Rushrodgers3129

5%), ground-level falls (70.1%), femoral fractures (35.0%), and delayed deaths (79.6%) due to posttraumatic complications (57.2%). TD-139 Adults, young olds, olds, and oldest olds differed significantly (p ≤ .005) in relation to the total of analyzed variables, with a special remark on the differences between the age extremes. High frequencies of femoral fractures and delayed deaths due to complications of treatment in low-severity fall victims, especially those older than 70 years, make it necessary to improve fall prevention programs in the older adults and to create a line of care for this population.Airway burns cause delayed collapse of airways due to airway edema. Transferring clinicians are trained to intubate at the first suspicion of airway collapse, which can lead to vague reasons for intubation such as "airway protection." Intubation, however, is not without risks, such as pneumonia and death. The objective of this research review is to compare pre-burn center intubations with those performed at burn centers and compare rates of pneumonia, mortality, and time to extubation. A systematic review of articles from MEDLINE and CINAHL Plus was performed to identify eligible trials and observational studies that compared pre-burn center intubations with those performed at burn centers between the years 2014 and 2018. Four studies met eligibility requirements. There were mixed results on the correlation of pre-burn center intubation with pneumonia and death; however, pre-burn center patients were more likely to have earlier extubation times, which points to potentially unnecessary intubations. Clinicians should be aware of the increased mortality and morbidity associated with intubation. Providers should use objective evidence-based tools such as the ABA (American Burn Association) and Denver criteria to determine the need for intubation to avoid unnecessary intubations and their potential complications.An adult trauma center identified pain management as a potential area for improvement. Pain management is at the height of discussion in medical centers across the United States. The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and System (HCAHPS) scores relating to pain management were consistently low ( less then 5th percentile). This project was designed to use a collaborative and systematic approach to pain management to improve HCAHPS pain management scores. This is an evaluation of a quality improvement project using a before-and-after design with historical control. Using HCAHPS data to evaluate patients' pain management perceptions, an integrative three-pronged approach was developed and implemented (1) development of a trauma nurse leadership program, (2) collaboration with pain management providers, and (3) modifications made to the trauma admission order set. Trauma nurse leaders educated patients and families regarding pain management goals and expectations utilizing a standardized script. HCAHPS survey data obtained before and after the intervention showed a significant improvement in patient satisfaction. HCAHPS scores on the three pain questions prior to intervention in Quarters 2 and 3 (Q2-3) 2017 had a mean of less than the 5th percentile. After intervention, HCAHPS scores on the three pain questions improved to a mean of more than the 60th percentile on Q4 2018. Implementation of a pain management strategy involving a three-pronged approach of a dedicated trauma nurse leadership program, collaboration with a pain management team, and evaluation and modification of a trauma admission order set was associated with an improvement in communication about pain with the trauma patients and HCAHPS pain satisfaction scores.Patients assigned lower-tier trauma activation may be undertriaged. Delayed recognition and intervention may adversely affect outcome. For critically injured intubated patients, research shows that abnormally low end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) values correlate with need for blood transfusion, surgery, and mortality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate EtCO2 monitoring for patients triaged to lower-tier trauma activation. EtCO2 monitoring may aid in the recognition of patients who have greater needs than anticipated. This is a prospective observational study conducted at a Level I trauma center. Potential subjects presenting from the field were identified by lower-tier trauma activation for blunt mechanism. EtCO2 measurements acquired using nasal cannula sidestream technology were prospectively recorded in the trauma bay during the initial assessment. The medical record and trauma registry were queried for demographics, injury data, mortality, and critical resource data defined as intubation, blood transfusion, surgery, intensive care unit admission, and vasoactive medication infusion. EtCO2 data were obtained for 682 subjects during a 10.5-month period. Following exclusions, 262 patients were enrolled for data collection. EtCO2 values less than 30 mmHg were significantly associated with blood transfusion (p = .03) but not with other critical resources or mortality. Although capnography had limited utility for patients triaged to lower-tier trauma activation, EtCO2 values less than 30 mmHg correlated with blood transfusion, consistent with previous studies of critically injured intubated patients. EtCO2 monitoring is noninvasive and may serve as a simple prompt for earlier initiation of blood transfusion, a resource-intensive intervention.A quality improvement project was undertaken. The objectives of this study were to describe an original case evaluation tool, discuss barriers encountered, present a standardized simulation course, and evaluate the efficacy of this course. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging adjunct in the trauma bay for patients with noncompressible subdiaphragmatic hemorrhage. Compared with the alternative (emergency department thoracotomy), it is less invasive and allows for continuation of chest compressions, and early studies suggest a positive effect on mortality. Infrequent utilization of REBOA limits provider and support staff exposure to its indications and technical skills required to deploy the device. Furthermore, there is no standardized evaluation tool for collecting and reporting REBOA-related data. The REBOA Review Tool was designed to easily evaluate all the steps involved in deploying the REBOA tool and was implemented at our institution without difficulty. This tool provided meaningful feedback for areas that required improvement including ease of information retrieval and documentation of sheath removal.