Hartmannwalls8244

The present study aimed to assess the associations between dosing of DOACs and outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) require dose adjustment according to patient or clinical factors for patients with NVAF. We conducted a single-center prospective registry of NVAF patients with DOACs DIRECT registry (UMIN000033283). In the present analysis, we categorized the patients (n = 2,216) into 5 groups appropriate standard-dose (n = 907, 40.9%), appropriate low-dose (n = 833, 37.6%), overdose (n = 117, 5.3%), underdose (n = 338, 15.3%), and contraindication (n = 21, 0.9%). The efficacy endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke/systemic embolism) and its individual components. The safety end points were adverse bleeding events including clinically significant bleeding, major bleeding, and gastro-intestinal bleeding. All NVAF patients treated with DOACs in our institution from 2011 to 2017 were enrolled (71.6 ± 10.8 years, 36.4% female, follow-up duration 407.2 ± 388.3 days). Appropriate low-dose group were older, more likely female, had a higher CHADS2 and ORBIT scores than the other groups. MACE (7.4%) and clinically significant bleeding (26.2%) occurred most frequently in the appropriate low-dose group. selleck compound However, after adjustment for various confounders, appropriate dose reduction of DOAC showed 35.4% risk reduction of clinically significant bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio 0.646, 95% CI [0.469 to 0.890], p = 0.007) with no impairment of efficacy end points. In the real-world Asian clinical practice, four fifths of the NVAF patients received appropriate dose of DOACs. Appropriate dose reduction was associated with decrease in clinically significant bleeding and no significant impairment in efficacy end points.The association of invasive versus noninvasive treatment and physical activity level in patients with claudication remains unclear. Participants with claudication were enrolled from US vascular clinics. Treatment was categorized as invasive (surgical or endovascular treatment less then 3 months of initial visit) versus noninvasive. Self-reported leisure time (LTPA) and work related physical activity (WRPA) (sedentary, mild, moderate/strenuous), and health status (peripheral artery questionnaire summary score [PAQ SS]) was measured at baseline and 12 months. Change in PA was also categorized as increased, decreased, persistent sedentary [reference] and persistent active based on activity status at baseline and 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association of treatment with 12-month LTPA and WRPA. Multivariable linear regression examined the association between 12-month change in PA with a 12-month change in PAQ. A total of 196of 656 patients (29.9%) underwent invasive treatment. There was no association between treatment and 12-month LTPA (p = 0.77) or WRPA (p = 0.26). Compared with being persistently sedentary, increased LTPA was associated with increased PAQ SS (OR 11.1 95% CI [4.4 to 17.7], p less then 0.01). In conclusion, there was no association between invasive treatment and physical activity at follow up despite a greater health status change in the invasive group. As increased physical activity was associated with more health status gains than remaining sedentary, additional ways to improve physical activity levels could potentially improve PAD outcomes.The glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide, administered as bolus followed by infusion, is an adjunctive antithrombotic treatment during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in selected patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Whether both bolus and infusion are necessary to improve outcomes is unknown. We hypothesized that primary PCI with eptifibatide bolus only is non-inferior to the conventional treatment (bolus and infusion) with regard to infarct size, while reducing bleeding complications. We analyzed 720 consecutive STEMI patients receiving eptifibatide bolus only or conventional treatment in an observational case-control study utilizing propensity score matching of clinical and intervention-specific confounders. Infarct size was estimated based on myocardial bound creatine kinase, creatine kinase (CK), and CK area under the curve values, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 20%. Major bleeding was defined as type 2, 3, or 5 on the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification. Eptifibatide bolus only was administered to 147 patients (20%), which were matched 11 to patients receiving conventional treatment. Based on peak myocardial bound creatine kinase, CK and CK area under the curve values, infarct size was -8.4% (95% CI [-31.2%, 14.4%]), -11.6% (95% CI [-33.5%, 10.3%]), and -13.9% (95% CI [-34.1%, 6.2%]) after eptifibatide bolus, respectively, reaching prespecified noninferiority compared with conventional treatment. Bolus treatment significantly reduced major bleeding complications (OR 0.48, 95% CI [0.30, 0.79]). In conclusion, eptifibatide given as abbreviated bolus only to selected STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI was noninferior regarding infarct size and resulted in less bleeding complications compared with conventional bolus and infusion treatment.Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) represents a rare complication after cardiac surgery, with no uniform agreement on timing and no information on follow-up. A multicenter retrospective study was designed to assess pacemaker dependency (PMD) and long-term mortality after cardiac surgery procedures. Between 2004 and 2016, PPI-patients from 18 centers were followed. Time-to-event data were evaluated with semiparametric regression Cox models and semiparametric Fine and Gray model for competing risk framework. Of 859 (0.90%) PPI-patients, 30% were pacemaker independent (PMI) at 6 months. PMD showed higher mortality compared with PMI (10-year survival 80.1% ± 2.6% and 92.2% +2.4%, respectively, log-rank p-value less then 0.001) with an unadjusted hazard ratio for death of 0.36 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.65, p less then 0.001 favoring PMI) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.19 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.45, p less then 0.001 with PMD as reference). Crude cumulative incidence function of restored PMI rhythm at follow-up at 6 months, 1 year and 12 years were 30.