Papebentsen0737

However, the average staff is satisfied with the performance appraisal system as regards promotion. Conclusion The majority of the clinical staff have a low level of job satisfaction. A review of the salary structure of health professionals as well as improving the working conditions, tools, and infrastructures in the hospital is needed.Background Birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) reduces delays in obstetric care, improves health-seeking behavior during an obstetric emergency, and improves knowledge on danger signs of pregnancy. Aims To assess the knowledge, perception, and practice of women on BPCR. Subjects and Methods This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Federal Teaching Hospital in Ebonyi state, Nigeria at the postnatal ward from June to December 2016. Women who delivered were recruited consecutively on discharge from the postnatal ward. Their knowledge, perception, and practice of BPCR in the last pregnancy were sought. Information obtained were analyzed using 2008 Epi-info™ software version 3.5.1 (Atlanta Georgia USA). Result A total of 438 of 445 questionnaires were correctly filled and analyzed giving a response rate of 98.4%. Most of the women knew about birth preparedness 384 (87.7%) and complication readiness 348 (79.5%). A significant number of women did not access antenatal care within the first trimester 236 (53.9%), did not know that family planning is important in BPCR 216 (49.3%), and did not identify means of transport in the event of emergency 354 (80.8%). No provision of blood during antenatal care for the blood banking system was a common finding 258 (58.9%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, choosing a health care provider was a common finding among literate mothers (OR = 2.8,95% CI = 1.02,7.72), woman within 25-29 years (OR = 1.09, 95%CI = 1.02,1.16), and multiparas (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.67,0.99). Conclusion There is increased knowledge and awareness of BPCR but the comprehensive components and practices of BPCR are still not optimal in our setting.Objectives This study evaluated the effect of Er, Cr YSGG laser irradiation at different powers on repair bond strength (RBS) between ceramic restoration and composite resin (CR). Materials and Methods Sixty ceramic samples were prepared and thermocycled for 2,500 cycles between 5°C and 55°C. Samples randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) according to the different surface treatment control group (no surface treatment), 9.6% hydrofluoric acid etching, 37% phosphoric acid etching, and irradiations with Er, Cr YSGG lasers (1 to 3W). The Cimara System was applied to all samples surface according to the manufacturer's instructions. CR resin was built-up on each ceramic surface using a tygon tube. The RBS test was performed at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and one sample of each group was also observed under SEM and EDS was used to measure the elemental profiles of each specimen. selleck chemical Data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test. Results The lowest RBS was recorded in Group OF, and the highest RBS was recorded in Group HF, followed by Group 3W. There was no statistical difference between Group Control, 1W and 2W. Furthermore, differences in RBSs between Group 3W and the other groups except Group 2W were significant (P less then 0.05). In EDS analysis, there are evident differences between surface treated samples and controls. Conclusions 3W laser irradiation may be an alternative method to acid etching for enhancing the RBS of CR to ceramic.Objective To evaluate and compare the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of Zirconomer and bulk fill posterior restorative material (Surefil SDR) in nonendodontically and endodontically treated teeth. Materials and Methods The sample consisted of 52 caries-free extracted human premolars which were individually mounted in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ring filled with acrylic resin up to 1.0 mm below the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were then divided into four groups according to the restorative material used as group I Zirconomer + Operative only, Group II Zirconomer + Endodontic treatment, Group III SDR + Operative, and Group IV SDR + Endodontic treatment. Fracture strength was tested using a universal testing machine and was expressed in Newtons. The marginal gap was measured at its maximum using a scanning electron microscope and expressed in micrometers. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used to compare the mean fracture resistance (N) and marginal adaptation (μm) between the four groups. Statistical significance was determined at α = 0.05. Results Group 3 exhibited significantly highest mean fracture resistance than Group 1 (P less then 0.001), Group 2 (P less then 0.001), and Group 4 (P less then 0.001). Group 4 had significantly higher mean fracture resistance than Group 1 (P = 0.008) and Group 2 (P less then 0.001). Group 1 exhibited significantly highest mean marginal gap than Group 3 (P less then 0.001) and Group 4 (P less then 0.001). Group 2 had a significantly higher mean marginal gap than Group 3 (P less then 0.001) and Group 4 (P less then 0.001). Conclusion The fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of Zirconomer are significantly lower than Surefil SDR in both nonendodontically and endodontically treated teeth.Background Dental trauma is a major public oral health problem owing to its high prevalence. The school sports teachers who observe children when they participate in sports have a key role in the prevention and management of traumatic injuries. The present study aims to determine the awareness of sports teachers on the occurrence and prevention of oral-facial trauma in southern Saudi Arabia. Methods The present study was a cross-sectional study design among sports teachers in a southern subpopulation of Saudi Arabia. A draft questionnaire with 11 items was constructed under three domains occurrence pattern, prevention, and management of dental trauma. Results A total of 191 sports teachers from various schools participated in the survey. The majority (88%) of the teachers had encountered orofacial trauma among children during sporting activity in schools. The most common orofacial structure involved in injury was the teeth (33.5%) and lips (25.2%). Only 50.8% of subjects knew stock tray as a type of mouthguard and 27.