Bojsenthisted6142

In those cases where preserving physeal function is not possible, the orthopaedic surgeon must deal with the sequelae of limb-length discrepancies and/or bone deformities.Lower limb deformities have a wide range of presentations and require significant preparation and planning from the surgeon to correct. It is important to provide a clear and systematic approach to preoperative planning for these cases and to detail three well-established correction techniques external fixation, plate fixation, and intramedullary nail fixation. In using a simple mnemonic that lays out the systematic analysis of various axis lines and joint angles from proximal to distal in the lower extremity, deformities can be readily identified, and correction strategies can be effectively used to produce a successful deformity correction that restores colinear alignment to the lower limb. Additional pearls and pitfalls for these techniques are also provided to assist with some of the nuances that exist in the field.All orthopaedic surgeons during the course of their career will likely encounter both benign and malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms. Given the rarity of these entities and the stress conferred by diagnosing a tumor or tumorlike condition, many orthopaedic surgeons may benefit from a review of the contemporary treatment of such patients. Whether in the outpatient clinic or following a high-energy trauma, special attention should be given to concerning signs and symptoms that will aid in the workup of children and adults with a possible tumor. A thorough and logical workup in this manner will often lead to a definitive diagnosis such as metastatic bone disease or perhaps a benign lesion. Wnt assay In these instances, the informed general orthopaedic surgeon or subspecialist may choose to treat the patient independently. However, if the workup is inconclusive or if the diagnosis is even questionably malignant, referral to an orthopaedic oncologist should be sought as to avoid pitfalls in diagnosis and treatment.There are an increasing number of patients who present with metastatic bone disease as the survival of patients with cancer improves in recent decades. The pelvis is the second most common site for skeletal metastases. Metastatic lesions in the pelvis can be largely divided into periacetabular lesions (Enneking zone II) and non-periacetabular lesions (zones I, III, and IV). Traditionally, patients with a symptomatic zone II lesion are treated with a cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) using variations on the traditional Harrington method. These open surgeries are accompanied by many inherent risks. Both a prolonged recovery and wide range of potential complications may delay or interrupt the adjuvant radiation and systemic therapy. It was observed that the articular surface of the hip joint was often intact and that the femoral side was frequently not involved in these patients. A novel minimally invasive technique for hip joint preservation has recently been developed. Three large-bore cannulated screws are placed percutaneously under fluoroscopy in a tripod configuration to reinforce the mechanical axis of the acetabulum. Increased stability improves pain control and permits immediate weight bearing. When the disease progresses, this construct can be easily converted to a cemented THA using the tripod screws as rebar to support an acetabular cup, as part of a staged Harrington procedure. This approach is technically demanding. A detailed guide for the tripod technique should encompass indications, preoperative preparation, operating room settings, intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance, modifications, postoperative care, and subsequent conversion to a cemented THA, if needed.Many orthopaedic procedures for osteolytic metastases are performed using surgical techniques and implants that are used in arthroplasties or trauma surgeries. There is a need for development of skeletal metastasis-specific procedures. Massive osteolytic metastases in periacetabular regions are managed with open surgical procedures when radiation and antiresorptive agents fail to prevent development and progression of the lesion. An ideal procedure for osteolytic metastases would decrease cancer burden and stabilize weakened bones for continued ambulatory oncologic care without delay. Therefore, ablation, osteoplasty, reinforcement, and internal fixation (AORIF) is a new alternative percutaneous procedure for osteolytic metastases in pelvis and other periarticular osteolytic metastases. Percutaneously inserted cannulated screws provide a universal portal for catheters for ablation, balloon osteoplasty, and zoledronate-loaded bone cement. AORIF reduces local cancer burden by radiofrequency ablation and improves bone strength immediately with polymethyl methacrylate bone cement for enhanced ambulatory oncologic care. Similar to other reported series of percutaneous reinforcement procedures, AORIF improves ambulatory status for localized bone defects in patients who seek anticancer drug therapies. AORIF does not provide anatomic restoration of established comminuted acetabular fractures or protrusio acetabuli but improves pain and ambulatory status for continued oncologic care. AORIF is a new alternative first-line minimally-invasive procedure for patients with advanced cancers and osteolytic pelvic metastases.Metastatic disease to the bone and soft tissue creates significant morbidity because of pain resulting in decreased functional status. Palliative chemotherapy and radiation therapy were historically the mainstays of pain reduction. Minimally invasive technologies such as image-guided ablation and cementoplasty have become common in interventional radiology. Advances in image guidance and ablation technologies have improved the multidisciplinary approach in the management of bone and soft-tissue disease. The minimally invasive nature of the interventions allows prompt initiation or continuation of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. These safe and efficacious procedures have improved patient quality of life by decreasing pain and improving function.The surgical management of acetabular and pelvic lesions due to metastatic bone disease is complex in nature. These patients are typically in a frail state, having severe pain, limited mobility, and impaired wound healing. This causes a potential for complications, a high concern for the surgeon. Compounding these issues is limited life span for these patients given the advancement of the disease. Considerations for patients undergoing surgical treatment are achievement of significant pain relief and restoration of ambulation, all while having minimal complications during the postoperative period. Management may also include nonsurgical and interventional methods. A multidisciplinary approach is required for the successful treatment of these patients. Although there have been various surgical methods described, there is still no standardized modality that has been noted. These lesions often require complex decision making, imaging, and surgical reconstruction.Distal radius fractures are common. Volar plating is a valuable approach for many fractures. There are also difficult fractures that require careful attention to the exposure and technique for successful volar plating. Classic approaches, such as external fixation with additional percutaneous reduction and pinning or bone graft and fragment-specific fixation, remain valuable especially when volar plating is not applicable. The main objectives are to review the intricacies of volar plating and the use of external fixation with distal radius fractures. This also includes an understanding of the associated injuries that are present with these fractures and the expected outcome of these injuries relative to the distal radius fracture. First, the challenges with volar locked plating as well as many tips and tricks to help with reduction and stabilization of these fractures are reviewed. Second, the benefits and tips and tricks of external fixation are discussed. Finally, the management of common combined injuries with distal radius fractures is reviewed.Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis is commonly encountered and multifactorial in etiology, and its management is based on the radiographic stage and surgeon preference. A variety of management strategies exist including ligament reconstruction, arthroscopic débridement, extension osteotomy, open versus arthroscopic total and partial trapeziectomy with or without interposition and/or suspensionplasty, arthrodesis, and total or hemi implant arthroplasty. A review of the literature shows each of these management strategies to be effective in pain relief, but no one procedure has been shown to be superior despite theoretic benefits to preserving trapezial height. The one common denominator is removal of the arthritic contact between the thumb metacarpal and trapezial surfaces.Glenohumeral arthritis in athletes or young and active individuals constitutes a challenging clinical problem, and multiple factors should be taken into consideration when deciding on nonsurgical or surgical treatment in this patient cohort. Selection of therapy should be based on clinical evidence, but the therapeutic strategy should align with patient expectations. Patient education on the nature and progression of shoulder osteoarthritis may facilitate the decision-making process regarding the selection of treatment. The orthopaedic surgeon should be knowledgeable about the nonarthroplasty options for the management of shoulder osteoarthritis in the aging athlete, with special focus on nonsurgical treatment options and shoulder arthroscopy.Osteoarthritis of the knee affects many Americans. With the aging of the population and increasing comorbidities (eg, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, heart disease), the use of oral or topical NSAIDs is often contraindicated. Injectable treatment options are advantageous because of the ability to decrease or avoid the unwanted systematic adverse effects of NSAIDs. Injectable treatment options for osteoarthritis of the knee go back to the 1950s, beginning with corticosteroids, which remain widely used despite concerns that they may have adverse effects on articular chondrocytes and short duration of efficacy. The recent (FDA approval in 2017) introduction of a sustained-release corticosteroid (triamcinolone acetonide extended-release) offers significantly longer benefit than standard cortisone products and with substantially lower concentration levels of chondrocyte exposure to the steroid. Hyaluronic acid was added to the options for intra-articular injection in osteoarthritis of the knee in the late 1990s and remains widely used despite some controversy over its efficacy. Although guidelines for the use of hyaluronic acid for management of osteoarthritis of the knee have varied widely, careful analysis of the data and patient's perceived efficacy indicate its continued and important role in managing osteoarthritis of the knee. Finally, the past 15 years have seen an explosion in the use of biologics including platelet-rich plasma and pluripotential (often termed stem) cells. The science behind their use and efficacy is evolving and continued study is warranted.