Braunbonde2310

Little is known of the cognitive functions, employment, and social status in adult survivors of childhood brain tumor (BT). We aimed to determine the long-term neurocognitive profile of radiotherapy-treated adult survivors of childhood BT and the relationship between cognitive functions and employment and social status.

Neurocognitive profiles of survivors were assessed in a Finnish national cohort of 71 radiotherapy-treated survivors of childhood BT (median follow-up time 21 years [range 5-33 years]) using a cross-sectional design. Neurocognitive outcomes were compared to control (n = 45) and normative values. Tumor- and treatment-related data were collected from the patient files. Information on employment and social status was gathered.

Survivors' (median age 27 years [range 16-43 years]) median verbal and performance intelligence quotient (IQ) was 90 (range 49-121) and 87 (range 43-119), respectively. The cognitive domains with the greatest impairment were executive functions (median

score, -3.5 SD [range -25.0 to 1.3 SD]), and processing speed and attention (median

score, -2.5 SD [range -24.9 to 0.5 SD]). Executive functions were associated with employment, educational level, living independently, having an intimate relationship, and having a driving license. Processing speed and attention were related to educational level, living independently, having an intimate relationship, and having a driving license. Performance IQ was associated with educational level and employment status. Working memory was associated with educational level and living independently.

Radiotherapy-treated adult survivors of childhood BT experience significant neurocognitive impairment, which is associated with difficulties related to employment and social status.

Radiotherapy-treated adult survivors of childhood BT experience significant neurocognitive impairment, which is associated with difficulties related to employment and social status.Adoptive cell therapies are a group of cancer immunotherapies that involve the infusion of engineered immune cells targeting specific tumor antigens, with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells at the vanguard of this revolution in cancer therapy. Several CAR T-cell products have been approved for the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma and many more are currently undergoing evaluation in clinical trials for the treatment of other liquid and solid malignancies. Despite their remarkable effectiveness, as with other immunotherapies, CAR T cells are frequently associated with systemic and neurologic toxicity. There has been a major effort by many institutions to develop specific protocols to guide the management of treatment-associated toxicities (eg, cytokine release syndrome [CRS]). However, neurotoxic effects of CAR T-cell therapies are more difficult to evaluate and treat, not easily lending themselves to an algorithmic approach to diagnosis and management. Given the steadily expanding use of CAR T-cell therapies for various malignancies, it is of critical importance for neuro-oncologists to be familiar with the clinical presentation and management principles of CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity. Here, we present key principles for the evaluation and management of patients affected by CAR T-cell-associated neurotoxicity based on the most recent evidence.While immuno-oncotherapy (IO) has significantly improved outcomes in the treatment of systemic cancers, various neurological complications have accompanied these therapies. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) risks multi-organ autoimmune inflammatory responses with gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and endocrine complications being the most common types of complications. Despite some evidence that these therapies are effective to treat central nervous system (CNS) tumors, there are a significant range of related neurological side effects due to ICIs. Neuroradiologic changes associated with ICIs are commonly misdiagnosed as progression and might limit treatment or otherwise impact patient care. Here, we provide a radiologic case series review restricted to neurological complications attributed to ICIs, anti-CTLA-4, and PD-L-1/PD-1 inhibitors. We report the first case series dedicated to the review of CNS/PNS radiologic changes secondary to ICI therapy in cancer patients. We provide a brief case synopsis with neuroimaging followed by an annotated review of the literature relevant to each case. We present a series of neuroradiological findings including nonspecific parenchymal and encephalitic, hypophyseal, neural (cranial and peripheral), meningeal, cavity-associated, and cranial osseous changes seen in association with the use of ICIs. Misdiagnosis of radiologic abnormalities secondary to neurological immune-related adverse events can impact patient treatment regimens and clinical outcomes. Rapid recognition of various neuroradiologic changes associated with ICI therapy can improve patient tolerance and adherence to cancer therapies.Adolescent and young adult (AYA; ages 15-39) patients represent a population that experiences significant challenges in cancer care and research, exemplified by poorer clinical outcomes as well as unmet psychosocial and reproductive health needs. H-Cys(Trt)-OH Despite central nervous system (CNS) tumors being one of the most common malignancies diagnosed in the age group, there is a clear paucity of AYA CNS tumor-specific publications, especially those related to the unique psychosocial and reproductive health needs of this population of patients. In this review, we examine various aspects of AYA oncological care including tumor biology, clinical outcome, clinical trials enrollment rate, site of care, unique psychosocial needs, and oncofertility. We assess the current state of these issues, highlight areas of deficiencies, and outline the steps needed to address these concerns. We emphasize the importance of comprehensive molecular testing as part of the diagnostic work-up, expansion of clinical trial availability, access to psychosocial care and oncofertility expertise, and the development of AYA-specific clinical research to define best practices and advancing care for this population.