Bendersmall2650

These shortcomings of legume starches are usually mitigated by annealing, heat-moisture treatment, cross-linking, acid-thinning, oxidation, and acetylation. This review highlighted developments in the isolation, composition, morphology, physicochemical properties, and some aspect of physical and chemical modification of legume starches.The future of food and sustainability of the staple food crops are of utmost importance in the 21st century. Micronutrient deficiency, for example, in iron and zinc, is a common cause of human diseases. Mineral content of the staple food crops has therefore crosscutting importance for food engineering and planetary health. Finger millet, a staple food of agricultural importance worldwide, is rich in iron and zinc, and an ideal model to study the prospects of biofortified foods in times of climate change. We report here a multiomics study of the iron and zinc homeostasis in the finger millet. We identified and characterized 15 candidate genes potentially involved in iron and zinc homeostasis pathways in the finger millet. Structural and functional annotation of the candidate genes revealed a high similarity index with their respective homologs (Oryza sativa, Triticum aestivum, Zea mays, Hordeum vulgare, and Setaria italica). Transcriptome-wide expression analysis showed that genes involved in uptake and translocation of iron and zinc are highly expressed in the GP-1 genotype, while those involved in bioavailability of iron and zinc are expressed more in the GP-45 genotype of the finger millet. In conclusion, finger millet, being a stress-resilient crop, utilizes a combination of strategies in iron and zinc homeostasis pathway, which appear to play an important role in food crop acquisition of iron and zinc, despite environmentally limiting conditions. These data offer molecular insights on iron and zinc accumulation and paves the way for new strategies toward staple food crop with mineral biofortification.

Hip arthroscopy has become the standard for the operative treatment of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. Given the high levels of postoperative pain associated with hip arthroscopy, optimal analgesia is critical to ensure patient comfort and safety after discharge.

Our purpose was to perform a single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the use of pericapsular injection versus lumbar plexus blockade for postoperative pain control after arthroscopic surgery on the hip. We hypothesized that pericapsular injection would provide equivalent pain relief to that of lumbar plexus blockade while minimizing adverse effects and alleviating the dependence on a qualified individual to administer.

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

A total of 64 consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were prospectively assessed over a 6-month period between 2017 and 2018. Patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups 32 patients received a lumbar plexus blockade by a single anesthesioloov ID NCT03244631.

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03244631.Different species of the genus Pouteria have been used in folk medicine for the treatment of inflammation, fever, ulcers, diabetes, and diarrhea. MethyleneBlue We analyzed the phytochemical profile of the hydroethanolic extract from Pouteria ramiflora leaves by electrospray ionization ion trap tandem mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection, and examined whether it alone and in combination with cisplatin interfered with cell proliferation and death processes in HepG2 (human hepatocellular carcinoma) and FGH (human gingival fibroblasts) cells. Five compounds were identified in the extract gallic acid, myricetin-3-O-α-l-arabinopyranoside, quercetin-3-O-β-d-galactopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-α-l-rhamnopyranoside, and myricetin-3-O-β-d-galactopyranoside. The extract was cytotoxic to both cell lines by inducing apoptotic cell death and acted in synergy with cisplatin; such effect was stronger in HepG2 cells than in FGH cells, demonstrating some selectivity to tumor cells. In HepG2 cells, the extract exerted antiproliferative effect mediated by induction of cell cycle arrest at the S and G2/M phases. Association of the extract with cisplatin enhanced the latter's antiproliferative effect, arrested the cell cycle at the S phase by CDK2 modulation, and reduced the number of anti-cyclin D1-stained HepG2 cells. Simultaneous treatment with the extract and cisplatin increased the latter's cytotoxicity, apoptotic cell death, and BAX expression in HepG2 cells. Altogether, the results reported herein indicate that P. ramiflora extract is a possible adjuvant to cancer therapy, which can circumvent the cisplatin-mediated resistance mechanisms in cancer cells.Background Human papillomavirus (HPV)-DNA testing combined with self-sampling could increase cervical cancer screening effectiveness, utilizing a sensitive screening modality and an easy sampling method with minimal pain or discomfort. Self-sampling acceptability, though, is pivotal. Materials and Methods This study is a nested cross-sectional survey within GRECOSELF, a cross-sectional study on HPV-based screening with self-sampling, aiming at investigating self-sampling acceptability among Greek women residing in rural areas, and the factors affecting it. Women between 25 and 60 years old were recruited by midwives participating in a nationwide midwifery network. Participants, after self-sampling, filled out a questionnaire with three sections, one regarding demographic characteristics, a second with questions pertaining to the participants' cervical cancer screening history, and a third with questions regarding the self-sampling process per se. Results The sample included 13,111 women. Most participants (67.9%), including those screened or not in the past, would prefer self-sampling if assured that the results are not inferior to standard testing. Discomfort or pain during self-sampling was absent or minimal in 97.1% and 96.5% of the cases, respectively, and 74.4% of the women felt adequately confident that they followed the instructions correctly. Women mostly preferred self-sampling at home compared with health care facilities. Pain and discomfort during the procedure, although rare, were significant factors against acceptance. Most of the women reporting a negative impression had a negative experience with conventional sampling in the past. Conclusion Self-sampling is highly acceptable. Acceptance can be further improved with proper communication of the process and its noninferiority compared with conventional screening.