Abdijohansson3568

s an established empirical basis for use, demonstrating a reduction in both postoperative pain and LOS. This novel use of ERAS in a podiatric surgery outpatient population has similar findings but was not sustained in all audit criteria. PEP demonstrated promising reductions in postoperative pain and LOS; however, further implementation replication is needed to confirm this expansion of ERAS and the promising results.

The use of ERAS in orthopedic patients has an established empirical basis for use, demonstrating a reduction in both postoperative pain and LOS. This novel use of ERAS in a podiatric surgery outpatient population has similar findings but was not sustained in all audit criteria. PEP demonstrated promising reductions in postoperative pain and LOS; however, further implementation replication is needed to confirm this expansion of ERAS and the promising results.

In a world of data overload, clinical practice recommendations are needed to help practitioners and patients to take evidence-based decisions. However, in the field of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) recommendations on glycemic goals and treatment choice are controversial in spite of being supported by a common body of evidence. We hypothesize that internal and external validity of this body of evidence might not be as sound as expected. The aim of the current study is to appraise the studies supporting recommendations developed by influential medical societies dealing with glycemic goals and the choice of pharmacological treatment in adults with T2DM.

Clinical practice recommendations and their references were extracted out of eight documents developed by influential scientific societies between 2016 and 2019. Internal and external validity of each study was then appraised with standard tools and in duplicate.

A total of 114 recommendations and their underlying 233 citations were extracted. Out of thesransparently to enable real evidence-based decisions.

Medication errors jeopardize the safety of critically ill patients. Using only one method for the detection of medication errors may not reflect an existing picture of patient safety accurately. Therefore, we designed a clinical pharmacist-led integrated approach to evaluate incidence rate, type, and severity of medication errors and preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) and to assess the impact of the implementation of interventions recommended by the clinical pharmacist.

A prospective study was conducted from November 2017 to January 2019 in the medical ICU. The clinical pharmacist performed a combination of medication error detection methods, which included medication chart review, patient monitoring until discharge/death, and attending medical rounds. Detected medication errors were intervened with prescribers. Based on the prescribers' decision on delivered interventions, patients were divided into two groups A (clinical pharmacist's interventions were implemented), and B (clinical pharmacist's inteventions intercepted the majority of these medication errors. The number of preventable ADEs was significantly fewer in a group of patients who received these interventions. However, medication errors formed chains of errors that adversely affected patients' investigated outcomes in the study group with no implementation of the clinical pharmacist interventions.

To investigate the application of evidence-based knowledge and skills in everyday healthcare practice among healthcare personnel attending a course in evidence-based practice (EBP) at the master's level.

In this cross-sectional study, an evaluation of the use of instrumental, conceptual and persuasive research was performed among students attending a master's course in EBP at Lund University. Seven questions from the validated questionnaire in the Longitudinal Analysis of Nursing Education project were used. The questionnaire was distributed among 21 students at the first lecture in the course (the group before the course). Students who had participated in the course 1 (n = 15) and 2 (n = 13) years earlier received the questionnaire by ordinary mail (the group after the course).

The current study revealed that the majority of the students used research in their daily healthcare practice. However, the extent and type of use varied. There were differences in research use between the 'before' and 'after' groups. MYF-01-37 price More specifically, the students in the group responding after the course were significantly more prone to use research in practice than the students responding before the course (P = 0.01 and 0.04).

An EBP course offered to master's degree students provides enhancement of evidence-based knowledge and skills, and stimulates research use in healthcare practice.

An EBP course offered to master's degree students provides enhancement of evidence-based knowledge and skills, and stimulates research use in healthcare practice.

The objective of this paper is to describe the updated methodological guidance for conducting a JBI scoping review, with a focus on new updates to the approach and development of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (the PRISMA-ScR).

Scoping reviews are an increasingly common approach to informing decision-making and research based on the identification and examination of the literature on a given topic or issue. Scoping reviews draw on evidence from any research methodology and may also include evidence from non-research sources, such as policy. In this manner, scoping reviews provide a comprehensive overview to address broader review questions than traditionally more specific systematic reviews of effectiveness or qualitative evidence. The increasing popularity of scoping reviews has been accompanied by the development of a reporting guideline the PRISMA-ScR. In 2014, the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group developed guidance for scoping rlogy are planned.

Despite evidence from studies on nonpharmacological pain management among newborns, many health professionals still don't apply evidence from scientific knowledge in their clinical practice.

To promote evidence-based practice for nonpharmacological analgesic interventions among newborns in the Maternity Ward of the University Hospital of the University of Sao Paulo, improving pain management and promoting healthy newborn growth and development, and better use of resources.

The current evidence implementation project used the JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice audit and feedback tool. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice framework for promoting evidence-based healthcare involve three phases of activity conducting a baseline audit, implementing strategies to address areas of noncompliance and conducting a follow-up audit to assess the outcomes of the interventions implemented to improve practice. Ten evidence-based criteria on nonpharmacological pain management among newborns were audited, by direct observation of the nursing staff activities involving single skin-breaking procedures in the newborn.