Heinramirez0752

All these cases were offered risk-reducing measures and put under life-long surveillance as per protocol. Their family members were also offered genetic counseling and subsequent testing if they agreed. Cancer genetic counseling service was a new exercise, and hence, several challenges were faced. The clinical utility of genetic testing, coupled with counseling, should be established by trials. Documenting the achievements of counseling by surrogate parameters like "improved recruitment rate of patients for genetic tests" and "improved patient satisfaction levels" will go a long way in garnering the much needed institutional support.CanAssist Breast (CAB) has thus far been validated on a retrospective cohort of 1123 patients who are mostly Indians. Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) of more than 95% was observed with significant separation (P  less then  0.0001) between low-risk and high-risk groups. In this study, we demonstrate the usefulness of CAB in guiding physicians to assess risk of cancer recurrence and to make informed treatment decisions for patients. Of more than 500 patients who have undergone CAB test, detailed analysis of 455 patients who were treated based on CAB-based risk predictions by more than 140 doctors across India is presented here. Majority of patients tested had node negative, T2, and grade 2 disease. Age and luminal subtypes did not affect the performance of CAB. On comparison with Adjuvant! Online (AOL), CAB categorized twice the number of patients into low risk indicating potential of overtreatment by AOL-based risk categorization. We assessed the impact of CAB testing on treatment decisions for 254 patients and observed that 92% low-risk patients were not given chemotherapy. Overall, we observed that 88% patients were either given or not given chemotherapy based on whether they were stratified as high risk or low risk for distant recurrence respectively. Based on these results, we conclude that CAB has been accepted by physicians to make treatment planning and provides a cost-effective alternative to other similar multigene prognostic tests currently available.Breast cancer is no longer considered a single disease, and with better understanding of cancer biology, its management has evolved over the years, into a complex individualized use of therapeutics based on variable expressions of predictive and prognostic factors. With the advent of molecular and genetic research, the complexity and diversity of breast cancer cells and their ability to survive and develop resistance to treatment strategies became more evident. At the same time, targeted therapies evolved, as specific targets were discovered such as HER2 receptor, and androgen receptor. More recent is the development of immunotherapy which aims at strengthening the host immune system to identify and kill the tumor cells. In breast cancer treatment, use of molecular tests has been a target of controversies, due to their high costs and inaccessibility in limited resource situations. Research in breast cancer is also proceeding at a rapid pace, but it is important to remember that breast cancer continues to be a complex interplay of alterations at molecular and genetic level, with the variability in expressions at protein level leading to difference in behavior and responses to treatment and overall outcome. In the succeeding paragraphs, we will try to review the available evidence in literature and attempt to understand the molecular complexity of breast cancer in order to simplify the art of treating the disease and improving outcomes.The current COVID-19 pandemic has led to severe disruptions in health care delivery for cancer patients. These interruptions in cancer care delivery may have an unknown effect on cancer outcomes at the individual and population level. These yet to be known variations in individual and population-level cancer outcomes resulting from COVID-19 related interruptions in care can be labeled as COVID-19 Stage Migration (CSM).Hepatitis E is one of the leading causes of acute viral hepatitis worldwide. Chronic infection with hepatitis E is less common and limited to immunosuppressed patients and is usually due to genotype 3 of the virus. Genotype 1, the most prevalent strain in the South Asian region, is seldom known to be associated with chronic hepatitis. Here we describe a case of chronic hepatitis E with genotype 1 in a post-liver transplant setting. In the index case, previously compensated cryptogenic cirrhosis was decompensated by an acute hepatitis E infection, which necessitated liver transplantation because of acute chronic liver failure. This later progressed to chronicity. This case may have significant implications in management, especially in the post-liver transplant setting.Hepatic encephalopathy due to portosystemic shunts is a well-defined entity in patients with cirrhosis. Rarely, liver transplant recipients develop hepatic encephalopathy owing to persistence or surgically created portosystemic shunts. We present a case of post-transplant recurrent hepatic encephalopathy due to a surgically created portocaval shunt. The patient was managed by a covered metal stent placement in the inferior vena cava, thus causing functional closure of the shunt.Liver transplantation (LT) is the only cure for patients with end-stage liver disease, which offers good long-term survival. The long-term issues after LT affecting survival are cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, de novo malignancies, recurrence of original disease and immunological causes. Alcoholic-related liver disease (ALD) is one of the most common indications for LT worldwide including India. PCI-34051 mouse LT for ALD is associated with several unique challenges as compared with other etiologies. Long-term survival after LT in patients with ALD is affected by recidivism. Various studies have shown different predictors of relapse; the main predictors of relapse are pretransplant abstinence, psychiatric comorbidities, and lack of social support. Although several risk scores have been proposed, these scores are not validated. Studies with active involvement of psychiatrist have shown lower relapse rates. The relapse prevention strategy for reducing likelihood and severity of relapse after initial cessation of alcohol uses a combination of pharmacotherapy and cognitive behavioral approach (identifying and addressing high-risk situations for relapse).Renal dysfunction is very common among patients with chronic liver disease, and concomitant liver disease can occur among patients with chronic kidney disease. The spectrum of clinical presentation and underlying etiology is wide when concomitant kidney and liver disease occur in the same patient. Management of these patients with dual onslaught is challenging and requires a team approach of hepatologists and nephrologists. No recent guidelines exist on algorithmic approach toward diagnosis and management of these challenging patients. The Indian National Association for Study of Liver (INASL) in association with Indian Society of Nephrology (ISN) endeavored to develop joint guidelines on diagnosis and management of patients who have simultaneous liver and kidney disease. For generating these guidelines, an INASL-ISN Taskforce was constituted, which had members from both the societies. The taskforce first identified contentious issues on various aspects of simultaneous liver and kidney diseases, which were allotted to individual members of the taskforce who reviewed them in detail. A round-table meeting of the Taskforce was held on 20-21 October 2018 at New Delhi to discuss, debate, and finalize the consensus statements. The evidence and recommendations in these guidelines have been graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system with minor modifications. The strength of recommendations (strong and weak) thus reflects the quality (grade) of underlying evidence (I, II, III). We present here the INASL-ISN Joint Position Statements on Management of Patients with Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Disease.

There is limited information on comparison of clinical outcomes with carvedilol for secondary prophylaxis following acute variceal bleed (AVB) when compared with propranolol. We report long-term clinical and safety outcomes of a randomised controlled trial comparing carvedilol with propranolol with respect to reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in patients after AVB.

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of patients recruited in an open-label randomized controlled trial comparing carvedilol and propranolol following AVB, and estimated long-term rates of rebleed, survival, additional decompensation events and safety outcomes. Rebleed and other decompensations were compared using competing risks analysis, taking death as competing event, and survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Forty-eight patients (25 taking carvedilol; 23 propranolol) were followed up for 6 years from randomization. More number of patients on carvedilol had HVPG response when compared with those taking proprano cirrhosis after index variceal bleed with the exception of ascites that developed less frequently in patients with carvedilol.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) remains a major complication of cirrhosis. However, the incidence and the real impact of SBP in determining patient survival rates remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for SBP development and the role of SBP in predicting transplant-free survival.

Two hundred two consecutive patients underwent 492 paracenteses with biochemical and microbiological analysis of the ascitic fluid. When multiple paracenteses had been performed on a given patient, the first SBP-positive paracentesis or the first paracentesis conducted when none was diagnostic for SBP was included in the study.

SBP was detected in 28 of 202 (13.9%) patients; in 26 of 28 patients, the neutrophil count in the ascitic fluid was ≥250 cells/μl, and in 15 of 28 patients, the cultures were positive. Variables independently associated with SBP were as follows a higher model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, the serum glucose value, elevated CRP serum levels, and higher potassium serum levels. Overall, the median (range) transplant-free survival was 289 (54-1253) days. One hundred (49.5%) patients died, whereas 35 patients (17.3%) underwent liver transplantation. Independent predictors of death or liver transplantation were a higher MELD score and the development of SBP, especially if it was antibiotic-resistant or recurrent SBP.

The occurrence of SBP is associated with more severe liver dysfunction in conjunction with the presence of inflammation. Unlike the occurrence of SBP

, failure of first-line antibiotic treatment and SBP recurrence appear to strongly influence the mortality rate.

The occurrence of SBP is associated with more severe liver dysfunction in conjunction with the presence of inflammation. Unlike the occurrence of SBP per se, failure of first-line antibiotic treatment and SBP recurrence appear to strongly influence the mortality rate.

Resection is rarely indicated in giant hepatic hemangiomas (HHs) that are symptomatic. Enucleation (EN), compared with anatomical resection (AR), is considered the better technique to resect them as EN has been reported to have lower morbidity while conserving the normal liver tissue. But no study has yet clearly established the superiority of EN over AR. In addition, the independent predictors of postoperative morbidity have not been established.

All consecutive patients operated for HH at two specialized hepatobiliary centers were reviewed. Patient demographics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed and compared between two techniques. Postoperative complications were graded as per Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. The aims of this study were to compare two techniques of HH resection with respect to postoperative outcomes and to identify the risk factors for 90-day major postoperative morbidity and mortality.

A total of 64 patients, including 41 who underwent AR, 22who underwent EN, and 1 who underwent liver transplantation, were operated for hemangiomas during the study period.