Munkholmnicolajsen0315

Z Iurium Wiki

Verze z 22. 11. 2024, 14:11, kterou vytvořil Munkholmnicolajsen0315 (diskuse | příspěvky) (Založena nová stránka s textem „The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the existing research that investigates the lived experience during the peri-diagnostic period…“)
(rozdíl) ← Starší verze | zobrazit aktuální verzi (rozdíl) | Novější verze → (rozdíl)

The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the existing research that investigates the lived experience during the peri-diagnostic period of breast cancer.

Nine databases were searched for relevant literature between January 2007 and April 2019. Data were extracted and categorized using deductive and inductive approaches.

A majority of the 66 studies included used qualitative methods to retrospectively explore the treatment decision making process of female breast cancer patients. Patients experienced uncertainty, emotional distress, and a need for more information from providers and relied on social support and family guidance during this period.

The results of this review show that the burdens experienced during the peri-diagnostic period parallel those in later periods of cancer care. However, these burdens are prompted by different circumstances. More research is needed to explore the lived experience during this period through the use of mixed-methods and by recruiting a diverse sample with regards to role in the breast cancer experience, age, gender, race, and ethnicity.

Interventions positioned at earlier points in the breast cancer experience should provide informational support, which could be delivered through shared decision making models. Additional support could be facilitated by patient navigation programs and health information technology.

Interventions positioned at earlier points in the breast cancer experience should provide informational support, which could be delivered through shared decision making models. Additional support could be facilitated by patient navigation programs and health information technology.

Several factors may influence the validity of self-report. In this study, we aimed to assess the validity of self-reported drug use compared to urine testing among treatment-seeking patients with opioid use disorder (OUD).

This cross-sectional study recruited 293 patients with OUD, referred to the Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS) clinic, from November 2015 to June 2017. The study compared self-reported opioid use in the past 72h with the results of urinalysis, using immunoassay technique. We estimated sensitivity, negative predictive value, percent agreement, positive percent agreement, and Cohen's kappa statistics for those with OUD.

The sensitivity of self-reported opioid use was 85.9%. Percent agreement, positive percent agreement, and Cohen's Kappa statistics between self-reported opioid use and urine testing for morphine in the first month were 88.5%, 78.1%, and 77.0, respectively. Multilevel logistic regression showed that longer treatment duration (OR=1.21, 95%CI 1.07-1.37, p-value=0.002) was significantly associated with the agreement of self-reported opioid use with urine testing.

Self-report can be used as a reliable method for monitoring treatment adherence combined with random urine tests.

Self-report can be used as a reliable method for monitoring treatment adherence combined with random urine tests.

Unhealthy alcohol use (UAU) is a major public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Mozambique is the fourth poorest country in the world where half of the population lives below the poverty line. UAU is frequent among drinkers in Mozambique; however, resources and infrastructure to treat UAU are very limited. This paper examines how task-shifting and a provider-facing mobile health application are being used to improve access to care. In this paper, the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of a provider-facing mobile health application being used under a task-shifting model to identify UAU and provide a four-session brief motivational interviewing intervention are described.

The study used a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design with a QUAL→quan structure. First, 15 psychiatric technicians and primary care providers in Mozambique's Nampula Province participated in semi-structured interviews. These interviews were recorded and transcribed. Then, 45 providers cdels to scale.

Provider-facing technology shows promise in supporting task-shifting models that can expand alcohol intervention services and increase access to care in low- and middle-income countries. selleck chemical Providers without specialized training in behavioral health interventions can provide critical services to patients with UAU and provider-facing mobile health applications may help bring such models to scale.

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of providing medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and individualized telehealth in Kentucky, a state severely impacted simultaneously by the opioid epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic.

The investigation analyzed pre- and post-COVID-19 characteristics in 191 opioid use disorder (OUD) buprenorphine outpatients who completed an 18-question survey in late 2020 related to COVID testing, OUD relapses, obstacles to maintaining abstinence, and treatment resources.

The study revealed no statistically significant changes in drug use before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic despite monthly volume increases. Results further demonstrated statistically significant barriers to treatment, including loss of housing and transportation, food insecurity, and onset of depression. No patients required hospitalization or succumbed to OUD or COVID-19. Potentially effective resource utilization findings included clinic transportation and 24/7 crisis intervention. Respondents rated telehealth as helpful when used in an individualized hybrid model matching patient's need to available resources based on COVID-19 safety guidelines.

This report yields key clinical insights into providing outpatient MOUD care during the COVID-19 pandemic, validating in-person care as both safe and effective. Patients' experiences proved helpful in identifying and quantifying obstacles to abstinence in conjunction with facilitating continued patient access to essential clinical resources. Notably, telehealth can supplement rather than replace in-person treatment.

This report yields key clinical insights into providing outpatient MOUD care during the COVID-19 pandemic, validating in-person care as both safe and effective. Patients' experiences proved helpful in identifying and quantifying obstacles to abstinence in conjunction with facilitating continued patient access to essential clinical resources. Notably, telehealth can supplement rather than replace in-person treatment.

Autoři článku: Munkholmnicolajsen0315 (Gylling Noonan)