Precedent: Porovnání verzí
Z Iurium Wiki
(Založena nová stránka s textem „ Jeden z důvodů, kdy není nutné následovat precedent: per incuriam, or when a case had been impliedly overruled by a later House of Lords decision, o…“) |
(Žádný rozdíl)
|
Verze z 21. 10. 2017, 12:49
Jeden z důvodů, kdy není nutné následovat precedent:
per incuriam, or when a case had been impliedly overruled by a later House of Lords decision, or where there was a conflict between two Court of Appeal judgments. This means that it will not be bound by decision reached in ignorance of relevant statute law, or relevant and binding prior precedent of the Court of Appeal or the House of Lords, or unless the precedent had been expressly or impliedly overruled by a subsequent House of Lords decision. (Cf. also Duke v. Reliance Systems Ltd. (1988) Q.B. 108, 113). (s. 326, Interpreting Precedents, United Kingdom)
Autoři článku: Gealfow (Mgr. Bc. John A. Gealfow)