Hawleyle9520
It is not uncommon for patients to complain about incompatibility with the glasses made, although an eyeglass determination has been performed with utmost precision. The causes for this can vary. Thus, the specification of the corneal vertex distance (HSA) is mandatory when prescribing spectacles in order to ensure the exact conversion of the measured values into the values in use. In addition, eye movements behind the lenses may result in a deviation from refractive accuracy and/or astigmatic deviation. Perceived colour fringes by the spectacle wearer are largely due to the choice of lens material. In preparation for a spectacle prescription, the correct choice of near addition can make reading at near physiologically tolerable. For this reason, the patient's individual remaining maximum amplitude of accommodation should always be determined. Especially when prescribing progressive-power lenses, it should be checked whether there is anisomotropy in the vertical direction. Asthenopic discomfort during near vision through the spectacle lenses can thus be avoided.Secondary angle closure glaucoma is a very heterogeneous subtype of glaucoma with a variety of possible causes leading to a blockade of the regular aqueous humour flow or outflow. A distinction is made between secondary pupillary block, angle closure with "pulling" or angle closure with "pushing" mechanisms. For each of these three subgroups, there are different causes, which in turn require individual therapy. Treatment of the underlying cause should always take priority whenever possible. Reduction of the intraocular pressure is often a symptomatic therapy with surgical, pressure lowering procedures showing a limited success rate in many forms of secondary angle closure glaucoma. This article intends to provide an overview of the different causes of secondary angle closure, diagnostic approaches and targeted therapies of exemplary causes of each subgroup.From the group of secondary pupillary block, mechanical causes, iris bombé, and intraoperative air or oil input are addressed, from the group of "pulling" causes, angle neovascularization, post-inflammatory angle changes, and iridocorneal endothelial syndrome and for the group of "pushing" mechanisms, gas endotamponade, retroiridal neoplasms and aqueous misdirection syndrome.While secondary angle closure is one of the most challenging glaucoma subgroups for treatment it is crucial to know the different subgroups and their development to choose the right treatment.Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a chronic retinal disease, which requires intensive clinical monitoring. Within the last ten years the intravitreal anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapy has become the standard of care to improve and stabilize vision in patients with centre involving DME. Long-acting intravitreal corticosteroids can achieve similar visual results with fewer injection rates. Because of steroid-induced side effects (progression of cataract, glaucoma) these drugs are regarded as second-line medication. Since the introduction of anti-VEGF-medication the focal laser photocoagulation is no longer considered as first-line therapy for DME. However, a focal laser treatment can sometimes be a possible alternative in specific situations. In patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and DME, the intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy is approved for both conditions. In ischemic maculopathy the functional outcome is restricted. For the indication of anti-VEGF-treatment for DME with accompanying central ischemia not only visual acuity and optical coherence tomography parameters should be considered, the amount of ischemia seen on fluorescein angiography should also be taken into account. In tractional macular edema due to epiretinal membranes and vitreomacular adhesions a pars-plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling is indicated.Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a vision-threatening microvascular complication of diabetes and the leading cause of blindness in working-age people. At the beginning of the metabolic disorder and in early stages of DR the patient's eyesight is often not affected. Depending on the duration of diabetes and in more advanced stages of DR the vision is compromised through the presence of diabetic macular edema (DME) and/or proliferative retinal complications. The management of DR comprises regular ophthalmic examinations according to clinical guidelines, the targeted application of multimodal imaging, and the specific treatment of DME and proliferative DR including secondary disorders such as neovascular glaucoma or persistent vitreous haemorrhage. Innovative ocular imaging techniques like optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography (OCT-A) and ultrawide field imaging play an important role in the assessment of diabetic patients. Various non-invasive imaging modalities have become part of the routine clinical work-up and help to identify new biomarkers for early diagnosis and long-term prognosis. In early stages of DR, the multifactorial intervention including glucose level and blood pressure control as well as optimizing the patient's cardiovascular risk profile is essential. A specific ophthalmic therapy is available for DME and proliferative DR (PDR). In patients with PDR the treatment regime includes panretinal laser photocoagulation or alternatively intravitreal anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor)-injections accompanied by close-meshed clinical monitoring. In patients with both, DME and PDR, it is suggested to start with Anti-VEGF drugs. In severe PDR with persistent vitreous haemorrhage, tractional maculopathy or tractional retinal detachment vitreoretinal surgery is recommended.
Our goal was to assess visual and quantitative aspects of multimodal skeletal SPECT/CT reconstructions (recon) in differentiating necrotic and healthy bone of patients with suspected MRONJ.
Prior to surgery, 20 patients with suspected MRONJ underwent SPECT/CT of the jaw 3-4 hours after injection of Tc-99m-DPD (622±112.4 MBq). SPECT/CT data were reconstructed using the multimodal xSPECT Bone and xSPECT Quant algorithms as well as the OSEM-algorithm FLASH 3D. For analysis, we divided the jaw into 12 separate regions. Both xSPECT Bone and FLASH 3D datasets were scored on a four-point scale (VIS xSPECT; VIS F3D), based on the intensity of localized tracer uptake. In F3D and xSPECT Quant datasets, local tracer uptake of each region was recorded as semi-quantitative uptake ratio (SQR F3D) or SUVs, respectively. ROC analysis was performed. Postoperative histologic results served as gold standard.
VIS F3D, VIS xSPECT and SQR F3D did not differ significantly in diagnostic accuracy (VIS xSPECT sensitivity=0.64; specificity=0.89). Of the quantitative parameters, SUVpeak yielded the best interobserver reproducibility. SUVpeak was 9.9±7.1 (95%CI 7.84-11.95) in MRONJ regions, as opposed 3.6±1.8 (95% CI3.36-3.88) elsewhere, with a cutpoint of 4.5 (sensitivity=0.83; specificity=0.80). Absolute quantitation significantly surpassed VIS and SQR (p<0.05) in accuracy and interobserver agreement (SUVpeak κ=0.92; VIS xSPECT κ=0.61; SQR F3D κ=0.66).
Absolute quantitation proved significantly more accurate than visual and semi-quantitative assessment in diagnosing MRONJ, with higher interobserver agreement.
Absolute quantitation proved significantly more accurate than visual and semi-quantitative assessment in diagnosing MRONJ, with higher interobserver agreement.Parkinson's disease patients frequently present cardiovascular dysfunction. Exercise with a self-selected intensity has emerged as a new strategy for exercise prescription aiming to increase exercise adherence. Thus, the current study evaluated the acute cardiovascular responses after a session of aerobic exercise at a traditional intensity and at a self-selected intensity in Parkinson's disease patients. Twenty patients (≥ 50 years old, Hoehn & Yahr 1-3 stages) performed 3 experimental sessions in random order Traditional session (cycle ergometer, 25 min, 50 rpm, 60-80% maximum heart rate); Self-selected intensity (cycle ergometer, 25 min, 50 rpm with self-selected intensity); and Control session (resting for 25 min). Before and after 30 min of intervention, brachial and central blood pressure (auscultatory method and pulse wave analysis, respectively), cardiac autonomic modulation (heart rate variability), and arterial stiffness (pulse wave analysis) were evaluated. Brachial and central systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and the augmentation index increased after the control session, whereas no changes were observed after the exercise sessions (P less then 0.01). Pulse wave velocity and cardiac autonomic modulation parameters did not change after the three interventions. In conclusion, a single session of traditional intensity or self-selected intensity exercises similarly blunted the increase in brachial and central blood pressure and the augmentation index compared to a non-exercise control session in Parkinson's disease patients.The effect of an upper body resistance training program on maximal and submaximal handcycling performance in able-bodied males was explored. Eighteen able-bodied men were randomly assigned to a training group (TG n=10) and a control group (CG n=8). TG received 7 weeks of upper body resistance training (60% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM), 3×10 repetitions, 6 exercise stations, 2 times per week). CG received no training. Peak values for oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak), power output (POpeak), heart rate (HRpeak), minute ventilation (V˙OEpeak) and respiratory exchange ratio (RERpeak), submaximal values (HR, V˙O2, RER, PO, and gross mechanical efficiency (GE)), and time to exhaustion (TTE) were determined in an incremental test pre- and post-training. Maximal isokinetic arm strength and 1RM tests were conducted. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were assessed. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons were performed to examine the effect of time, group and its interaction (p less then 0.05). TG improved on POpeak (8.55%), TTE (10.73%), and 1RM (12.28-38.98%). RPE at the same stage during pre- and post-test was lower during the post-test (8.17%). Despite no improvements in V˙O2peak, training improved POpeak, muscular strength, and TTE. Upper body resistance training has the potential to improve handcycling performance.Differences in blood flow patterns and energy cost between isometric and dynamic resistance exercise may result to variant cardiovascular, neural, and muscle metabolic responses. We aimed to compare the cardiovascular, baroreceptor sensitivity, and muscle oxygenation responses between workload-matched, large muscle-mass isometric and dynamic resistance exercises. Twenty-four young men performed an isometric and a dynamic double leg-press protocol (4 sets×2 min) with similar tension time index (workload). Harmine ADC Cytotoxin chemical Beat-by-beat hemodynamics, baroreceptor sensitivity, muscle oxygenation, and blood lactate were assessed. The increase in blood pressure was greater (p less then 0.05) in the 1st set during dynamic than isometric exercise (by ~4.5 mmHg), not different in the 2nd and 3rd sets, and greater in the 4th set during isometric exercise (by ~5 mmHg). Dynamic resistance exercise evoked a greater increase in heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, and contractility index (p less then 0.05), and a greater decline in peripheral resistance, baroreceptor sensitivity, and cardiac function indices than isometric exercise (p less then 0.