Johansenhamann1751

Visceral vascular injuries are relatively uncommon even in busy urban trauma centers. The inferior vena cava (IVC) is the most frequently injured visceral vein and can be a complex operative challenge. Despite advances in early volume resuscitation, improved transport times, prompt operative intervention, and hemorrhage control, mortality rates have remained largely unchanged. This article conducts an in-depth review of the literature surrounding IVC injuries and a detailed discussion of operative strategies and management as survivability is ultimately dependent on the grade of injury, location, and the presence of hemorrhagic shock.Social media has become a permeating form of communication with billions of daily users. Twitter in particular has become a tool for the surgical community to engage with other providers, as well as patients, through active online discussions, sharing of research, and highlighting opportunities for community outreach. Twitter can help with personal branding, mentorship, and international collaboration on multiple types of academic endeavors. Likewise, institutional and residency programs can harness the power of social media to develop an online presence and aid in resident recruitment.Although conscious aspects of attachment representations can be effectively assessed in middle childhood, the few available self-reports are based on different operationalizations of attachment and do not always show adequate psychometric properties. The current study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Attachment in Middle Childhood Questionnaire (AMCQ). Using three independent samples of Italian children (Mage = 10 years, 52% = girls), in three interrelated studies we (1) selected a pool of items from existing questionnaires, adapted them to the same response format, and subjected them to exploratory factor analysis; (2) performed confirmatory factor analyses on the retained items; and (3) used structural equation modeling to assess the factor structure, external validity, and invariance across gender and age groups. The final 15-item questionnaire comprised two dimensions (anxiety and avoidance) and a supplementary scale (security). Overall, results supported the reliability and validity of the AMCQ for Italian children.

Intermittent doses of mannitol or hypertonic saline are recommended to treat elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). However, it is unclear if one agent is more effective than the other. Previous studies have compared mannitol and hypertonic saline in reduction of ICP, with conflicting results. However, no study thus far has compared 23.4% sodium chloride with mannitol.

The objective of this study was to determine the difference in absolute reduction of ICP 60 minutes after infusion of 23.4% sodium chloride versus mannitol.

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study that included patients at least 16 years old admitted to the trauma/surgical intensive care unit between August 8, 2016, and August 30, 2018, who received either 23.4% sodium chloride 30 mL and/or mannitol 0.5 g/kg and had an ICP monitor or external ventricular drain in place. The primary outcome was absolute reduction in ICP 60 minutes after infusion of hyperosmolar therapy.

In all, 31 patients and 162 doses of hyperosmolar therapy were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary end point of absolute reduction of ICP 60 minutes after infusion of hyperosmolar therapy comparing 23.4% sodium chloride 30 mL with 0.5 g/kg mannitol (

= 0.2929). There was no statistically significant difference found for any secondary end points.

No difference was found for absolute reduction of ICP at 30, 60, and 120 minutes, respectively, after infusion of hyperosmolar agent or time to next elevated ICP. Patient-specific parameters should be used to guide the choice of hyperosmolar agent to be administered.

No difference was found for absolute reduction of ICP at 30, 60, and 120 minutes, respectively, after infusion of hyperosmolar agent or time to next elevated ICP. Patient-specific parameters should be used to guide the choice of hyperosmolar agent to be administered.Background Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women, with younger women being disproportionately affected by traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as dyslipidemia. Despite recommendations for lipid screening in early adulthood and the risks associated with maternal dyslipidemia during pregnancy, many younger women lack access to and utilization of early screening. Accordingly, our objective was to assess the prevalence of and disparities in lipid screening and awareness of high cholesterol as an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factor among pregnant women receiving prenatal care. Methods and Results We invited 234 pregnant women receiving prenatal care at 1 of 3 clinics affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania Health System to complete our survey. A total of 200 pregnant women (86% response rate) completed the survey. Overall, 59% of pregnant women (mean age 32.2 [±5.7] years) self-reported a previous lipid screening and 79% of women were aware of high cholesterol as an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factor. Stratified by racial/ethnic subgroups, non-Hispanic Black women were less likely to report a prior screening (43% versus 67%, P=0.022) and had lower levels of awareness (66% versus 92%, P less then 0.001) compared with non-Hispanic White women. Non-Hispanic Black women were more likely to see an obstetrician/gynecologist for their usual source of non-pregnancy care compared with non-Hispanic White women (18% versus 5%, P=0.043). GSK'963 research buy Those seeing an obstetrician/gynecologist for usual care were less likely to report a prior lipid screening compared with those seeing a primary care physician (29% versus 63%, P=0.007). Conclusions Significant racial/ethnic disparities persist in lipid screening and risk factor awareness among pregnant women. Prenatal care may represent an opportunity to enhance access to and uptake of screening among younger women and reduce variations in accessing preventive care services.