Englandchase2692

The research goal was to describe local health department community health improvement plans and hospital implementation strategies, assessing the extent to which they address the social determinants of health. In 2014, we used a grounded theory approach to conceptualize the extent of social determinant efforts in a purposive sample of improvement plans and implementation strategies (N = 12) taken from the community health assessment database pilot project (N = 502). We developed the Community Health Improvement Matrix (CHIM), categorizing public health activities according to target and prevention levels. In 2016, we surveyed NACCHO's Performance Improvement Workgroup (N = 9) using CHIM categories. In 2017, we tested the interrater reliability of the CHIM through an analysis of stories in 30 states (N = 101). We shared the CHIM in conferences, trainings, and focused conversations. The CHIM provides a framework for local public health partners to work together to address social determinants.

Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been applied to patients with a history of abdominal surgery, we lack data on the surgical outcome of LC in patients with a history of gastrectomy. Here, we assessed the outcomes of LC and investigated predictive factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery in patients with a gastrectomy history.

We retrospectively compared the surgical outcomes of LC between patients with and without a history of gastrectomy. We performed multivariate regressions to identify independent predictive factors for open conversion during an LC.

Among 2235 patients who underwent LCs, 39 (1.7%) had undergone a previous gastrectomy (29 men, 10 women; mean age, 72 y; 34 with distal gastrectomy and 5 with total gastrectomy). The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stays, and conversion rate were significantly worse in patients with, compared with those without the history of gastrectomy. Conversion during an LC in the cases with a history of gastrectomy was significantly correlated with age and the type of gastrectomy.

These results suggested that LC in patients with a history of gastrectomy exhibited worse outcomes in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay, and conversion rate than those without it. Furthermore, it was also implied that age and the type of gastrectomy were significant predictive factors for conversion during an LC in patients with a history of gastrectomy.

These results suggested that LC in patients with a history of gastrectomy exhibited worse outcomes in terms of operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay, and conversion rate than those without it. Furthermore, it was also implied that age and the type of gastrectomy were significant predictive factors for conversion during an LC in patients with a history of gastrectomy.

Megaesophagus secondary to achalasia cardia is conventionally treated with esophagectomy. With the advent of minimal invasive surgery, laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy (LHCM) has been used in the management of megaesophagus. The authors hereby report our long-term results of 19 patients of megaesophagus managed with LHCM.

Prospectively collected data of 19 patients with megaesophagus were reviewed for symptomatic outcome using defined symptom scores and achalasia disease-specific quality of life (A-DsQol) after LHCM with an antireflux procedure. Follow-up was done with clinical visits and telephonic calls.

The mean age of the patients was 39.8 years with 7 female and 12 male individuals. The mean duration of symptoms was 105 months. Dysphagia was the predominant symptom followed by regurgitation and heartburn. A-DsQOL was poor with a mean of 58.6±8.11. Nine patients had extra respiratory symptoms. this website All patients underwent LHCM with an antireflux procedure with no conversion, intraoperative perforation, or mortality. At a median follow-up of 66 months (interquartile range, 24.5 to 80), there was a significant improvement of dysphagia, regurgitation, heartburn, and Eckardt scores from 2.26±1.14, 2.05±0.62, 1.0±0.67, and 7.21±2.22 to 0.21±0.53, 0.15±0.37, 0.42±0.61, and 0.57±2.06, respectively (P<0.001). One patient (5.2%) had a recurrence of dysphagia. Sixty-three percent of patients graded their satisfaction level as fully satisfied and 31% as better. A-DsQOL of life improved significantly (P<0.001) after surgery. The respiratory symptoms improved in all.

LHCM provides durable relief of symptoms in patients with megaesophagus and may be considered as the first-line treatment option in such patients.

LHCM provides durable relief of symptoms in patients with megaesophagus and may be considered as the first-line treatment option in such patients.

Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a promising minimally invasive therapy in the treatment of achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders. A concern surrounding POEM is the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) postoperatively. This study was designed to report outcomes and identify risk factors for the development of postoperative GERD.

Patients who underwent POEM between January 1, 2015 and December 12, 2019 were prospectively followed in an Institutional Review Board approved database. All patients were invited for a full comprehensive workup 6 months post-POEM including symptom scores, pH testing, manometry and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. In a retrospective review of this database, those who developed postoperative GERD were compared with those who did not.

There were 82 patients that met study criteria (median age 59). Indications for POEM include 35 type I achalasia, 16 type II achalasia, 21 type III achalasia and other spastic esophageal motility disorders, and 10 esophag other esophageal motility disorders. Patients who undergo POEM are at risk for developing gastroesophageal reflux disease especially in obese patients.

The efficacy and safety of open distal pancreatectomy (DP), laparoscopic DP, robot-assisted laparoscopic DP, and robotic DP have not been established. The authors aimed to comprehensively compare these 4 surgical methods using a network meta-analysis.

The authors systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies that evaluated at least 2 of the following pancreatectomy techniques robot-assisted DP, laparoscopic DP, open DP, and robotic DP. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was applied to show the probability that each method would be the best for each outcome.

Altogether, 46 trials with 8377 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Robotic DP showed the highest probability of having the least estimated blood loss (SUCRA, 90.9%), the lowest incidences of postoperative pancreatic fistula (SUCRA, 94.5%), clinically related postoperative pancreatic fistula (SUCRA, 94.6%), postoperative bleeding (SUCRA, 75.