Greenwoodhammer7115

Although commonly recorded as onset responses, the auditory brainstem response (ABR) can also be elicited at stimulus offset. check details The offset ABR has not been extensively investigated in marine mammals. Three normal hearing (NH) and three hearing impaired (HI) dolphins were assessed while fully submerged in sea water. Stimulus spectrum, level, rise/fall time (RFT), and plateau duration were manipulated. Onset and offset ABR amplitude were quantified as the rms voltage 1-7 ms following stimulus onset or offset, respectively. For the same stimulus conditions, onset and offset responses were often larger for NH than HI dolphins, and offset responses were typically smaller than onset responses. For the level series, offset response amplitude typically increased with increasing stimulus level, although offset responses were not 3 dB above the noisefloor for 113-kHz tonebursts. Increasing RFT decreased onset and offset response amplitude. For the 40-kHz tonebursts, a RFT of 32 μs produced a large amplitude offset ABR in NH dolphins. Offset responses for 113-kHz tonebursts were 3 dB above the noisefloor at the shortest RFTs. Offset responses were largest for 4 ms duration stimuli (likely due to overlapping onset and offset response analysis windows), but otherwise, offset responses changed little with increasing duration.The effect of presentation level and age on release from masking (RFM) was examined. Two speech-in-noise paradigms [i.e., fixed speech with varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and fixed noise with varying speech levels] were employed with competing continuous and interrupted noises. Young and older normal-hearing adults participated (N = 36). Word recognition was assessed at three presentation levels (i.e., 20, 30, and 40 dB sensation level) in SNRs of -10, 0, and 10 dB. Reception thresholds for sentences (RTSs) were determined at three presentation levels (i.e., 55, 65, and 75 dB sound pressure level). RTS SNRs were determined in both noises. RFM was computed by subtracting word recognition scores in continuous noise from interrupted noise and RTS SNRs in interrupted noise from continuous noise. Significant effects of presentation level, group, and SNR were seen with word recognition performance. RFM increased with increasing sensation level, was greater in younger adults, and was superior at -10 dB SNR. With RTS SNRs, significant effects of presentation level and group were found. The findings support the notion that RFM is a level dependent auditory temporal resolution phenomenon and older listeners display a deficit relative to younger listeners.Descriptions of the six different spinner dolphin (Stenella longirostris) whistle types were developed from a random sample of 600 whistles collected across a 2-yr period from a Fijian spinner dolphin population. An exploratory multivariate visualization suggested an inverse relationship between delta and minimum frequency (58.6%) as well as whistle duration (18.1%) as the most discriminating variables in this dataset. All three of these variables were deemed to be significant when considered jointly in a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) delta frequency (F5594 = 27.167, p  less then  0.0001), minimum frequency (F5594 = 14.889, p  less then  0.0001), and duration (F5594 = 24.303, p  less then  0.0001). Significant differences between at least two of the whistle types were found for all five acoustic parameters in univariate analysis of variation (ANOVA) tests. Constant and sine whistles were found to be the most distinctive whistles, whereas upsweep and downsweep whistles were the most similar. The identification of which parameters differ most markedly between whistle types and the relatively high explanatory power of this study's results provide a logical starting point for objective classification of spinner dolphin whistle types using machine learning techniques.The present study investigated whether the perception of virtual auditory distance is binaural, monaural, or both. Listeners evaluated the distance of a frontal source of pink noise simulated in a room via headphones. Experiment 1 was performed with eyes closed in a soundproof booth. Experiment 2 was performed with eyes open in the room used to create the stimuli. Individualized and non-individualized stimuli were compared. Different conditions for controlling sound level were tested. The amount of binaural information in the stimuli was varied by mixing the left and right ear signals in different proportions. Results showed that the use of non-individualized stimuli did not impair distance perception. Binaural information was not used by naive listeners to evaluate distance, both with and without visual information available. However, for some listeners, a complete absence of binaural information could disrupt distance evaluation with headphones. Sound level was a dominant cue used by listeners to judge for distance, and some listeners could also reliably use reverberation-related changes in spectral content. In the absence of specific training, artificial manipulation of sound level greatly altered distance judgments.Directivity of speech and singing is determined primarily by the morphology of a person, i.e., head size, torso dimensions, posture, and vocal tract. Previous works have suggested from measurements that voice directivity in singing is controlled unintentionally by spectral emphasis in the range of 2-4 kHz. The attempt is made to try to identify to what extent voice directivity is affected by the mouth configuration and the torso. Therefore, simulations, together with measurements that investigate voice directivity in more detail, are presented. Simulations are presented for a piston in an infinite baffle, a radiating spherical cap, and an extended spherical cap model, taking into account transverse propagation modes. Measurements of a classical singer, an amateur singer, and a head and torso simulator are undertaken simultaneously in the horizontal and vertical planes. In order to assess differences of voice directivity common metrics, e.g., horizontal and vertical directivity indexes, are discussed and compared to improved alternatives.