Aagesenhurst9666

Results With ART criteria, success rates of ART and composite restoration were found to be 98.7% and 100% at 6 months while at 12 months the success rates were observed to be 98.7% and 95.8%, respectively. The distribution of scores at both the time periods was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.033). Same success rates were observed when the restorations were evaluated using modified-USPHS criteria, with statistical difference at the 6 month post-operative recall (p = 0.001), and non-significant difference at the 12 month recall visit (p = 0.310). Survival rates of ART and composite restoration were observed to be 94.8% and 98.7% with no-significant difference in the survival curves (p = 0.173)Conclusions In class II cavities in permanent molars, ART restorations with high viscosity GIC, done in a school setting exhibited similar success rates as composite restoration done in a clinical setting.Design Randomised clinical trialStudy population The present study evaluated patients of different genders aged between 18-65 years old. The study design and the language of the consent form were approved by the Ethics Committee at Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) (approval code IR.TUMS.REC.1394.1906). The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials.Data Analysis The evaluation was performed using the Heft-Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP VAS) and complemented with the electrical pulp test accuracy to determine the success of anaesthesia Results In this study, the success rate was 93.8% (95% CI 79.19-99.23) for mental/incisive nerve block (MINB), and 81.2% (95% CI 63.56-92.79) for inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). The difference was not significant (p = 0.26). An interesting result was the combination of both techniques was 100% successful in the failed cases (2 in MINB group; 6 in IANB group).Conclusions In conclusion, MINB using 4% Articaine showed a similar success rate as IANB using 4% Articaine in local anaesthesia for mandibular premolars with irreversible pulpitis. The beginning of anaesthesia was faster for MINB, and the injection was painless. The post-injection pain for MINB was higher than for IANB. Both techniques showed similar efficacy.Aim This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of fluoride varnish in preschool children for reducing the incidence of caries into dentine.Data sources Data came from published and grey literature. Databases searched were CDSR, Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, LILACS and BBO. Hand-searching was done of nine dental journals and two medical journals. Backward citation searches were carried out on the reference lists of identified trials and relevant systematic reviews. Trials registers (Current Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, and Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos) were searched for ongoing trials. Grey literature was searched via a number of resources including International Association for Dental Research (2001-2018) and European Organisation for Caries Research (1998-2018) conference abstracts and Open Grey, EThOS, the New York Academy of Medicine (GreyLit Report) and Banco de Teses CAPES.Study sele determined at low risk of bias, with four unclear and 14 at high risk based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Studies were from 13 different countries. Children at baseline were from 0-100% caries free, with a dmft of 0-6.57 and aged 6 months - 5 years. There were no studies reporting hospitalisation due to caries. The combined RR for the outcome of dentine caries for an individual was 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.95) based on 16 studies with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 75.7%). Tooth level results gave a PF of 31.13% (95% CI 21.08, 41.18) and a WMD of -0.30 (95% CI-0.69, 0.09) for fluoride varnish. At surface level the PF was 24.15% (95% CI 12.91-35.38) and WMD of -0.77 (95%CI; -1.23, -0.31).Conclusions The conclusions of the paper were that there is modest and uncertain evidence for fluoride varnish reducing the risk of developing dentine caries in pre-school children.Data sources MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science.Study selection Two reviewers independently selected observational studies which compared caries experience between children with learning disabilities (CLD) and children with no learning disabilities (CNLD). Data extraction and synthesis DMFT/dmft, Care Index (CI) and Restorative Index (RI) data was extracted from each study. Meta analyses were conducted on the overall data and then on the following subgroups Down's syndrome, autism and mixed learning disabilities. An adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess bias. Results Twenty five comparative cross sectional studies from eighteen countries were included in the review. The standardised mean difference in DMFT between CLD and CNLD was 0.43 (95% CI; 0.91 to 0.05 I² >95%) and for dmft was 0.41 (95% CI; 0.14 to 0.96 I² >95%). The only significant difference revealed by sub group analyses of the three main disability groups was lower caries experience in the permanent dentition of children with Down's syndrome (SMD = 0.73; 95% CI; 1.28 to 0.18). There was a larger difference between mean CI and mean RI for CLD than for CNLD, however, the standard deviations were large and no variance data was provided so meta-analyses could not be completed.Conclusions Overall there was no difference in caries experience between CLD and CNLD. However, sub group analysis showed that children with Down's syndrome had lower levels of caries than CNLD but this may be due to the delayed eruption of the permanent teeth commonly seen with Down's syndrome. There was limited data suggesting that caries in permanent teeth was more commonly treated by extraction in CLD than in CNLD, however, this was based on only eight studies.Data sources The Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP).Data extraction and synthesis Data were taken from SHIP1 to SHIP3 over an 11 year period. Mixed-effects linear regression models were constructed between the exposure (manual versus powered toothbrush) and outcome variables (probing depths [PD], clinical attachment loss [CAL], caries status DMFS and DFS, tooth loss) adjusting for potential baseline covariates.Results Power toothbrush usage was found to be significantly associated with reduced mean PD and CAL progression scores, for example after 11 years the entire sample showed MTB users to have 0.41 mm PD mean progression while PTB users had 0.09 mm mean PD progression. This demonstrates PTB users having 0.32 mm less PD progression. learn more Similar trends were shown for CAL mean scores.Conclusions There are benefits of power toothbrush usage and long term protective effects on oral health in terms of reduced probing depths, clinical attachments and number of teeth lost.