Doganhwang7780
On the basis of this data and after evaluation for radiographic erosions, it was found that a longer DMARD naive period predicts higher odds of developing erosive disease. Conclusion Early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and initiation of DMARDs is crucial in increasing quality of life and preventing severe disease with deformities, erosive changes and extra-articular manifestations.Background Variation in the shape of the femur and tibia has been shown to influence hip-kneeankle-axis angle (HKAA) and bears a role in reconstructive surgeries such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, data on the axial alignment of the lower extremity specific to sex largely remains unavailable. Thus, we conducted a study with an aim to measure alignment and calculate differences in both the sexes in Indian population. Materials and methods The following radiological parameters were measured from weight-bearing long leg radiographs of 966 limbs of Indian subjects via a morphometric software (Matlab R2009a) (1) Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKAA), (2) femoral bowing, (3) tibial bowing, (4) condylar plateau angle (CPA). The knees were classified according to the Kellegren and Lawrence grading and the differences between both the sexes were calculated with appropriate statistical tests. Results 56.04% of the subjects were female. An increase in the mean age was observed for both the genders with an increase in the severity of OA. Height did not show any significant association with the alignment of the limb. The mean HKAA observed was - 5.88° ± 0.35° in females and - 4.99° ± 0.41° in males. The overall mean femoral bow and tibial bow was - 1.26° ± 0.24°, - 1.60° ± 0.18° in females and - 1.09 ± 0.28, - 1.47° ± 0.21° in males. The mean condylar plateau angle was higher in females - 2.67 ± 0.34 as compared to males - 2.35° ± 0.39°. A greater lateral bow was seen in males at higher grades of OA for femur and at lower grades of OA for tibia. Conclusion This study provides gender-based differences in the various axial radio-graphic parameters in a long leg radio-graphs in Indian population which might help in a better understanding of the etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis and also help planning and execution of reconstructive surgeries such as TKA.Introduction Monolateral rail fixators are more comfortable to the patients and have a lesser learning curve compared to ring fixators. Guidelines are still lacking for rational use of monolateral fixator for bone transport. This retrospective study aimed to analyze and compare the clinico-radiological outcomes of monolateral fixator in infected non union of tibia based on bone gap quantification. Materials and methods This retrospective study included 35 patients of post traumatic infected osteocutaneous defects of tibia operated from May 2013 to May 2016. Group I having bone gap of 6 cm or less (n = 20) and group II with > 6 cm bone gap (n = 15). The mean age was 29.56 (range 18-62) years in group I and 29.67 (range 20-65) years in group II. The mean bone gap was 4.62 (2-6 cm) in group I and 7.6 cm (6.5-10 cm) in group II (P 6 cm is associated with higher incidence of residual problems and complications.Background Adductor tenotomy is needed for clinically complex hips with soft-tissue contractures. It may be proposed that the patients who need adductor tenotomy during closed reduction would have poorer prognosis than the ones without need for adductor tenotomy. The main purposes were to compare the normalization of acetabular index angle (AI), to determine the incidence of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN), and to predict the need for any secondary surgical intervention between the patients who need adductor tenotomy and those who do not during closed reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Materials and methods The study group consisted of 65 hips treated between 6 and 12 months of age. The mean age at the time of surgery was 8.1 ± 1.4 (6-12) months and the mean follow-up was 4.2 ± 1.5 years. Improvement of AI, rate and severity of AVN, and need for secondary surgery with its predictors were evaluated. Results Adductor tenotomy was performed in 22 hips (Group 1), but not in 43 hips (Group 2). Normalization of the AI was - 14.8° ± 3.5° versus - 14.3° ± 3.2°. The overall incidence of AVN was 18.4%. The rate of secondary surgical intervention was higher in Group 1 (63.1% versus 36.9%) (p = 0.014). Conclusions No significant difference was detected regarding the improvement of AI as well as the incidence of AVN between the groups. The need for adductor tenotomy during closed reduction was one of the main predictors of the possible secondary surgery.Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate standardized hip radiographs, arthographs, demographic characteristics, physical examination findings, and their effects on treatment choices in leg-calve-perthes disease (LCPD). Intraobserver and interobserver realibility between orthopaedic residents, orthopaedic surgeons, and paediatric orthopaedic surgeons were also investigated. Materials and methods 47 LCPD patients were included this cross-sectional study. Six separate presentations including different variabilities (clinical findings, standard radiographs, and arthrographs) were evaluated by three different groups (residents, surgeons, paediatric orthopaedic surgeons) and were sent to the observers every other month by hiding patients' personal information. Seven different treatment modalities were introduced for the best treatment modality. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in these three groups were examined. Percentage aggreement (PA) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) tests were used fadiographs or arthrographs increase treatment compliance in paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, however, cause changes in treatment modalities in residents. As surgical experience increases, more difficult surgeries such as safe dislocation and femoral head/neck reconstruction are preferred.Background Megaprosthetic infections continue to be a leading mode of failure after limb salvage surgery. Though challenging, amputations can be avoided with proper management in majority of the cases. This study aims to describe the spectrum of mega-endoprosthetic infections at our institute and assess the treatment efficacy in these patients. click here Materials and methods All patients treated for endoprosthetic infection at our institute between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed for overall survival of reconstruction method, site and type of megaprosthesis, adjuvant therapy, microbial isolates, surgical and medical management and outcomes. Results Thirty-five patients (22 males 13 females) were analyzed following treatment for endoprosthetic infection. Majority were around the knee joint [most commonly with proximal tibia (n = 14) followed by distal femur (n = 12) megaprosthesis]. Ten patients had undergone primary surgical procedure at our institute, while 25 patients presented with infection after megaprosthesis implantation.