Egandaugaard6729

We aimed to evaluate the risk of valvular heart disease (VHD) among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

This was a population-based cohort study utilizing the Longitudinal Health Insurance Research Database of the National Health Insurance in Taiwan. Patients with and without coding of newly diagnosed AS from 1999 to 2013 were assigned to the AS and non-AS groups, respectively. Primary outcome was the incidental risk of VHD. Multiple Cox regression was used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio of VHD. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity tests were also conducted.

The AS group included 3780 patients, and 22,680 matched subjects without an AS diagnosis were identified as controls. The AS group had an increased risk of VHD compared with non-AS controls (adjusted hazard ratio 1.63; 95% confidence interval 1.43-1.86;

 < 0.001). Subgroup analysis also revealed an increased risk of individual types of VHD, including aortic, mitral, and tricuspid valve disease. Patients in the AS group had a higher incidence of valve replacement surgery after the onset of VHD.

Patients with AS had a significant risk of VHD compared to non-AS controls in this population-based cohort study. Screening for VHD may be needed in caring patients with AS. We suggest that echocardiography may be performed when patients are diagnosed with AS.

Patients with AS had a significant risk of VHD compared to non-AS controls in this population-based cohort study. Screening for VHD may be needed in caring patients with AS. We suggest that echocardiography may be performed when patients are diagnosed with AS.

To assess the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in Caucasian patients with refractory Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) in clinical practice.

A multicenter study of Caucasian patients with refractory TAK who received TCZ. The outcome variables were remission, glucocorticoid-sparing effect, improvement in imaging techniques, and adverse events. A comparative study between patients who received TCZ as monotherapy (TCZ

) and combined with conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) (TCZ

) was performed.

The study comprised 54 patients (46 women/8 men) with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 42.0 (32.5-50.5) years. TCZ was started after a median (IQR) of 12.0 (3.0-31.5) months since TAK diagnosis. Remission was achieved in 12/54 (22.2%), 19/49 (38.8%), 23/44 (52.3%), and 27/36 (75%) patients at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The prednisone dose was reduced from 30.0 mg/day (12.5-50.0) to 5.0 (0.0-5.6) mg/day at 12 months. An improvement in imaging findings was reported inorigin.[This corrects the article DOI 10.1177/17588359211008399.].

Trastuzumab combined with cisplatin and fluoropyrimidines, either capecitabine or 5-fluorouracile (XP/FP), is the standard first-line treatment for advanced, HER2-positive, gastric cancer patients based on the ToGA trial. Despite the lack of phase III trials, many clinicians administer trastuzumab with alternative regimens. One meta-analysis suggests that substituting cisplatin for oxaliplatin might lead to greater efficacy and less toxicity.

594 patients with HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma were recruited from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry. The objective was to evaluate the external validity of clinical trials with chemotherapy and trastuzumab.

The regimens used in at least 5% of the patients were XP (27%), oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CAPOX) (26%), oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) (14%), FP (14%), triplet with anthracycline/docetaxel (7%), and carboplatin-FU (5%). Median exposure to trastuzumab was longer with FOLFOX (11.4 months, 95% CI, 9.1-21.0)

ToGA regimens (7.5, 6.4-8.5),

er. Our data confirm the comparable outcomes of ToGA regimens and CAPOX-trastuzumab in clinical practice and point toward a possible benefit of FOLFOX-trastuzumab, contingent on the subtypes typically less sensitive to trastuzumab, to be confirmed in clinical trials.Currently, conventional treatments for metastatic RCC (mRCC) include immune-based combination regimens and/or targeted therapies, the latter mainly acting on angiogenesis, a key element of the process of tumor growth and spread. Although these agents proved able to improve patients' outcomes, drug resistance and disease progression are still experienced by a substantial number of VEGFR-TKIs-treated mRCC patients. MAPK inhibitor Following the inhibition of the VEGF/VEGFRs axis, two strategies have emerged either specifically targeting resistance pathways, at the same time continuing to inhibit angiogenesis, or using a completely different approach aimed at re-activating the immune system through the use of inhibitors of specific negative immune checkpoints. These two approaches, practically represented by the use of either cabozantinib or nivolumab, seem to remain a rational therapeutic approach also when first-line immune-based combinations are used. The objective of this study is to design a preferential therapeutic pathwalgorithm that are important for the treatment definition. Cabozantinib and nivolumab are identified as the most reasonable therapeutic options for patients progressing after first-line treatment and are the medication options included in the algorithm for therapy selection.

The result of this paper was the definition of an algorithm intended to suggest a preferential therapeutic pathway considering both the outputs of the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) process and the actual clinical practice and the experience of selected panelists. During the NGT process and the discussion phase, panelists defined the most important parameters to be included in the algorithm that are important for the treatment definition. Cabozantinib and nivolumab are identified as the most reasonable therapeutic options for patients progressing after first-line treatment and are the medication options included in the algorithm for therapy selection.

To assess the efficacy in lowering post-operative urinary retention, urinary tract infection and lower urinary tract symptoms and the incidence of adverse events among 12 interventions and to perform risk-benefit analysis.

Previous randomized controlled trials were identified from

,

and

database up to January 2020. The interventions of interest included early ambulation, fluid adjustment, neuromodulation, acupuncture, cholinergic drugs, benzodiazepine, antispasmodic agents, opioid antagonist agents, alpha-adrenergic antagonists, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and combination of any interventions. The comparators were placebo or standard care or any of these interventions. Network meta-analysis was performed. The probability of being the best intervention was estimated and ranked using rankogram and surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Risk-benefit analysis was done. Incremental risk-benefit ratio (IRBR) was calculated and risk-benefit acceptability curve was constructed.

A total of 45 randomized controlled trials with 5387 patients was included in the study.