Frantzensauer7934

re. Pre- and post-operative ocular motility range was measured with a Hess screen test, and the percentage of Hess area ratio (HAR%) was used for all statistical comparisons. The distance between the fractured bone and orbital floor (DBFO) on computed tomography was measured before and four months after surgery. Overall, diplopia, and pain improved after surgery in all patients. Diplopia and pain completely disappeared in 17 patients, while only mild diplopia remained in one. HAR% increased significantly, whereas DBFO reduced significantly after the operation. In conclusion, the outcome of the mucosal preservation procedure was favorable without any major complications. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to verify our technique.

Deformity and tissue loss involving the craniomaxillofacial region occurs frequently as a result of trauma, oncologic resection, or a congenital malformation. In order to maximize the patient's quality of life, reconstruction of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton must seek to restore aesthetics as well as function. Advances in diagnostic technology, surgical technique, instrumentation, and innovative biomaterials used have transformed the way reconstructive surgeons approach their patients' needs. From the advent of alloplastic reconstruction, surgeons have sought the ideal material for use in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Substances such as metals, ceramics, glasses, and more recently resorbable polymers and bioactive materials have all been utilized.While autologous bone has remained widely-favored and the gold standard, synthetic alternatives remain a necessity when autologous reconstruction is not readily available. Today, alloplastic material, autografting via microvascular tissue transfer, hormone and grurgery. Substances such as metals, ceramics, glasses, and more recently resorbable polymers and bioactive materials have all been utilized.While autologous bone has remained widely-favored and the gold standard, synthetic alternatives remain a necessity when autologous reconstruction is not readily available. Today, alloplastic material, autografting via microvascular tissue transfer, hormone and growth factor-induced bone formation, and computer-aided design and manufacturing of biocompatible implants represent only a fraction of a wide range of options used in the reconstruction of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. We present a brief review of the materials used in the repair of deformities of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton as well as a look into the potential future direction of the field.

Complication rate related with cranioplasty is described as very high in most of relevant studies. The aim of our study was to try to identify possible factors, that could predict complications following cranioplasty. The authors hypothesized that some physical characteristics on the preoperative brain computed tomography (CT) scan can be predictive for complications.The authors carried out a prospective observational study. All patients were adults after decompressive craniectomy, planned for cranioplasty and had a brain CT scan the day before cranioplasty. Our data pool included demographics, reason of craniectomy, various radiological parameters, the time of cranioplasty after craniectomy, the type of cranioplasty bone flap, and the complications.Twenty-five patients were included in the study. The authors identified statistically significant correlation between time of cranioplasty after craniectomy and the complications, as well as between the type of cranioplasty implant and the complications. There wrter time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty lowers the risk for complications. The risk seems to be decreased further, by using autologous bone flap. Low values of the FBSD increase the risk for complications. This risk factor can be avoided, by shortening the time between craniectomy and cranioplasty.

In unilateral cleft lip and palate patients, the alar base is displaced inferoposterolaterally due to the depression of the pyriform aperture in the cleft side, and the drooping of the nostril rim is provoked by displacement of the alar base. This study was conducted between May 1998 and December 2012. In total, 82 patients with secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal deformities were treated using alar base augmentation. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/mk-0159.html The patients were divided into two groups according to the degree of their preoperative alar base asymmetry. Patients with alar base asymmetry <3 mm were treated with a soft tissue augmentation procedure. Those with alar base asymmetry >3 and <6 mm were treated with a bony augmentation procedure. Soft tissue augmentation was conducted in 42 patients, and bony augmentation was conducted in 40 patients. In the soft tissue augmentation group, the degree of alar base asymmetry was improved from 2.42 ± 0.38 mm preoperatively to 0.45 ± 0.21 mm postoperatively (P  < 0.05). In the bony au50 mm preoperatively to 0.81 ± 0.20 mm postoperatively (P  less then  0.05). In the amount of alar base augmentation, there were statistically significant differences between the soft tissue augmentation group and the bony augmentation group (P  less then  0.05). This clinical study shows that secondary cleft lip nasal deformities can be corrected with alar base augmentation using soft tissue and bony augmentation and that these procedures can provide reliable, satisfactory, and safe clinical outcomes.

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) repair is typically performed in a staged fashion, which requires multiple instances of anesthetic exposure during a critical period of infant neurodevelopment. One solution to this concern includes the implementation of a single-stage CLP repair performed between 6 and 12 months of age. This study aimed to compare total anesthetic exposure between single-stage and staged CLP repairs. A retrospective review of unilateral CLP repairs between 2013 and 2018 conducted at a single institution was performed. Patients underwent either traditional, staged lip and palate repair, or single-stage complete cleft repair, where palate, lip, alveolus, and nasal repair was performed simultaneously. Primary endpoints included total surgical time and total anesthetic exposure. Secondary endpoints included excess anesthesia time, recovery room time, length of stay, and type of anesthetic administered. Two hundred twenty-five (n = 225) unilateral CLP repairs were conducted at the Loma Linda University.