Blackburnbond9784

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility and rate of patients returning to the hospital when a same-day discharge protocol is used for patients undergoing transradial uterine artery embolization (UAE) for symptomatic fibroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 374 patients who underwent transradial UAE with a same-day discharge protocol between April 2013 and June 2019, with documented follow-up, were included in this single-health-system retrospective study. Angiographic images and procedural reports were reviewed for technical success (defined as bilateral embolization). Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient and fibroid characteristics, adverse events, clinical success (defined as documented improvement in symptoms or patient satisfaction), and unplanned clinic visits, emergency department visits, and readmissions within 30 days of UAE. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for unplanned visits. RESULTS. Eight (2.1%) patients required conversion to inpatient stay (mean length of stay, 1.4 days; range, 1-3 days). The median postprocedure observation time was 3.7 hours (range, 1.1-12.5 hours). Technical success was achieved in 94.7% of patients, with 2.4% requiring crossover to the femoral artery for access. Clinical success was achieved in 86.0% of patients, with 6-month reductions in uterus and dominant leiomyoma volume of 30.4% and 42.9%, respectively. Rates of unplanned clinic visits, emergency department visits, and readmissions were 3.2%, 5.1%, and 0.5%, respectively. selleck kinase inhibitor Patients with submucosal fibroids or pain as an indication for UAE were significantly more likely to have unplanned visits. CONCLUSION. Transradial UAE for symptomatic fibroids can be performed using a same-day discharge protocol with low rates of patients returning to the hospital. Submucosal location and pain as an indication for UAE were predictors of early return.OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to prospectively evaluate the technical feasibility of the free-breathing fast T2-weighted MultiVane XD sequence (sequence with non-Cartesian k-space filling using radial rectangular blades) at 3-T MRI for large airway assessment in pediatric patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty consecutive pediatric patients (23 boys and 17 girls; age range, 5-15 years) referred for MRI examination for indications not related to neck, chest, or large airway disorders were enrolled in this prospective research study. All children underwent MRI in three planes using a free-breathing fast T2-weighted MultiVane XD sequence at 3-T MRI. The MR images were assessed by two pediatric radiologists independently for visualization of the large airways at six levels. The quality of the MR images was assessed and graded. Interobserver agreement between two radiologists was assessed using the kappa test, McNemar test, and intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS. High-quality MR images of the large airways were obtained in at least one plane in 38 MRI examinations (95.0%) by reviewer 1 and 37 MRI examinations (92.5%) by reviewer 2. Best-quality MR images with the least artifacts were seen in the sagittal plane followed by the coronal plane and the axial plane. The kappa test of agreement showed almost-perfect agreement between the two radiologists for MR image quality in the sagittal (κ = 1), coronal (κ = 0.96), and axial (κ = 0.81) planes. The McNemar test and intraclass correlation coefficients revealed similar results. CONCLUSION. The free-breathing fast T2-weighted MultiVane XD sequence at 3-T MRI is a technically feasible and promising new MRI technique for evaluating the large airways of pediatric patients in daily clinical practice.OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare radiology trainees' perceptions of the culture regarding speaking up about patient safety and unprofessional behavior in the clinical environment and to assess the likelihood that they will speak up in the presence of a medical hierarchy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study included radiology trainees from nine hospitals who attended a communication workshop. Trainees completed questionnaires assessing their perceptions of the support provided by their clinical environment regarding speaking up about patient safety and unprofessional behavior. We also queried their likelihood of speaking up within a team hierarchy about an error presented in a hypothetical clinical vignette. RESULTS. Of 61 participants, 58 (95%) completed questionnaires. Of these 58 participants, 84% felt encouraged by colleagues to speak up about safety concerns, and 57% felt encouraged to speak up about unprofessional behavior (p less then .001). Moreover, 17% and 34% thought speaking up about safety concerns and unprofessional behavior, respectively, was difficult (p less then .02). Trainees were less likely to agree that speaking up about unprofessional behavior (compared with speaking up about safety concerns) resulted in meaningful change (66% vs 95%; p less then .001). In a vignette describing a sterile technique error, respondents were less likely to speak up to an attending radiologist (48%) versus a nurse, intern, or resident (79%, 84%, and 81%, respectively; p less then .001). Significant predictors of the likelihood of trainees speaking up to an attending radiologist included perceived potential for patient harm as a result of the error (odds ratio [OR], 6.7; p less then .001), perceptions of safety culture in the clinical environment (OR, 5.0; p = .03), and race or ethnicity (OR, 3.1; p = .03). CONCLUSION. Radiology trainees indicate gaps in workplace cultures regarding speaking up, particularly concerning unprofessional behavior and team hierarchy.OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of radiography in diagnosing osteonecrosis of the femoral head with pathologic examination as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Radiography and pathology reports of 253 consecutive femoral head resections were reviewed. A subset of 128 cases in which the diagnosis of osteonecrosis was made or suggested radiographically or pathologically were reviewed to evaluate for factors that might influence correlation. A total of 23 patients in this subset had also undergone MRI, and those reports and images were reviewed. RESULTS. There was 93.9% agreement between radiography and pathologic examination overall (κ = 0.67). When grade 3 osteoarthritis was present, 95.0% agreement was found, but because of the large number of patients with severe osteoarthritis, the kappa value decreased to 0.51. In the subset of cases in which osteonecrosis was diagnosed or suspected, radiologic-pathologic correlation decreased as osteoarthritis grade increased, and the diagnostic uncertainty for both evaluation methods increased.