Beachburnette9941

Background The coronavirus pandemic is one of the most disastrous calamities of modern times. The outpatient departments of health centers have an important role in the appropriate health education of the patients and their attendants regarding disease prevention and control. Objective The objective of this study was to help the health authorities in devising an effective strategy of educating the vulnerable population at their point of first contact with a health professional. Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from 2 April 2020, to 17 July 2020, in the Punjab province of Pakistan. Data was entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Out of 238, 144 were males and 94 were females and the mean age was 34.53 years. Although television was the most common source of information (51.7%) a significant proportion of the people of Shorkot, i.e., 60.3% relied on word of mouth compared to that of other cities (p less then 0.001). Almost 60% of the participants recognized all the symptoms correctly. The majority agreed that wearing a mask was effective in limiting transmission (96.6%) and about 80% of the participants considered the decision of the nation-wide lockdown to be a correct measure. In Shorkot, 32% of the people were against the decision of lockdown, which was significantly higher as compared to people from other cities (p less then 0.001). Conclusions Our study demonstrated encouraging data regarding awareness of the included population in terms of COVID-19 symptoms and preventive measures.Coronavirus Disease 2019, caused by the virus, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a pandemic first discovered in Wuhan, China which has claimed over 1.7 million lives to date across the globe as of 24 December 2020. As the virus spreads across the world affecting millions of patients, there has been a massive movement to discover readily available and effective treatment options including vaccines. One of the limiting factors in treating the disease is its varied presentation and effect in patients, ranging from asymptomatic patients to those left in intensive care units, intubated and fighting for their lives. There are numerous clinical trials and small-scale studies underway to investigate potential treatment options. However, very few studies and drugs demonstrated efficacy while many more are under investigation, leaving care teams dependent on supportive care coupled with experimental treatment options. In this review, we summarize the various treatment options explored to treat COVID-19, discussing possible the mechanisms of fighting the virus.The use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has increased rapidly in the last decade; becoming the mainstay for both the prophylaxis and the treatment of venous thromboembolism in various situations including non-valvular atrial fibrillation, joint replacement surgeries and acute DVT/PE, etc. In the present times, DOACs are possibly one of the most widely prescribed medications in the developed world. The worldwide epidemic caused by COVID-19 caused significant changes in the practice of medicine worldwide. Patients who developed severe respiratory illness caused by COVID-19 were noted to develop a wide range of complications, including both arterial and venous thromboembolic complications including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, etc. This review is an attempt to identify the role of DOACs in the treatment and prevention of these complications as well as the safety of continuing therapy with DOACs in the patients who were receiving them before contracting the infection.The CDC regularly updates guidance on COVID-19 testing for inpatients and hospital discharges to nursing homes and long-term care facilities. selleck products However, most long-term care facilities require a negative COVID-19 test result before accepting patients discharged from the hospital which directly contravenes the CDC guidelines. Due to delays in COVID-19 testing and obtaining test results, patients end up staying additional 2-3 days in the hospital before they can be discharged to nursing care facilities. Furthermore, hospitals have reported facing resistance from health insurance plans to paying for patients' additional days in the hospital while awaiting COVID-19 test results. Hospitals across the country continue to experience an increase in hospitalizations for COVID-19 infection. Complying with the CDC guidance on testing and disposition of patients may prevent delays in transferring patients to long-term lower acuity level nursing facilities, reduce the length of hospital stay, improve patient flow and ultimately free up hospital beds for incoming COVID-19 patients.Background Standardized letters of recommendation (SLOR) have become common features of the medical school to residency transition. Research has shown many advantages over the narrative letter of recommendation including improved letter-writing efficiency, ease of interpretation, and improved reliability as performance predictors. Currently, at least four specialties require fellowship SLORs. Internal medicine adopted its SLOR in 2017. Previous research showed fellowship program directors' satisfaction with the 2017 guidelines. Little is known about residency program directors' acceptance and adherence to the guidelines. Objectives The study sought to assess the adoption rate of each component, barriers to adoption, time commitment, and alignment with intended goals of the guidelines. Methods Anonymous survey links were posted to an internal medicine discussion forum prior to the guidelines in spring 2017 and twice following the guidelines in fall 2018 and winter 2019. Two-sample tests of proportions were used to compare respondent characteristics with known survey population data. Pre- and post-survey comparisons were assessed for statistical significance with Pearson chi-squared statistic. Results The response rate varied from 30% to 35% for each survey period. Medical knowledge, patient care, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and scholarly activity were reported frequently (>96%) at baseline. Inclusion of residency program characteristics, systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, and skills sought to master increased over the study period. Conclusions The new guidelines improved uniform reporting of all core competency data. Overall, the gains were modest, as many pre-survey respondents reported high rates of including components within the guidelines.