Thurstonmackenzie2428

Introduction Restoring complex tooth wear (TW) cases is technically challenging and not well-remunerated under the NHS General Dental Service (GDS) contract. Therefore, numbers of referrals to secondary care are increasing, but these are often rejected as dental hospitals have a high workload. This may make it difficult for patients with TW to access appropriate care unless paying privately, which may be costly for them.Aim The aim of this investigation was to understand how general dental practitioners (GDPs) in Leeds manage complex TW cases.Methods A postal questionnaire was designed and piloted before postal distribution to all GDPs with a Leeds postcode (n = 289). Non-responders were sent reminders to complete the questionnaire. The questionnaire included questions on the place of qualification and experience of the dentists, their management of an example complex TW case and the potential barriers to management of similar cases. The resulting data were statistically tested using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.Results A total of 148 (51%) responded to the questionnaire. selleck inhibitor There was low confidence in restoring complex TW cases with a mean score of 4.65 out of 10 (0 being not confident at all and 10 being very confident). Only 30 respondents (21%) reported that they would treat complex TW cases under the current NHS GDS contract, and 90 (62%) reported that they had experienced difficulty referring these cases to hospital. Kruskal-Wallis testing showed increased confidence in restoring by those with a diploma or MSc (p = 0.004 and p = 0.014 respectively). Mann-Whitney testing showed those undertaking a higher percentage of NHS work were less likely to restore these cases (U = 2,100; p = 0.02).Conclusion These results suggest that Leeds patients with complex TW may have difficulty in accessing appropriate care under the current NHS GDS contract. The results highlight the benefits of postgraduate education on confidence in restoring complex TW cases.Background The aim of this study was to assess the association between levels of physical activity and oral health in adults residing in Spain.Methods Cross-sectional data from the Spanish National Health Survey 2017 were analysed (n = 17,777 adults aged ≥15 years; 52.0% females). The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form was used to measure physical activity. Oral health was self-reported through eight variables. Covariates included were sex, age, marital status, education, obesity, smoking and alcohol consumption.Results Dental caries (19.8% vs 27.8%), dental extraction (72.7% vs 75.4%), gingival bleeding (15.5% vs 19.1%), tooth movement (4.3% vs 5.9%) and missing tooth (57.9% vs 62.5%) were statistically significantly less frequent in the sufficient than insufficient physical activity group, whereas dental filling (74.2% vs 70.9%), dental material (36.6% vs 34.8%) and no missing tooth and no material (28.2% vs 25.1%) were statistically significantly more common. After adjustment, there was a negative relationship between physical activity and dental caries (OR = 0.72; 95%CI = 0.66-0.78), gingival bleeding (OR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.72-0.86), tooth movement (OR = 0.83; 95%CI = 0.71-0.96) and missing tooth (OR = 0.91; 95%CI = 0.85-0.98). In contrast, physical activity was positively associated with dental material (OR = 1.16; 95%CI = 1.07-1.25).Conclusions Participation in physical activity is favourably associated with some but not all self-reported oral health correlates.Introduction This study was designed to investigate the accuracy of clinical information provided by referring general dental practitioners (GDPs) following the introduction of a standardised referral form across Wales (the All Wales Universal Orthodontic Referral Form [AWUORF]) and to see whether the information given could be reliably used to screen the referrals.Aim To evaluate whether priority cases were being readily identified and whether inappropriate referrals could be minimised, thereby potentially reducing waiting lists.Method A service evaluation involving the retrospective study of 200 consecutive referrals to a specialist practice over a three-month period. A descriptive data analysis was undertaken.Results The GDPs had successfully identified the main complaint in 156 (78%) of the referrals. Of the 44 (22%) clinically inaccurate referrals, there was no impact on the patient in terms of referral pathway in 32 (16%) cases, but in the remaining 12 (6%), 5 (2.5%) cases were prioritised unnecessarily and the remaining 7 (3.5%) would have been seen more quickly had the GDP provided the relevant clinical information. The appropriateness of referral in terms of eligibility of the patient to receive NHS-funded orthodontic treatment was high with only 18 (9%) patients failing to meet the criteria.Conclusion The AWUORF successfully guides the GDP to make appropriate referrals and enables accurate triage in the majority of cases.Introduction For many years, the dental profession has collected extracted human teeth for use in education and research. Since the enactment of the Human Tissue Act (HTA) in 2006, we have observed a fall in research outputs from the United Kingdom utilising extracted teeth for research.Aims To determine the working knowledge and understanding of the HTA of dentists in the UK who could potentially collect extracted teeth for use in teaching and research.Design A postal/online questionnaire.Materials and methods A printed questionnaire and pre-paid return envelope, which sought to assess both the knowledge and understanding of the participants concerning the HTA as it applied to the collection of extracted teeth, was mailed out to 500 UK-registered dentists. The potential participants were selected at random from the General Dental Council online registers.Results A total of 254 completed questionnaires were received (response rate = 50.8%). Prior to September 2006, 65.6% of respondents had collected teeth. After this, only 37.8% did so. This was statistically significant (P less then 0.001).Conclusions Confusion surrounded the collection and use of extracted teeth, which hampered dental education and research. To address this, there is a need for clarity on the legal issues.