Delacruzdemir5863

Compared to the therapeutic RW, a significantly higher proportion of the diagnostic RW identified fear of being infected as a major stressor (166/412 (40.3%)

30/110 (27.3%),

= 0.01).

This survey has demonstrated changes to clinical practice, in particular to working patterns, service delivery and infection prevention and control were key contributors to workplace-related stress during the pandemic.

Timely and adequate staff training and availability of PPE as well as psychosocial support during future pandemics would enhance quality patient and staff safety.

Timely and adequate staff training and availability of PPE as well as psychosocial support during future pandemics would enhance quality patient and staff safety.

We describe the inter-rater agreement between Emergency Department (ED) clinicians and reporting radiologists in the interpretation of chest X-rays (CXRs) in patients presenting to ED with suspected COVID-19.

We undertook a retrospective cohort study of patients with suspected COVID-19. We compared ED clinicians' and radiologists' interpretation of the CXRs according to British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) guidelines, using the area under the receiver operator curve (ROC area).

CXRs of 152 cases with suspected COVID-19 infection were included. Sensitivity and specificity for 'classic' COVID-19 CXR findings reported by ED clinician was 84 and 83%, respectively, with a ROC area of 0.84 (95%CI 0.77 to 0.90). Accuracy improved with ED clinicians' experience, with ROC areas of 0.73 (95%CI 0.45 to 1.00), 0.81 (95%CI 0.73 to 0.89), 1.00 (95%CI 1.00 to 1.00) and 0.90 (95%CI 0.70 to 1.00) for foundation year doctors, senior house officers, higher speciality trainees and ED consultants, respectively (

< 0.001).

ED clinicians demonstrated moderate inter-rater agreement with reporting radiologists according to the BSTI COVID-19 classifications. The improvement in accuracy with ED clinician experience suggests training of junior ED clinicians in the interpretation of COVID-19 related CXRs might be beneficial. Large-scale survey studies might be useful in the further evaluation of this topic.

This is the first study to examine inter-rater agreement between ED clinicians and radiologists in regards to COVID-19 CXR interpretation.Further service configurations such as 24-hr hot reporting of CXRs can be guided by these data, as well as an ongoing, nationwide follow-up study.

This is the first study to examine inter-rater agreement between ED clinicians and radiologists in regards to COVID-19 CXR interpretation.Further service configurations such as 24-hr hot reporting of CXRs can be guided by these data, as well as an ongoing, nationwide follow-up study.Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK and is the leading cause of death. Radiology plays a central role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected and known lung cancer. Tumour assessment includes both local staging, as well as distant staging. Local staging objectives include the assessment of technical resectability with regard to the evaluation of tumour size and invasion of surrounding structures. Distant staging objectives aim to identify distant metastasis in lymphatic and extra lymphatic tissues. CT, positron emission tomography/CT, MRI, and ultrasound are routinely used imaging techniques for staging in patients with lung cancer. In this review, we will consider the pitfalls of these examinations that radiologists potentially face during the work-up of patients with lung cancer.The rapid and mostly uncontrolled spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic over the past 4 months has overwhelmed many healthcare systems worldwide. In Singapore, while our public healthcare institutions were considered well prepared due to our prior experience with the SARS outbreak, there was an unexpected surge of infected patients over the recent 2 months to deal with. We describe our radiology department's experience in modifying operational practices and implementing strict infection control measures aimed at minimizing disease transmission and mitigating the potential impact of possible staff infection. From the perspective of serving a medium-sized regional hospital and limited by physical and manpower constraints, our radiology department had to adapt quickly and modify our initial responses and practices as the disease scenario changed. We have also enumerated some guidelines for planning future radiology departments.

To study the spectrum of chest CT features in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pneumonia and to identify the initial CT findings that may have the potential to predict a poor short-term outcome.

This was a retrospective study comprising 211 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positive patients who had undergone non-contrast chest CT. Prevalence, extent, pattern, distribution and type of abnormal lung findings were recorded. Patients with positive CT findings were divided into two groups; clinically stable (requiring in-ward hospitalization) and clinically unstable [requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission or demised] based on short-term follow-up.

Lung parenchymal abnormalities were present in 42.2% (89/211) whereas 57.8% (122/211) cases had a normal chest CT. The mean age of clinically unstable patients (63.6 ± 8.3 years) was significantly different from the clinically stable group (44.6 ± 13.2 years) (

-value < 0.05). Bilaterality, combined involvement of central-peripheID-19 pneumonia.

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of hypofractionated orbital radiotherapy applied in the treatment of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) patients.

Between 2014 and 2018, we retrospectively reviewed the cases of 28 patients with TAO. All patients underwent radiotherapy on both retroocular tissues and received an oral steroid. Patients were divided into two treatment groups 14 patients received conventional fractionated radiotherapy (20 Gy in 10 fractions), and the second group of 14 patients received hypofractionated radiotherapy (20 Gy in five fractions). 4EGI-1 cost The clinical activity score (CAS), NOSPECS (No physical signs or symptoms, Only signs, Soft tissue involvement, Proptosis, Extraocular muscle signs, Corneal involvement, and Sight loss) classification, Hess screen test and binocular single vision (BSV) were evaluated to determine the response to treatment before and at 1 month after radiotherapy.

There were no significant differences in any of the variables between the two treatment groups.