Clapprasch1861

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a haematologic malignancy with significant improvements in the overall survival over the last decade. However, patients still relapse and die due to a lack of treatment options. Ultimately, novel therapies with the potential for long term remissions are needed for patients with advanced MM. Research efforts for such immune therapies were not successful until recently when the first immunotherapies for MM were approved in 2015 and many more are under development. In this review, we focus on adoptive cell therapies including CAR T-cell and CAR NK-cell therapies for patients with MM. We will provide an update on clinical and translational advances with a focus on results from ongoing clinical trials with BCMA targeted cellular therapies and the development of other novel targets, changes in the manufacturing process, trials focusing on earlier lines of therapy and combinations with other therapies as well as off the shelf products. Recent years saw significant breakthroughs in treatment of multiple myeloma. Durable remissions are now seen in a significant proportion of patients with the previously uniformly incurable and progressive disease. Yet because of deep suppression of the neoplastic myeloma clones by the newer therapies, older disease monitoring techniques are insufficient to distinguish between the patients at high risk of imminent relapse and those in whom durable remission is expected. This review briefly describes prognostic and therapeutic implications of measurable disease (MRD) evaluation, explains why deep MRD evaluation is needed for patients without morphologic evidence of disease, and reviews the state of the art of evaluation of myeloma MRD by flow cytometry. Advances in technologies for genomic profiling, primarily with next generation sequencing, have lead to a better understanding of the complex genomic landscape in multiple myeloma. Integrated analysis of whole genome, exome and transcriptome sequencing has lead to new insights on disease drivers including translocations, copy number alterations, somatic mutations, and altered gene expression. Disease progression in multiple myeloma is largely driven by structural variations including the traditional immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) translocations and hyperdiploidy which are early events in myelomagenesis as well as more complex events spanning over multiple chromosomes and involving amplifications and deletions. In this review, we will discuss recent insights on the genomic landscape of multiple myeloma and their implications for disease progression and personalized treatment. We will review how sequencing assays compare to current clinical methods and give an overview of modern technologies for interrogating genomic aberrations. Multiple myeloma, a bone marrow cancer, is preceded by precursor stages called monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance and smoldering multiple myeloma. Over the past few years, highly effective and safe therapies have been made available to treat multiple myeloma. This represents a major breakthrough and has major therapeutic implications. Treatment for multiple myeloma has evolved to include treatment of precursor stages (early treatment) as these therapies are shown to be safe and effective also in smoldering myeloma. Randomized studies have shown that early treatment can delay the onset of multiple myeloma and even improve overall survival compared to observation in smoldering myeloma. The best therapeutic course and selection of patients with smoldering myeloma to treat is still a matter of debate. In this manuscript, we review the definition, management, clinical implications of smoldering myeloma and early detection of myeloma in the current context and with up-to-date data. Over the course of the past decade-plus, the therapy of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has seen incredible advances in the domains of diagnostic evaluation, active medical therapy, and response evaluation. This manuscript reviews the evaluation and management of newly diagnosed active multiple myeloma, with a focus on major clinical trials and IMWG recommendations. The paper describes a current approach for the initial evaluation and workup for patients with putative active myeloma, with consideration towards potential MRD-directed therapeutic approaches and future clinical trials, and then discusses management with a focus on induction regimens with attention primarily to modern three and four-drug combinations for transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients, and those with organ dysfunction. Finally, this article briefly reviews minimal residual disease directed therapy approaches, primarily in the context of whether eligible patients should be referred for high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue. Maintenance therapy for both transplant eligible and ineligible patients is discussed elsewhere in this issue. State of the art treatment for myeloma involves using 3-drug combinations incorporating immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs). Clinical trials for 4-drug combinations incorporating monoclonal antibodies added to IMiD and PI based backbones are underway. Recent retrospective analyses show that patients who attain MRD negativity have similar long term outcomes regardless of early or delayed high dose melphalan with autologous stem cell support (HDM-ASCT). Given HDM-ASCT toxicity, not "overtreating" would be beneficial. Short of data from future prospective clinical trials addressing the question of the role of HDM-ASCT in MRD negative patients, varying expert opinions inherently arise. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gw3965.html In this paper, we present the historical context of HDM-ASCT and data supporting 3-drug combinations. We then propose that a viable option for patients who reach MRD negativity is to transition to maintenance therapy directly without early HDM-ASCT, and reserving stem cell harvest to cases where HDM-ASCT is a possibility at relapse. Published by Elsevier Ltd.Achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow is one of the strongest prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Consequently, MRD testing is routinely performed in clinical trials and moving towards standard of care. This review focuses on the role of next generation sequencing (NGS) of tumor-specific immunoglobulin V(D)J sequences for MRD tracking. The immunoglobulin variable regions are ideal targets for tracking, because every tumor cell shares an identical gene sequence, which is stable over time and generally distinct from the immunoglobulin sequences of normal B-cells. Several excellent assays for NGS-based MRD testing are available, both commercial and community-based, including one that is FDA-approved. These assays can achieve the gold standard analytical sensitivity of one tumor cell per million (10-6), requiring a minimum input of 3 million bone marrow cells. On-going clinical trials will outline how MRD testing should be used to inform dynamic risk-adopted therapy. Fluorine-18 (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) allows evaluation of elevated glucose metabolism in malignancies. There has been increasing interest in FDG PET/CT for plasma cell disorders since the International Myeloma Working Group outlined multiple applications of this imaging modality, including distinguishing smoldering myeloma from active multiple myeloma, confirmation of solitary plasmacytoma, and multiple indications in patients with known multiple myeloma, including determining extent of initial disease, monitoring therapy response, and detection of residual disease following therapy. The field of molecular imaging is now shifting focus from evaluation of metabolism to targeted evaluation of specific tumor markers. Targeted PET imaging targeted of CXCR4 and CD38 has advanced into translational clinical trials, bringing us closer to powerful imaging options for myeloma. In this review we discuss the current applications of FDG PET/CT in plasma cell disorders, as well as advances in targeted PET imaging. Over the past years, the emergence of liquid biopsy technologies has dramatically expanded our ability to assess multiple myeloma without the need for invasive sampling. Interrogation of cell-free DNA from the peripheral blood recapitulates the mutational landscape at excellent concordance with matching bone marrow aspirates. It can quantify disease burden and identify previously undetected resistance mechanisms which may inform clinical management in real-time. The convenience of sample acquisition and storage provides strong procedural benefits over currently available testing. Further investigations will have to define the role of cell-free DNA as a diagnostic measure by determining clinically relevant tumor thresholds in comparison to existing routine parameters. This review presents an overview of currently available assays and discusses the clinical value, potential and limitations of cell-free DNA technologies for the assessment of this challenging disease. Multiple myeloma is the second most common lymphoproliferative disorder, characterized by aberrant expansion of monoclonal plasma cells. In the last years, thanks to novel next generation sequencing technologies, multiple myeloma has emerged as one of the most complex hematological cancers, shaped over time by the activity of multiple mutational processes and by the acquisition of key driver events. In this review, we describe how whole genome sequencing is emerging as a key technology to decipher this complexity at every stage of myeloma development precursors, diagnosis and relapsed/refractory. Defining the time windows when driver events are acquired improves our understanding of cancer etiology and paves the way for early diagnosis and ultimately prevention. The changing landscape of treatment options for multiple myeloma has led to a higher proportion of patients achieving deep, long-lasting responses to therapy. With the associated improvement in overall survival, the development of subsequent second malignancies has become of increased significance. The risk of second malignancy after multiple myeloma is affected by a combination of patient-, disease- and therapy-related risk factors. This review discusses recent data refining our knowledge of these contributing factors, including current treatment modalities which increase risk (i.e. high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplant and lenalidomide maintenance therapy). We highlight emerging data towards individualized risk- and response-adapted treatment strategies and discuss key areas requiring future research. The recent development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has revolutionized the treatment armamentarium for multiple myeloma. The success of daratumumab and elotuzumab in relapsed/refractory patients, has generated tremendous enthusiasm for mAbs in this disease. Combination treatment with other anti-myeloma treatment modalities and clinical evaluation in newly diagnosed patients are expected to fundamentally change the natural history of the disease. Advances in biopharmaceutical engineering together with a robust interest in novel mAb-derivatives, including antibody drug conjugates and poly-specific antibodies are the next rapidly approaching treatment frontier in multiple myeloma. In this review, we comprehensively outline the currently available evidence and the future landscape of mAbs and mAb-derivative therapies in multiple myeloma.