Hartvighatch3225

es, was required. Further studies may benefit from the experiences made in the HIOPP-3 iTBX study.

The main challenge in the HIOPP-3 iTBX study was to form interprofessional teams in each cluster. A stepwise, partly dependent recruitment process in a large group of potential participants presents organizational challenges that should be taken into account while planning the study. In order to reach the calculated sample size in the HIOPP-3 iTBX study, a pragmatic and flexible approach, adapted to local circumstances, was required. Further studies may benefit from the experiences made in the HIOPP-3 iTBX study.

Patient involvement in health research is an integral part of health care in many countries. It promotes the relevance and quality of research and increases the meaningfulness of research results. Meanwhile, the value of patient involvement has also been recognised in Germany. The lack of a common understanding of patient involvement and appropriate methods make implementation difficult. In Germany, patients are still rarely involved in the planning and conduct of health research. Vulnerable patient groups such as the elderly and the very old are considered particularly challenging for researchers in active patient involvement due to their special needs, which is why they are often neglected. Especially nursing home residents suffer from a variety of health impairments which are accompanied by a high number of prescription drugs and adverse events and can therefore make patient involvement more difficult. The present project aims to test the method of patient advisory boards for the involvement of nursing hndividual interviews.

The study will provide a potentially suitable method to involve nursing home residents in the research process. The jointly developed study design will be incorporated into a new project proposal. The results will be used to inform the development of a German handbook on active public and patient involvement.

The study will provide a potentially suitable method to involve nursing home residents in the research process. The jointly developed study design will be incorporated into a new project proposal. The results will be used to inform the development of a German handbook on active public and patient involvement.Advances in physical, technological and biological fields have made radiation oncology a discipline in continual evolution. New current research areas could be implemented in the clinic in the near future. In this review in the form of several interviews, various promising themes for our specialty are described such as the gut microbiota, tumor organoids (or avatar), artificial intelligence, connected therapies, nanotechnologies and plasma laser. The individual prediction of the best therapeutic index combined with the integration of new technologies will ideally allow highly personalized treatment of patients receiving radiation therapy.In 2019, the scientific committee of the French society of radiation oncology (SFRO) created an ethics committee. Its mission is to provide our professional community with food for thought on ethical issues, and to identify its specificities within the radiation oncology departments. For the 2020 annual conference, the commission looked into the evolution of the patient-carer relationship, and more particularly to the strong idea of patient partnership. Indeed, the writing of the White Book of Cancer gave voice to sick people and stressed the need for new devices, such as the Caregiving Time. Patients can no longer be considered as objects of care but as people whose dignity and autonomy must be imperatively respected. The acquisition of knowledge allows a bilateral exchange, prerequisite of a dynamic collaboration. Patients can be partners in their own care, partners in training and research (expert patient), but also partners in health institutions and policies. It is this notion of partnership and involvement of the person in their path of care in radiation oncology that we will analyse here. It will be about defining it, by developing the concept of autonomy, and bringing out its complexity and ambivalence through two examples from our clinical practice the shared decision-making process for patients with localized prostate cancer and the patient's involvement in the success of his radiotherapy.Multimodal imaging has become a standard for planning radiation therapy via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) in many cancers. However, its use is now old, and its impact has not been much discussed in light of technological improvements in imaging and advances in radiotherapy. However, in 20 years, the exclusive functional imaging has been replaced by hybrid imaging (functional and anatomical) with successive improvements (flight time, detector modifications, digitisation, etc.) have enabled us to go from centimetric resolution to the current 3 to 4mm resolution. This article will specifically review PET technology, its latest advances and the potential impact on radiotherapy, particularly head and neck cancers.Continuous improvements have been made in the way to prescribe, record and report dose distributions since the therapeutic use of ionizing radiations. The international commission for radiation units and measurement (ICRU) has provided a common language for physicians and physicists to plan and evaluate their treatments. The PTV concept has been used for more than two decades but is becoming obsolete as the CTV-to-PTV margin creates a static dose cloud that does not properly recapitulate all planning vs. delivery uncertainties. The robust optimization concept has recently emerged to overcome the limitations of the PTV concept. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/mg149.html This concept is integrated in the inverse planning process and minimizes deviations to planned dose distribution through integration of uncertainties in the planning objectives. It appears critical to account for the uncertainties that are specific to protons and should be accounted for to better exploit the clinical potential of proton therapy. It may also improve treatment quality particularly in hypofractionated photon plans of mobile tumors and more widely to photon radiotherapy. However, in contrast to the PTV concept, a posteriori evaluation of plan quality, called robust evaluation, using error-based scenarios is still warranted. Robust optimization metrics are warranted. These metrics are necessary to compare PTV-based photon and robustly optimized proton plans in general and in model-based NTCP approaches. Assessment of computational demand and approximations of robust optimization algorithms along with metrics to evaluate plan quality are needed but a step further to better prescribe radiotherapy may has been achieved.