Laursenpihl4829

Consistent with hypotheses, gratitude uniquely predicted higher QoL beyond other predictors. In addition, gratitude buffered the effect of objective cognitive performance on QoL as expected, but did not interact with other predictors.

These results suggest the need for further research into gratitude as a potential source of resilience for individuals with MS. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

These results suggest the need for further research into gratitude as a potential source of resilience for individuals with MS. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) is a tool utilized with individuals with brain injury, neurocognitive disorders, and other mixed populations to quantify and characterize apathy in adults. The scale "treats apathy as a psychological dimension defined by simultaneous deficits in the overt behavioral, cognitive, and emotional concomitants of goal-directed behavior." It has three versions self-rated (AES-S), clinician-rated (AES-C), and informant-rated (AES-I). Using factor analysis, Marin and colleagues identified three factors for the scale, including general apathy, disinterest or amotivation, and lack of concern. G140 manufacturer The psychometric properties of the AES have been examined in various clinical cohorts, including individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD), traumatic brain injury (TBI), acquired brain injury, multiple sclerosis, severe mental illness, and cognitively healthy middle-aged cohort who are at risk for AD. The AES is a useful, reliable, and valid instrument to quantify and measure severity of apathy symptoms in adults. It is important to note that the AES-C and AES-S were able to discriminate apathy from depression and anxiety better than the AES-I did. It has been translated into Japanese, Portuguese, German, and Turkish. As a neuropsychiatric symptom, apathy should be measured in examining problems of relevance to psychology, psychiatry, and neurology, which may aid in understanding motivation, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Positive disability identity has been proposed as a protective factor against disability-related stressors. Personal disability identity (PDI) refers to positive self-concept as a person with a disability. The most widely used measure of PDI captures disability affirmation and disability acceptance (Hahn & Belt, 2004). The current study examined the association between PDI (i.e., acceptance and affirmation) and hope (i.e., pathways and agency). Hope is defined as a process of thinking about one's goals, including motivation to pursue goals (agency) and ways to achieve goals (pathways; Snyder et al., 1991).

One hundred eighty-six adults with physical disabilities completed an online cross-sectional questionnaire measuring PDI, hope, personal factors, and impairment-related factors.

Findings from multiple linear regression indicated that agency was predicted by both disability acceptance (

< .001) and disability affirmation (

< .001), after accounting for personal and impairment factors. Prety identity in promoting well-being (e.g., agency and pathways) among adults with physical disabilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Self-regulatory efficacy (SRE) is a psychological resource necessary for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) exercise adoption and maintenance. A 2008 review of self-efficacy for CR exercise identified the need for more high-quality research on SRE. The present review had 4 purposes (a) to review the characteristics of empirical SRE and CR exercise research since 2008; (b) to examine the quality of SRE measurement; (c) to determine whether varying quality of SRE measurement moderated the relationship between SRE, exercise, and CR social cognitions; and (d) to make recommendations for better measurement for future research.

An initial search of 766 possible studies identified 29 for review. These included individuals engaged in or completing CR where SRE for exercise and relevant outcomes was assessed. Meta-analysis examined whether SRE measurement quality was associated with the magnitude of effects observed and to determine potential moderation by quality.

There were 11 unique operationalizations of SRE for exercise. Problematic factors included non-SRE variables assessed as the construct, using global versus specific measures, and lack of a time frame over which SRE applied. Effect size was related to stronger relationships as level of study and measurement quality increased.

Since 2008, an increase in studies examining SRE and CR exercise was observed. To advance SRE and CR exercise research, measurement and research quality improvements are recommended that have implications for future mediation and CR intervention assessment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Since 2008, an increase in studies examining SRE and CR exercise was observed. To advance SRE and CR exercise research, measurement and research quality improvements are recommended that have implications for future mediation and CR intervention assessment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).Objective/Purpose The objective of this article is to provide information about the ways in which the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may affect the ongoing public health issue of violence against people with disabilities and how rehabilitation psychologists and other providers can address these concerns in their practice.

This article reviews the literature on violence against people with disabilities as well as emerging literature on the COVID-19 pandemic and its social and medical consequences.

The COVID-19 pandemic magnifies existing issues and barriers facing people with disabilities who are experiencing interpersonal violence. These issues include reliance on the perpetrator for care and assistance, barriers to reporting abuse and seeking help, fear of retaliation and other negative consequences if abuse is reported, emotional abuse related to disability, and exacerbation of secondary physical and mental health sequalae of abuse.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences enhance the already increased risk for abuse among people with disabilities.