Cheekbriggs7739

Surgical airway management should be regarded as one of many tools available to forward clinical Operators. The need for that intervention should be determined in a quick and decisive manner consistent with accepted protocols for combat care. The case presented discusses immediate surgical access to the airway required after the initial assessment of the patient and illustrates the clinical urgency of patients requiring surgical intervention in the field setting. 2020.PURPOSE To evaluate the Bernell Evaluation of Stereopsis Test (BEST) (Bernell Corporation, Mishawaka, IN), a new lenticular technology and filter-free test to measure stereopsis in children, and compare it to the Randot Stereotest (Randot) (Stereo Optical, Inc., Chicago, IL). METHODS This was a retrospective review of the medical records of children examined at the Center for Pediatric Ophthalmology at Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center from July to November 2018. All children were evaluated with the Randot and BEST in a random order. RESULTS The study included 100 children (53% female, 64% orthophoric) with a mean age of 8.52 ± 3.18 years (range 3.3 to 17.8 years) and mean best corrected visual acuity of 0.178 ± 0.16 logMAR (range 0 to 0.7 logMAR). The mean BEST stereoacuity was 1.772 ± 0.27 log seconds of arc (arcsec), whereas the mean Randot stereo-acuity was 1.778 ± 0.39 log arcsec (P = .835). The Bland- Altman analysis revealed an overall bias of 0.0073 log arcsec (95% confidence interval 0.04219 to 0.05679 log arcsec), with limits of agreement of -0.4816 to 0.4962 log arcsec (0.3299 to 3.1347 arcsec). A significant proportional bias was noted because the difference between the tests was significantly larger in higher log arcsec values (t = 5.566, P .05). Both tests were influenced by strabismus but not monocular amblyopia. CONCLUSIONS BEST stereoacuity measurements were comparable to those of the Randot, with no significant difference in crude values, minimal bias, and narrow limits of agreement. A larger, clinically insignificant variability between tests was noted with lower stereoacuity values, because children achieved better scores with the BEST. The BEST may be a valuable tool in the arsenal of the ophthalmologist. PF-06952229 datasheet [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020;57(2)129-135.]. Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.PURPOSE To evaluate functional vision in patients with CHARGE syndrome (coloboma, heart defects, atresia of the choanae, retardation of growth and development, genital and urinary anomalies, and ear anomalies) by using a new questionnaire entitled VISIOCHARGE. METHODS Ophthalmological data including fundus description and visual acuity, when available, were extracted from the charts of 83 patients with CHARGE syndrome, and the VISIOCHARGE questionnaire was prospectively mailed to 55 of those patients. The answers from the 36 responders (18 males) allowed for the calculation of three scores that assessed distance vision, near vision, and overall ability scores. RESULTS Visual acuity measurements were extracted from the charts of 20 of the 36 patients. The mean visual acuity was 20/50. The mean distance vision score of 0.62 ± 0.30 and near vision score of 0.78 ± 0.23 were correlated with visual acuity in the 20 patients (ρ = 0.64, P = .002 and ρ = 0.61, P = .005, respectively) and were associated with the severity of colobomatous malformation (P = .049 and P = .008, respectively). Severity of the ocular malformation was not associated with the overall ability score (P = .64). CONCLUSIONS The VISIOCHARGE questionnaire is feasible for patients with CHARGE syndrome and may help in the assessment of visual function. The mean visual acuity and answers to the VISIOCHARGE questionnaire showed relatively good visual skills in patients with CHARGE syndrome in everyday life, even in those with bilateral colobomas, which contrasts with the pessimistic conclusions usually resulting from the initial fundus examination. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020;57(2)120-128.]. Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.PURPOSE To compare two methods of surgical augmentation (prism adaptation and the augmented surgery formula) in the management of acquired comitant esotropia. METHODS Forty patients were included in this prospective study and assigned to either the prism adaptation (20 patients) or augmented surgery (20 patients) group. After preoperative prism adaptation, patients in the prism adaptation group were classified as prism adaptation responders (fusers) or non-responders (non-fusers). All patients in the prism adaptation group underwent surgery for the prism-adapted angle. Patients in the augmented surgery group underwent surgery based on the augmented surgery formula, defined as the average of the near deviation without correction and the distance deviation with correction. RESULTS In the prism adaptation group, 6 patients (30%) were prism responders, whereas 14 (70%) were non-responders. The 3-month motor success rate was significantly higher in the prism adaptation group (90%) than the augmented surgery group (55%) (P = .013). The 6-month motor success rate was not significantly higher in the prism adaptation group (95%) than the augmented surgery group (80%) (P = .151). The improvement in the 6-month outcome was mainly attributed to hyperopic spectacle power reduction after 3-month postoperative evaluation to correct consecutive exotropia. CONCLUSIONS Although prism adaptation is superior in precisely determining the surgical target angle, the success rates were comparable between the two groups after hyperopic spectacle power reduction. This obviates the need for prism adaptation, except in cases of non-accommodative esotropia. To maximize the benefit of prism adaptation, it is recommended that all patients with prism adaptation (responders and non-responders) undergo surgery for the prism-adapted angle. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020;57(2)108-119.]. Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.PURPOSE To investigate corneal biomechanical properties in patients with childhood obesity. METHODS The study included 47 patients with childhood obesity (study group) and 39 healthy patients (control group). Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) were measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert, Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, NY) in each eye. Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber angle (ACA), anterior chamber volume (ACV), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurements were obtained by the Pentacam rotating Scheimpflug camera (Oculus Optikgeräte GmBh, Wetzlar, Germany). RESULTS The mean corneal hysteresis was 10.56 ± 1.52 mm Hg in the study group and 11.16 ± 1.92 mm Hg in the control group (P = .022). The mean IOP was 14.9 ± 2.0 mm Hg in the study group and 14.1 ± 1.3 mm Hg in the control group (P = .003). Corneal hysteresis showed a significant, positive correlation with corneal resistance factor (P less then .