Collinswilson1582

Understand the deep relations between biology (logic of life, language of life), bioethics (ethos of life) and environment (fruit of the ecosystem-culture relationship, Angel Maya, A. 1996), from the South that we embody, implies decolonizing, deconstructing these three terms from the Southern Environmental Thought. It is about de-anthropizing them and reconfiguring them from geo-thought, that is, the thought that arises from our earth.To see ethics in a telluric way implies to feel it in the earth, as an understanding of the language of nature and of life. Of human life, certainly, but without excluding other forms of life. Rather, it is about denouncing the way in which life is exploited, put at the service of industrial production.Southern Environmental Thought connects bioethics with the environment to show the close aesthetic-complex relationship between these two words. GC376 The term Abya Yala reflects this reality. Originally from Cuna, this word means to live well and refers to the way of living of the non-Westernized human. It also means the generous, fertile and flowering Earth, words which evoke the way in which the Habitat allows the inhabitant to poetically inhabit the Earth.Thus are born new ethico-aesthetic epistems ways of knowing-understanding-recreating, de-westernized, configured from other logics, other ways of feeling, and which show the abyssal gulf between Western thought and Southern thought.In the Post-modern ages, the human being is doubly put into question  naturalisation of humanity (strong naturalism) is challenged by the hypothesis that man transcends the natural order; a self-based liberty is challenged by the ethics of responsibility, according which man is requested to be responsible for the Nature he is able to destroy. How can we deal with such a undetermined human nature and on the other hand, with a specific responsibility of mankind over Nature? This paper examines several theories of the environment reconsidered as a place of humanization that is to be shared. This allows an intercultural ethics of the world as vital for all, beyond any ethnocentric normativity. How can we justify that the world is not available to appropriation? Nevertheless, how can we have a use of the world combining humanization, socialization and personal development? How can we ‘co-operate’ the world through our vital links so that we become more human the ones by the others?Is there an environmental criminal law? Environmental law is emerging as a new, third-generation, collective, peripheral, predominantly public, fundamental, preventive rather than repressive, global, universal and inalienable right, a right of interrelation, the object of which is essentially natural, changing and interdisciplinary. In turn, environmental criminal law could be defined as “the set of legal norms with criminal content aimed at protecting the environment in which man lives and is in contact”.From the 1960s to the present, most States in the world have enacted legislation aimed at reducing the impacts of environmental degradation. However, the affirmation of the right of every person to a healthy and adequate environment for life as a Human Right constituted an important milestone for its incorporation in the constitutional frameworks and legal systems of countries; in the policies, norms and programs of international organizations; as well as in the regulation of economic activities, promoting the development of Environmental Law. In a complementary manner, the prosecution of cases of violation of the fundamental right to a healthy and adequate environment for life not only provides an important source of constitutional jurisprudence at the national and international level; it also contributes to broaden the theoretical and conceptual scope of this right, as well as to clarify its interdependence and articulation with other principles.In Peru, the right to a balanced and adequate environment is first incorporated in the 1979 Political Constitution, and later reformulated in the 1993 Constitution. The present text offers a brief overview of the development of the right to a healthy and adequate environment for life as a fundamental right in the legislation and jurisprudence of the Peruvian State.We address the ethical causes of the global ecological crisis we are currently undergoing, along with the expansion of the instrumental reason that is typical of modernity and the critics arisen from ecological ethics and feminism. Helping to solve the ethical crisis found in the base of ecology, with the intention of universal rationality, is possible from bioethical approach utilitarianism and radical neoliberalism are useless, and maybe the foundations of our ethical duties with the nature and the rest of the living creatures may be found in the proposals of the dialogic ethics, neoaristotelian perspective and personalisme.In Italy, the issue of the environment was addressed by the doctrine and jurisprudence, but only in recent years – as a result of a progressive deterioration of the planetary ecosystem – has formed a European law of the environment that has strongly influenced the Italian legislation. The paper aims to shed light on the principles of the Italian Constitution that protect the environment until the new legislation concerning environmental crime.

To evaluate the long-term results of implantation of homogeneous large size of pulmonary homograft (PH) for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT).

Between January 2000 and December 2017, 107 patients were implanted with PH for reconstruction of the RVOT. Data were collected retrospectively in this single-center study. PH failure was defined as a peak of gradient greater than 40 mmHg and/or as a pulmonary regurgitation greater than Grade 2. Primary endpoint was the reoperation of the RVOT during follow-up. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, occurrence of PH failure and the rate of reoperation for all cause.

Mean age of the recipients was 26.1 ± 13.6 years. Median follow-up interval was 2.99 years (interquartile range [IQR] 6.2). Mean size of PH was 24.9 ± 1.9 mm. Reoperation of the RVOT occurred in eight patients (7.8%). Time before reoperation was 2.74 years (IQR 6.4). Freedom from reoperation for RVOT at 5 and 10 years was respectively 95.7% and 90.0%. Overall survival at 10 years was 95.