Allredhinrichsen3204

Objective. To determine the prevalence of burnout in first, second, and third professional year (P1, P2, and P3) pharmacy students at a single institution and identify predictors of higher burnout scores. Methods. A 31-question anonymous online survey was developed and administered to a total of 390 P1, P2, and P3 students at the University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy. The survey consisted of a modified version of the 16-question Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) and 14 additional questions related to demographic and co-curricular and extracurricular related questions. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted as appropriate to determine differences among the variables studied and to identify predictive variables of disengagement and emotional exhaustion. Results. Seventy-five percent of invited students participated in the study. Results of the analyses showed that P1 students had significantly lower engagement scores than both P2 and P3 students, and that P2 students were significantly less exhausted than P1 and P3 students. There was a lack of correlation between burnout scores and students' postgraduate goals, curricular involvement, and work responsibilities. Married students reported being significantly less exhausted than unmarried students. Conclusion. This study added to the growing evidence that pharmacy students have relatively high rates of disengagement and emotional exhaustion. Because the variables expected to contribute to burnout were not found to be predictive in this study, further analyses examining the positive and negative predictive factors associated with burnout scores in pharmacy students are needed. Identifying these factors would allow targeted interventions to be made early in the academic careers of students most susceptible to burnout.Objective. To determine factors predictive of student failure or poor performance on advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) at a single pharmacy program. Methods. This retrospective cohort evaluated students entering the Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) program from 2012-2014 at St. Louis College of Pharmacy. Students who received a grade of F for one or more APPEs (failure group) were compared to all other students (non-failure group). A secondary evaluation compared students with a C or F on one or more APPEs (poor performers) to all other students (non-poor performers). Data were collected on didactic and experiential performance, identifiable professionalism issues from introductory pharmacy practice experiences (IPPEs), and academic honor code violations. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine factors associated with APPE failure and poor performance. Results. A total of 669 students were analyzed. Twenty-eight students (4.2%) failed one or more APPEs and 81 stug risk factors prior to APPEs.The annual number of Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) graduates is projected to exceed the number of annual pharmacist job openings over the next 10 years. Pyrotinib Loss of retail sector jobs will be partially offset by projected gains in several other sectors; however, oversupply will persist until the number of graduates is more reflective of job market capacity. Large-scale practice transformation will not happen overnight; consequently, schools and colleges of pharmacy must immediately change their perspective from producing graduates to fill pharmacist roles, to producing graduates who are prepared with expertise and professional skills to excel in many types of well-paying positions. Students need career advice including to convince potential employers how a PharmD education has prepared them with transferable high-level skills that are applicable beyond traditional pharmacist roles. Better communicating the value of pharmacy skills to students and employers may also have a positive impact on admission numbers as prospective applicants become more aware of the breadth of pharmacy career opportunities.Objective. To assess Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students' skills and confidence in using an evidence-based medicine (EBM) approach to answer practice-based, clinical questions. Methods. Pharmacy students' ability to provide evidence-based answers for real-world clinical questions was assessed at two time points in the PharmD curriculum using a standard tool and trained evaluators. Pharmacy students' confidence regarding their EBM skills was self-assessed at four points in the program, with the first survey administered before the EBM sequence and the final survey administered prior to graduation. The survey included five self-assessed skill questions and nine self-confidence questions. Results. Two hundred twenty-four students from two graduating classes were included in the analysis. Over 97% of students received passing scores on their clinical inquiries (mean score=90.4%), confirming their competency in EBM skills. Students' survey responses on all self-assessed skill and confidence questions improved significantly from baseline to graduation. Conclusion. Longitudinal teaching of EBM concepts and opportunities for skills practice developed PharmD students' ability to successfully provide evidence-based answers to authentic clinical questions. This was consistent with students' confidence level and self-assessed skill levels reported on surveys. Future directions include confirming students' use and understanding of EBM concepts after graduation.Objective. To evaluate levels of entrustability and practice readiness in advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) students using a pilot instrument designed to assess their competency in performing the entrustable professional activities (EPAs) expected of new pharmacy graduates. Methods. A pilot instrument was developed directly from EPAs to measure entrustability levels on a scale of one to five. Five APPE preceptors from several different practice areas participated. Fourth-year students used the instrument to self-evaluate their knowledge and skills at the beginning, midpoint, and end of the APPE. The preceptors evaluated students using the same instrument at APPE midpoint and end. The instrument had assigned weights for each EPA and entrustability level for a score of 100 if all items were marked five. If a rating of non-applicable was chosen, score adjustments were made. All students in the graduating class of 2018 were invited to perform a self-evaluation at the end of the fourth (APPE) year using the same instrument that study participants used.