Gleasonweiner5400

Z Iurium Wiki

Bone marrow failure syndrome (BMFS) type 3 is a rare genetic heterogeneous disorder, considered to be one of Inherited BMFSs related to ribosomopathies. It caused by a novel Homozygous variant in DNAJC21 gene, which affects cytoplasmic maturation of 60S ribosomal, leading to increase cell death, and inhibits cellular proliferation causing shwachman-diamond Syndrome-like syndrome. Only 15 cases of BMFS type 3 have been published in the literature. Therefore, the full phenotypic spectrum and the experience of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are limited. Herein, we report an uncomplicated HSCT from human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling for a BMFS-3 patient at 22 months of age, who suffered from chronic diarrhea, severe failure to thrive and cytopenia required transfusions. We used a reduced intensity conditioning regimen including fludarabine, low-dose cyclophosphamide, and antithymocyte globulin with cyclosporine for prevent graft versus host disease. This regimen was safe and sufficient to achieve rapid engraftment without significant toxicity. Although, Mixed chimerism between 80% and 90% was observed since day +30, she gained 2 kg during 12 months post-transplant and no need for transfusions has been reported any more. Thus, we recommend HSCT with fludarabine-based reduced intensity conditioning regimen in this syndrome as progressive cytopenia occurs and an human leukocyte antigen-matched family donor is available.

Being the first line of defense against COVID-19 infection, health care workers (HCWs) are at an increased risk of getting infected. Infection prevention and control (IPC) measures were deemed to be instrumental in protecting them and their patients against infection.

To assess HCWs' knowledge of IPC measures and their perceived effectiveness in protecting against COVID-19.

A national web-based survey was conducted in different health care sectors in Qatar.

A total of 1757 HCWs completed the survey. HCWs believed in applying stricter IPC precautions while dealing with confirmed COVID-19 cases than with suspected cases. Males and physicians were more likely to have high perceived effectiveness of IPC measures than females, nurses, and pharmacists. Higher proportions of HCWs believed in the effectiveness of hand hygiene than most types of personal protective equipment.

Further research is recommended to assess the impact of HCWs' knowledge and perceived effectiveness of IPC measures on their compliance.

Further research is recommended to assess the impact of HCWs' knowledge and perceived effectiveness of IPC measures on their compliance.

The Poisson distribution is used to find the probability of an event occurring over an interval of time, distance, area, or volume.

It is a helpful statistical tool, especially when evaluating rare events, and is underused in nursing practice.

A single-group study design is used to demonstrate use of the Poisson distribution in determining whether a change in the number of discrete events is due to random variation or reflects a change in practice patterns and in determining the probability of seeing the number of observed events.

Steps demonstrate how one can easily use the Poisson distribution to answer common questions.

Use of the Poisson distribution can help nurses make better informed decisions about observed variations in care, especially when the data are not normally distributed, and can prevent undue concern when fluctuations in the number of events are associated with random fluctuations.

Use of the Poisson distribution can help nurses make better informed decisions about observed variations in care, especially when the data are not normally distributed, and can prevent undue concern when fluctuations in the number of events are associated with random fluctuations.

To improve understanding of podcast use in medical education by examining current research on descriptive attributes and educational outcomes, highlighting implications of the current evidence base for educational practices, and identifying research gaps to guide future investigation.

The authors conducted a scoping review, searching PubMed and Embase databases in June-July 2020 for English-language studies of audio-only medical education podcast use in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education. The authors excluded studies without original data or with nonphysician data that could not be separated from physician data. From included studies, the authors extracted data regarding descriptive outcomes (e.g., podcast use, content areas, structure) and educational outcomes (classified using Kirkpatrick's 4 levels of evaluation).

Of 491 unique articles, 62 met inclusion criteria. Descriptive outcomes were reported in 44 studies. Analysis of these studies revealed podcast use has increased overprove to be essential tools for disseminating and implementing the most current, evidence-based practices.

Future research should focus on the optimal structure of podcasts for learning, higher-level outcomes of podcasts, and the implementation of podcasts into formal curricula. Podcasts may prove to be essential tools for disseminating and implementing the most current, evidence-based practices.The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) in 2007 developed the Holistic Review Framework for medical school admissions to increase mission-aligned student diversity. This approach balances an applicant's experiences, attributes, and metrics during the screening, interview, and selection processes. Faculty recruitment provides its own set of challenges, and there is persistent underrepresentation of certain racial and ethnic minority groups and women in faculty and leadership positions in U.S. academic health centers (AHCs). In 2019, the AAMC initiated a pilot program to adapt and implement the framework for use in faculty recruitment at AHCs. In this commentary, the authors describe the pilot implementation of the Holistic Review Framework for Faculty Recruitment and Retention and share lessons learned to date Although the pilot proceeded during 2020, institutional implementation was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and racial justice movement. Pilot institutions encountered hiring freezes, reductions in funding, and restrictions on in-person meetings due to COVID-19 that resulted in both barriers and opportunities in implementing the framework. learn more Renewed commitment to racial justice was associated with increased momentum and urgency for the implementation of faculty holistic review at the majority of pilot institutions. Common themes from the pilot leads' experiences included the importance of achieving "buy in," having a dedicated implementation team, and being explicit about core values. Other themes included the importance of adaptability and flexibility to meet the needs of different institutions and mission areas. The faculty holistic review framework has shown promise as an approach to advancing faculty diversity goals. The pilot institutions will continue to share best practices, track outcomes, implement quality improvement, and disseminate findings to assist other institutions and health care communities with their endeavors to recruit and retain diverse faculty.

Entrustment is central to assessment in competency-based medical education (CBME). To date, little research has addressed how clinical supervisors conceptualize entrustment, including factors they consider in making entrustment decisions. The aim of this study was to characterize supervisors' decision making related to procedural entrustment, using gastrointestinal endoscopy as a test case.

Utilizing methods from constructivist grounded theory, the authors interviewed 29 endoscopy supervisors in the United States and Canada across multiple specialities (adult and pediatric gastroenterology, surgery, and family medicine). Semistructured interviews, conducted between April and November 2019, focused on how supervisors conceptualize procedural entrustment, how they make entrustment decisions, and what factors they consider. Transcripts were analyzed using constant comparison to generate an explanatory framework and themes.

Three themes were identified from the analysis of interview transcripts (1) entrustminee unsupervised practice. Those leading CBME programs may wish to invest in optimizing the observed static factors, such that these foundational factors are tuned to facilitate trainee learning and achievement of entrustment.

In the process of making procedural entrustment decisions, clinical supervisors appear to synthesize multiple dynamic factors against a background of static factors, culminating in a decision of whether to entrust. Entrustment decisions appear to fluctuate over time, and assessors may transfer decisions about specific trainees across settings. Understanding which factors supervisors perceive as influencing their decision making has the potential to inform faculty development, as well as competency committees seeking to aggregate faculty judgments about trainee unsupervised practice. Those leading CBME programs may wish to invest in optimizing the observed static factors, such that these foundational factors are tuned to facilitate trainee learning and achievement of entrustment.

Chronic pain affects 100 million Americans and is most often treated in primary care, where the health care provider shortage remains a challenge. Nurse practitioners (NPs) represent a growing solution, yet their patterns of chronic pain management are understudied. Additionally, prescriptive authority limitations in many states limit NPs from prescribing opioids and often exist due to concerns of NP-driven opioid overprescribing. Little evidence on NP pain management prescribing patterns exists to address these issues.

Systematic review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, to examine opioid and nonopioid prescribing patterns of physicians, NPs, and physician assistants (PAs) in primary care. Eligible studies scored ≥60% on the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal checklist.

Searches within PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science.

Three themes were elucidated 1) opioid prescribing in primary care, 2) similarities and differences in oesearch should examine prescribing patterns of nonopioid, including nonpharmacologic, therapies.

To determine the effect of inhalation aromatherapy on sedation level, analgesic dosage, and bispectral index (BIS) values during donor site dressing in patients with burns.

This trial was conducted on 62 patients with burns requiring donor site dressing who were admitted to the Burn Center of Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. In the intervention group, the patients inhaled damask rose 40% and lavender 10% essential oils during donor site dressing change, whereas in the control group, the site was dressed using routine protocol. Sedatives and analgesics were prescribed until the levels of brain activity achieved light sedation. The brain activity and sedation levels were measured before and after the donor site dressings using the BIS. Data were analyzed using the analysis of covariance and the two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures.

All 62 patients completed the study. The required doses of ketamine (P < .001), fentanyl (P = .003), morphine (P < .001), and propofol (P < .001) were significantly lower in the intervention group.

Autoři článku: Gleasonweiner5400 (Irwin Gylling)