is being applied to CT image reconstruction. These algorithms are fast and produce images comparable to those produced by iterative reconstruction. This article outlines image reconstruction techniques, including a generalized framework for deep learning. Ethics of AI in radiology also is discussed.Fetal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has evolved into a valuable complementary diagnostic tool when sonography findings are inconclusive. Veliparib Technological advances in MR imaging pulse sequences have made it possible to obtain quality images from fetal imaging. The ability of MR imaging to create higher resolution images is useful in fetal neural imaging to characterize malformations, hemorrhages, and other pathologies. Although no evidence supports the concerns that MR imaging harms fetuses, caution should still be taken.Hydronephrosis, or dilation of the renal collecting system, can be diagnosed using various modalities, including sonography, radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear medicine technology. This article explores the causes of hydronephrosis and its effects on the urinary system, presenting signs, symptoms, diagnostic techniques, and the role of various imaging specialists. In addition, the grading scale for hydronephrosis is presented and treatment options are explained.

To point out the need for standardized terminology for digital image analysis and to collect data by surveying radiologic technology professionals for a more comprehensive, national-breadth study.

A mixed-method pilot study was conducted, in which a survey was emailed to 4 Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology-accredited radiography programs in July and August 2019. Eight educators and 28 radiologic technologists responded, and acceptance was evaluated on 3 of the proposed terms signal, signal value, and signal variance (later changed to signal differences). Quantitative data results were analyzed in Microsoft Forms and percentage of acceptance rates calculated. Respondents who did not accept the proposed terms were asked to provide reasoning in open-ended responses, which were analyzed using manual coding and categorization.

The term

received an 88% acceptance rate among educators and a 96% rate among radiographers.

was accepted by 88% of educators and 79% of radiographers.ate a need to standardize terminology related to digital image quality factors. However, these preliminary results should be interpreted with caution because of the low response rate. Readers can participate in helping to establish a universal language for digital image analysis by scanning the quick response (QR) code or clicking the link at the end of the article and completing the survey.

The findings of this pilot study indicate a need to standardize terminology related to digital image quality factors. However, these preliminary results should be interpreted with caution because of the low response rate. Readers can participate in helping to establish a universal language for digital image analysis by scanning the quick response (QR) code or clicking the link at the end of the article and completing the survey.

To compare scholarly productivity among dental hygiene, medical imaging and radiation therapy, medical laboratory science, nursing, and respiratory care educators.

Using a mixed-methods approach, educators were surveyed to compare their engagement in scholarly activities and identify motivators, employer support measures, and barriers associated with scholarship engagement. Quantitative data were analyzed using percentages, descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis H tests, and Welch

tests. Thematic analyses were performed on the qualitative responses.

Of the 360 completed surveys, 295 (81.9%) participants indicated that they engaged in scholarly activities. Medical laboratory science educators wrote significantly more peer-reviewed journal articles than did medical imaging and radiation therapy educators (

= .004). Medical laboratory science educators ranked career advancement as a significantly higher motivator than did nursing educators (

= .045); nursing educators ranked personal satisfaction asgists and radiation therapists who have an interest in conducting research and publishing their results. This opportunity can advance scholarly productivity in the profession.

Communicating the value of scholarship engagement to medical imaging and radiation therapy educators is important so that the profession can advance to its full potential as a distinct allied health profession.

Communicating the value of scholarship engagement to medical imaging and radiation therapy educators is important so that the profession can advance to its full potential as a distinct allied health profession.

To examine radiologic science programs' mitigation activities and educators' experiences related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response planning.

Using a mixed-methods approach, educators in magnetic resonance, medical dosimetry, radiation therapy, and radiography programs were surveyed to capture their experiences and mitigation strategies related to COVID-19 response planning. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics and percentages. Thematic analyses were performed on the qualitative responses.

A total of 274 educators responded. Educators reported being somewhat comfortable with modifying clinical experiences (79, 28.8%), moderately comfortable with adjusting assessment procedures (112, 40.9%), and extremely comfortable with changing delivery of didactic content (115, 42%). Incidentally, 220 (80.3%) educators thought adjusting to a new course delivery approach (eg, face-to-face to online format) was the greatest challenge for faculty during the pandemic. Notably, half of the educators in this study questioned the quality of online (remote) learning.